yer rite in 1 respect if she doesnt want to get her tits out then yeah. no problem. most here will agree with that.
but if a girl says send me txts and i will then thats a different matter. she has basically told the guys she will do it on condition of txting but later retracted her statement after guys had txted.
there was no issue with her doing her show, the issue was with the sales hype.
feel free to look up sammi's response you will see that she was less than tactful even claimg she did get topless when in reality she had a few slips. then theres the cum stains on the yfronts remarks. sorta rings of 6 of 1 and half dozen of the other...
im a bit confused by the one or two of the early hours, keyboard tapping brown nosers comments on this forum ,but it sounds like jamie must be related to god. is this correct ?
(20-09-2010 09:52 )rover1 Wrote: [ -> ]im a bit confused by the one or two of the early hours, keyboard tapping brown nosers comments on this forum ,but it sounds like jamie must be related to god. is this correct ?
Yes
Keep this to your self, infact he is
not sure if thats a true fact but he does work miracles
i,ll hold you to that HEX!T. i think i like this banal shit, its goood
(20-09-2010 09:27 )HEX!T Wrote: [ -> ]yer rite in 1 respect if she doesnt want to get her tits out then yeah. no problem. most here will agree with that.
but if a girl says send me txts and i will then thats a different matter. she has basically told the guys she will do it on condition of txting but later retracted her statement after guys had txted.
there was no issue with her doing her show, the issue was with the sales hype.
feel free to look up sammi's response you will see that she was less than tactful even claimg she did get topless when in reality she had a few slips. then theres the cum stains on the yfronts remarks. sorta rings of 6 of 1 and half dozen of the other...
Well fair enough if she was saying text in and i'll get em out... but still didn't. I didn't know that's what happened. I thought people were just slagging her off because she didn't get em out on a nightshow.
(20-09-2010 09:52 )rover1 Wrote: [ -> ]im a bit confused by the one or two of the early hours, keyboard tapping brown nosers comments on this forum ,but it sounds like jamie must be related to god. is this correct ?
Is this aimed at me? I ain't brown nosing. I just thought people were slagging her off simply because she didn't get her tits out. I didn't know she was actually saying she would if people texted in... then refused to.
Now that ive been reliably informed by two of the most respected voices on this forum that jamie is indeed descended from the big G, i now know that sammie pennington will very soon return to the fold. i can feel that there's wheeling and dealing going on behind closed doors even as we speak.
Well that was main thrust of the complaints. I think we call this in my trade deception!!! What wound me up in particular was her little prima donna response and Jamie's endorsement of it. But hey ho she gone now so its all history.
when sammie returns it will be the best news ever because it has not been the same with out her
using a football analogy, no one player is bigger than the team and in this case no girl is bigger than the show/channel - if and it is if as I don't know the facts, she has been demanding more money, then fair play to Elite for sticking to their guns, that's the behaviour of a prima donna and someone who expects to get their own way all the time.
regarding all the texts/sales hype, if anyone had seen her twitter/facebook updates, they were always promising the 'naughtiest show ever' or 'the pups will be out' etc. All this saying one thing and then doing another was quite pathetic nevermind misleading and blatant lying!