(21-06-2011 23:34 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]absolutely spot on snookered 147 and is what ive been saying for ages and some people here dont get that as far as theyre concerened its nakedness or its a poor snight.
Good to see then Rammy that so many people can be satisfied, fuck me I never knew what a turn on topless women could be, obviously I was wrong
I'd better stay well clear of the topless sunbathers next time I'm on holiday then or else I might just shoot my load.
Thanks Rammy. I think there can be quality from all types of stint as I said before. I do, however understand the frustration of Scottishbloke regarding the shows not allowing full explicit nudity as I believe there should be room for this on the regular babe channels without the need for purchase or and encryption. This is not to say that explicit nude shows guarantee great viewing all the time, believe me in nights gone by I have seen some pretty non descript and lifeless explicit nude shows. I merely make the point that there should be room for it and that OFCOM have indeed spoilt things with over zealous regulation.
Yes Snookered that's been my point all along, at the moment I'd even happily settle for an encrypted show but I still want to see the babe channels pro active in taking Ofcom down. A famous saying goes "For evil to prevail is for good men to sit back and do nothing" and this statement could not be any truer in the manner in which the babe channels are being regulated and it angers me to see them unchallenged simply because the owner's of these channels can't be bothered to get up off their lazy arse's and challenge them. I also cannot be bothered in the meantime watching a lot of models going through the motions either and expecting calls. I'm not going to simply get behind the channels when they are doing he haw to improve the situation. At least give us an encrypted show FFS!!!!!!!!!!!!
And let me clarify the whole reason I made the post about how things could improve is that at the moment so much of what I want from the nightshows is just not there. There is a collective responsibility to make the shows better to watch than they are right now. I make no apology for saying that its just what I believe. There are clearly things that can be done to show a bit more creativity and I have attempted to highlight these as best I can.
(22-06-2011 00:29 )Scottishbloke Wrote: [ -> ]Yes Snookered that's been my point all along, at the moment I'd even happily settle for an encrypted show but I still want to see the babe channels pro active in taking Ofcom down. A famous saying goes "For evil to prevail is for good men to sit back and do nothing" and this statement could not be any truer in the manner in which the babe channels are being regulated and it angers me to see them unchallenged simply because the owner's of these channels can't be bothered to get up off their lazy arse's and challenge them. I also cannot be bothered in the meantime watching a lot of models going through the motions either and expecting calls. I'm not going to simply get behind the channels when they are doing he haw to improve the situation. At least give us an encrypted show FFS!!!!!!!!!!!!
I still recall the SexTalk Live shows on 913 with Jada Gold aka Holly Kent, Roxy Rush, Porcha Sims, Crystal Pink, Tanya Tate, Karen Wood and Georgie
How I miss those shows, like I said bring them back and I think at least it would go halfway into improving the situation because when we had those shows along with the legendary Sportxxx encrypted show the lame shows elsewhere didn't seem to bother me half as much as they do now as you don't even have a choice anymore. It's either like it or leave it. SKY could even give you special adult cards for the babe channels so that would mean no danger of anybody accidently stumbling across the Adult Channels.
(21-06-2011 21:08 )Regenerated Wrote: [ -> ]with the right babes and right circumstances (ie babes who are more likely to push the boundries) it can still be a good night's viewing.
Spot on mate - unfortunately it didn't go out until 3.00 am, but those of you who saw the Ani James/Dionne Mendez romp a few nights ago will know it was as good as anything we've seen since the great nights of Zarwood.
Ani has posted that she'd never met Dionne before that night, but the spark and the chemistry was there and had they only had a bath of mud available to wrestle in it could have been a classic!
(22-06-2011 01:40 )mr williams Wrote: [ -> ][snip]... unfortunately it didn't go out until 3.00 am, but those of you who saw the Ani James/Dionne Mendez romp a few nights ago will know it was as good as anything we've seen since the great nights of Zarwood.
I presume this is the show you're referring to:
http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...00&page=12
I didn't see it unfortunatley, so maybe I have no place to comment, but it didn't look particulary explicit from those caps - unless you were refering to the chemistry alone.
Which brings me to the sub-discussion that's currently going on - that of explicitness vs performance. Personally I'm with Scottishbloke on this (not that I'm suggesting we're correct, of course), but I watch these shows to be aroused and it's very difficult to get to that state with the shows how they currently are. When it comes to visual stimulation, I'm now at a stage where I need more than a pair of tits to get off (unless they're flashed blatantly during the middle of the afternoon
) and there's no real reason we shouldn't be getting harder shows. This, I think, is scottishbloke's argument. A babeshow producer (or was it one of the girls) recently stated on this forum that the more explicit a show, the more revenue they make - suggesting that they'd like the chance to make harder shows than they can currently. If that's the case, they should be doing something about challenging Ofcom's illegal practices. Of course, that's easy enough for us to sit back and say, we're not the ones that would have to go through such an upheaval, but if all the likeminded shows rallied together and attacked Ofcom as a group, I'm sure they would beat Ofcom in a court of law.
Yes first of all Stan going by the caps I have to agree with you, they were anything but explicit, the babe channels are just getting worse as the nights go on when people can refer to that as any kind of signature moment, my feelings are these 2 models would probably have put on a full frontal girl on girl show, dildo's included if only ofcom would allow them, however even if the rules were changed tommorow I think a lot of the current models probably wouldn't show all that much more down to their own personal limits so it would take a while clearing out a lot of the deadwood and bringing in the more daring models. On the bonus side of things, thanks to ofcom I'm no longer going into my work shattered, I only bother these days to stay up late and watch these channels if I have the following day off. No point in staying up only for your expectation levels to be disappointed yet again, yes I'm sure the babe channels are all making some kind of profit but if they put on proper shows they would really start to make the money, I would personally phone in on a regular basis if the show's were uncensored, but I'm not willing to waste all that much time or money with this current decline.
I couldnt put it better myself scottishbloke