thought it was a good show, a step in the right direction. certainly kept me entertained
ickle was right i werent suggesting her job was on the line or anything like that , and also i have a folder on my pc with all her topless photos i have been a fan of hers since her first shoot in zoo.
and
shes a lapdancer that surprises me.
i been thinking about this today as hex's post has bugged me for some reason , and the way it is, that i went about rating sammie on her night show, because of the success of other day girls gone to night, dannie, ashley emma, and my beloved georgie to name 3, who all jumped right into it. so basically i was wrong in comparing her to them 3.
i hope your all right and she does end up like say lori or someone who took their time to unveil the goods but ended up being mind bogglingly good.
(my minds still occiuped by the fact shes done lap dancing
)
oh yes the more sammie fans the better
(15-02-2010 17:52 )199lives Wrote: [ -> ] (15-02-2010 15:41 )Hexit Wrote: [ -> ]you do know they have potential earnings from 50 thousand to 120 thousand a year doing this job
is meant as total income for working as model/pornstar etc or just from the babeshows alone? if the later thats a lot more than i would have thought/guessed.
only saw last 10 mins of last nights show but liked the nipple twiddling in the see through top, sammie's gorgeous.
just from the babeshows alone m8, not just on screen but promo work 2, for there company, such as there photo shoots and websites. potential earnings may not be actual earnings though.
(15-02-2010 19:30 )ickle Wrote: [ -> ]I'd say it's very unlikely that Sammie or any girl is being forced to do night time shows against their will. They may have a little pressure exerted on them from time to time to tease a little more, keep people chatting longer etc but I don't imagine any channel would want an unhappy or unwilling face on screen as it simply wouldn't increase profits. It's also true that there are rules to protect people from such pressure and it's perhaps equally true that these rules could be pushed to the limit on the odd occasion but i very much doubt if thats what's happening here. I think, and it's only my opinion, but it's a huge step from tame daytime teasing to full blow night time hardcore chat and it's bound to have some girls looking a little uneasy at times, it doesn't mean she is being pressured, it simply means she is doing her best to make a difficult transition. It's early days, or rather nights, for Sammie yet, she has only done two 9-11pm shows, give her time and support her even if she never shows more than she already has, topless or not she's totally beautiful.
I don't think chrislatimer was actually suggesting Sammie was being frog marched to the studio and forced to perform, it looked to me as though he was simply concerned that Sammie looked ill at ease in this particular slot and raised the issue for discussion and in a free and democratic society you have to support his right to do so. On the other hand you have to give equal credance to those who jump in in defence of the channels and the way the girls are treated. When it comes right down to it i rather suspect that no one is crouched behind the grassy knoll with a loaded gun
It's great that Sammie has stimulated so much debate and discussion though and no doubt when the gunsmoke clears we can all agree that first and foremost we are all ardent Sammie Pennington fans
i agree with this but, that wasnt really what i was getting at. i see the word "forced" when theres no evidence to the fact. posters not choosing the correct words can imply sumthing more sinister is going on, when infact theres not and it could be looked on as liable.
saying forced means she has no say, and as you say she may have been encouraged, theres a world of difference.
as for defending the channels? lol have you read many of my posts.
so is sammie definitely doing the 9-11 shift tonight ? or have plans changed once again ?
