The UK Babe Channels Forum

Full Version: Rubbish Night Tonight On The Babe Channels
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
(11-08-2016 17:18 )Longtimecaller Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-08-2016 03:18 )Babe-Review-Man Wrote: [ -> ]Having just had a flick through the channels, there is not one that i find appealing at the minute, weather it's girls or outfits etc, strange as i don't think i've ever gone through all the channels and not found one that caught my eye,

And I'm sure that every girl that was on television last night would love to date you absolute studs. You're obviously so enticing that you'd have to turn everyone of them away and go for better looking. This thread is a disgrace, it's not the early 2000's any more, girls don't get their vaginas out on television for free so can you all stop moaning and wishing it was like the 'good old days'. I hope the girls who read this don't get self conscious because of 'men' like yourself.


Well, that's us told! eek

Bounce
i think its a case of horses for courses end of
...and keyboards for longtimewarriors perhaps?
How am I a keyboard warrior when I'm the one sticking up for the girls, you're the ones hiding behind your keyboards slating girls daily.
Looking back over some of the posts (including my own) on this thread I don't see many that are actually critical of the girls. They are mostly about poor or unimaginative scheduling, bad sets, timid producers etc. Of course there are girls who seem to be lazy or even taking the p**s, but that's true of any walk of life and I would have thought criticism would be justified in that case.
I think it's true (for reasons that have been discussed at length on here) that the shows are very much a pale shadow of what they were about 5 years ago, but I don't think that's a reason for saying things are not going to get better and we have to accept poor quality from now on as a result.
On one specific area, I think the perv cams have been a mixed blessing. Some great shows (if you're prepared to pay the cash), but over use (or poor use) of same can equally ruin a caller's pleasure as it can the overall spectacle.
Yes I believe in giving praise where it's due (I don't think we're all always being grumpy on here actually!) but equally don't agree that we can't criticise when we think something's been done badly.
(11-08-2016 17:18 )Longtimecaller Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-08-2016 03:18 )Babe-Review-Man Wrote: [ -> ]Having just had a flick through the channels, there is not one that i find appealing at the minute, weather it's girls or outfits etc, strange as i don't think i've ever gone through all the channels and not found one that caught my eye,

And I'm sure that every girl that was on television last night would love to date you absolute studs. You're obviously so enticing that you'd have to turn everyone of them away and go for better looking.

I don't see how that's relevant. I'm sure most of us are aware what our own 'league' is when it comes to women, but the babeshows are about fantasy.
If you can't be fussy in your fantasies, then when can you.

And I suspect there are very few of us on here who actually trade on our looks to earn a living.

Edit: And, having said that, I just had a look through the last 5 pages, or so, and I don't think I've seen anyone criticise a girls looks. So I don't know wtf you're on about.
^ Precisely.

The thread seems dedicated to criticism of the channels and production.
Dire. Sad
As long as Dannii Harwood is on, it can never be a rubbish night for me...bladewave
(27-08-2016 01:25 )Censorship :-( Wrote: [ -> ]Dire. Sad

wait till you see the line up for tonight ,dont think ill bother at all with probably the tamest line up ive seen !
Reference URL's