agree so what if sammie didnt go fully topless. she was all but topless for the final half hour when she removed the black bra. really liked her outfit. also sammie spanked her bum. moved around a lot. she also sucked fingers very suggestively and tit wanked a phone.
i think that the reason why some people are unhappy with sammie is that the other elite day babes who have done night all go topless and so far sammie hasnt. sammie will have to go fully topless otherwise shell start losing callers
(20-03-2010 14:52 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]sammie will have to go fully topless otherwise shell start losing callers
Absolutely disagree. Sammie does not
HAVE to do anything Danica didn't go fully topless, & didnt lose callers, other girls have done
full night shows without losing callers. (On another channel) All they got was a load of grief on here for not going topless, Viewer expectation being what it is.
IMO the difference between what danica did and what sammie is doing now is that danica mastered the art of teasing whereas sammie has little concept of that notion. danica always implied that something was about to come out, be it a breast or even the holiest of hollies. sammy never teases, never pulls at her underwear straps, never pulls a bra strap off the shoulder etc...that is to me what made danica sooo popular. i agree with rammy, the only thing that sammie can do realistically now is go topless; why she doesn't now puzzles me big time ! she is a glamour model is she not ? she's been doing it for a few years now, and she has gone topless on tv sevearl times (nuts tv, television x promos?), so what's stopping her ?
Still good to hear her talk filth though.
However, her nighttime performances are sooooo predictable.
I enjoyed Sammie's nightshow last night, i felt we would 'see' more this time, but her general peformance on the beds was great - overall a great show.
To start, first i'll say the obvious - it's great to have more daygirls doing nights, great way to let them experience the nightshows and see if there 'into' it, it also mixes things up a bit - fresh faces on the nightshows are more than welcome, we don't want the lineups to go stale now do we?
Also i liked how she appeared (well to me anyway) very into it, she looked to be enjoying herself, which was great to see.
I loved her movement in her performances, plently of ass shots and open leg shots, and she was never a tad reluctant she seemed along with things very nicely, that's a great sign! I thought the camera work aswell was pretty decent last night (makes a change) it was nice to see proper shots and zooms, and no dodgy one had wonder work, lol!
It was just a shame that the time was very limited.. i think 2 hours of Sammie was too little - especially considering she rarely ever does the nightshows, Would of been great if she did a 9-12 shift like Michelle thorne for example. It was great while it lasted but i felt it was to short lived.
The only bit of reluctantly that she showed was on getting 'them out' but i didn't expect her to, we all would of liked her to, but i didn't think it would happen this early. She hasn't done many of these Nightshows and she hasn't got much experience in them yet, but with every nightshow she will learn and adapt to things easier - and eventually she will be comfortable with getting them out. That's why i think she should do more nightshows, so she can get a better feel for things and who knows she might take to nightshows as well as Ashley Emma did, but who knows? We will never know unless she does more nights, and yes this a plea to Elite to listen and give Sammie more nights.
(20-03-2010 16:47 )Freebird Wrote: [ -> ]...why she doesn't now puzzles me big time ! she is a glamour model is she not ? she's been doing it for a few years now, and she has gone topless on tv sevearl times (nuts tv, television x promos?), so what's stopping her ?
Now this is just a guess, but as you said, she clearly has no problem going topless having done many topless photoshoots, but i know Emma Spellar from The Pad cant do night shows due to modelling obligations outside the babechannels not allowing her to, so perhaps Sammie has something similar. Hence the use of see-through tops, as it could be some form 'loop-hole' as she's not technically topless
Im probably chatting rubbish but its just a theory
but surely if she was under some sort of contract with a magazine or something she wouldn't have been able to pose topless for as many different mags as she has ? the only other contract situation could be that she is signed up to a particular agency which decides if she poses 'guns out' or not. either way it's still bloody stupid
(20-03-2010 21:07 )Freebird Wrote: [ -> ]but surely if she was under some sort of contract with a magazine or something she wouldn't have been able to pose topless for as many different mags as she has ? the only other contract situation could be that she is signed up to a particular agency which decides if she poses 'guns out' or not. either way it's still bloody stupid
Plently of daytime girls have done topless and even nude modelling. Im sure Sammie has no problem with getting them out, it's just when 'it' happens because it will happen. The companys use the sweet, innocent image of the daygirl to their advantage, they know we all want to see them get their tits out, but they keep up the tease and make us wait because they know it will attract much more interest - and more interest and attention will equal more money for them. With that being said however the whole gimmick can only go so far, eventually people get tired and bored of the whole not showing the assets thing...
