Think Sammie did pretty well.
We didn't expect nudity so we weren't let down.
Sammie showed more than she has up to now so I'm well pleased with her.
She's the tops for me anyway.
(14-02-2010 23:01 )chrislatimer Wrote: [ -> ]if its sergerant sophia then would be quite fun, what i meant though chillmaster is that she out of any girl i have ever seen do a nightshow, /(including april summers) doesnt enjoy it and doesnt have the enthuishaim.
I do think Chrislatimer has stumbled on the answer here.
Mock up prison cell set, Sammie in tiny white smalls, visited by Sergeant Sophia with her 'bag of tricks'.
Certainly wouldn't need to apply for Legal Aid with the amount of call money that would come in..
i thought sammie had a good night show tonight. very nice outfit especially the top which was very see through and you could see sammie's nips. she was talking filthy on the phones and moved around very nicely. also liked that her wonderful boobs were being jiggled and her nips being tweeked till they were very erect.
as for sammie being forced into it and being explotied i dont think so. sammie has been in the glamour scene a little while now and will know if she is being exploited.
sammie will go fully topless when she wants too and might not be allowed to because of other contracts she has
well done sammie
why all this speculation of girls being forced to do things they don't wanna?.
you do know this is 2010 and there is laws against such things and have management that have a vested interest in the girls welfare. there is no way a girl could be forced into doing something she didn't want to on 1 of these shows,.
you do know they have potential earnings from 50 thousand to 120 thousand a year doing this job so are quite capable of hiring a decent lawyer if they needed 1.
so please quit it with this bullshit stirring. there big girls making lots of money off there looks, they know there value and get payed accordingly and they shure as shit not doing anything they dont want to do.
they may try nights and find out its not for them but it doesnt mean there being forced into it. get a fucking grip...
eloquently and WELL said Mr. Hexit. it really is as simple as saying no. there have been numerous examples down the years of girls refusing to do nights- emma ashley springs instantly to mind; and amber over on BS- she's bullshitted for ages that she MIGHT do nights (BS Xtra doesn't count obviously) yet we've all come to realise she never will. all they have to do is say no ta. sammie will inevitably go topless at some stage this year- it's all about the anticipation. annoying but smart business sense
D'oh! And here was me thinking that Jamie held a gun to the girls head in order to get them to do the night show.
actually that is true. in fact the only reason danica is back on nights is because jamie holds a knife to her dogs throat throughout her 9-11/12 stint
(15-02-2010 15:41 )Hexit Wrote: [ -> ]why all this speculation of girls being forced to do things they don't wanna?.
you do know this is 2010 and there is laws against such things and have management that have a vested interest in the girls welfare. there is no way a girl could be forced into doing something she didn't want to on 1 of these shows,.
you do know they have potential earnings from 50 thousand to 120 thousand a year doing this job so are quite capable of hiring a decent lawyer if they needed 1.
so please quit it with this bullshit stirring. there big girls making lots of money off there looks, they know there value and get payed accordingly and they shure as shit not doing anything they dont want to do.
they may try nights and find out its not for them but it doesnt mean there being forced into it. get a fucking grip...
wow we have a attitude dont we hex, all i meant was that i dont think she was enjoying herself for the first 75 percent of the time she was on last night. maybe forced is the wrong way but i still get the impression that she was " encouraged" to do nights
shes mega gorgeous and 3 months down the line ill probably be proven wrong and she will turn completley, time will see
(15-02-2010 15:41 )Hexit Wrote: [ -> ]you do know they have potential earnings from 50 thousand to 120 thousand a year doing this job
is meant as total income for working as model/pornstar etc or just from the babeshows alone? if the later thats a lot more than i would have thought/guessed.
only saw last 10 mins of last nights show but liked the nipple twiddling in the see through top, sammie's gorgeous.
I'd say it's very unlikely that Sammie or any girl is being forced to do night time shows against their will. They may have a little pressure exerted on them from time to time to tease a little more, keep people chatting longer etc but I don't imagine any channel would want an unhappy or unwilling face on screen as it simply wouldn't increase profits. It's also true that there are rules to protect people from such pressure and it's perhaps equally true that these rules could be pushed to the limit on the odd occasion but i very much doubt if thats what's happening here. I think, and it's only my opinion, but it's a huge step from tame daytime teasing to full blow night time hardcore chat and it's bound to have some girls looking a little uneasy at times, it doesn't mean she is being pressured, it simply means she is doing her best to make a difficult transition. It's early days, or rather nights, for Sammie yet, she has only done two 9-11pm shows, give her time and support her even if she never shows more than she already has, topless or not she's totally beautiful.
I don't think chrislatimer was actually suggesting Sammie was being frog marched to the studio and forced to perform, it looked to me as though he was simply concerned that Sammie looked ill at ease in this particular slot and raised the issue for discussion and in a free and democratic society you have to support his right to do so. On the other hand you have to give equal credance to those who jump in in defence of the channels and the way the girls are treated. When it comes right down to it i rather suspect that no one is crouched behind the grassy knoll with a loaded gun
It's great that Sammie has stimulated so much debate and discussion though and no doubt when the gunsmoke clears we can all agree that first and foremost we are all ardent Sammie Pennington fans