(11-05-2011 12:59 )shankey! Wrote: [ -> ] (11-05-2011 12:43 )winsaw Wrote: [ -> ]i don't think sport has toned it down again, 2 nights ago we had Sammie and Tia not the most lively girls on the babe shows,
last night Sophie gave a good show ok she did not get naked but she was very watchable, getting into positions that she could not 3 weeks ago when sport were self censoring
sammi is a top notch girl but hasnt been allowed the freedom of expressing herself like she did on her previous employers yet ,i refer to a couple of her outings prior to joining the sport where she absoluteley sizzled ,things can only get better i suppose!
i never rated her that much on TVX, but i agree lets give her time to see if she gets better
Rammy your relentless if you want to see naked women go watch porn is getting just a bit old and tired now, like I said tell that to Johnny Fucking Foreigner and he'll refute your opinions. Back in 2009 Eurotic TV went through a period of self censorship and their was public uproar amongst the punters who watch the show, pre recorded porn is all fine and well but it lacks the magic that a live show brings, hence the reason why people still watch the babe channels. So get off that high horse that you sit so high and change your record for once, if a model doesn't get their kit off on a so called live erotic show then it fails to do exactly what it says on the tin. If I want to see only topless women I can see them on page 3 in the Sun at any time of the day, I rest my point.
(11-05-2011 15:26 )Scottishbloke Wrote: [ -> ]getting just a bit old and tired now *snip* change your record for once
Oh, sweet irony!
(11-05-2011 15:26 )Scottishbloke Wrote: [ -> ]Back in 2009 Eurotic TV went through a period of self censorship and their was public uproar amongst the punters who watch the show
I'm not familiar with Eurotic TV, what happened in 2009? What was the "public uproar"?
(11-05-2011 15:26 )Scottishbloke Wrote: [ -> ]if a model doesn't get their kit off on a so called live erotic show then it fails to do exactly what it says on the tin
No, it doesn't. There are many different kinds of erotica, some (in fact most) of which involve the girl keeping her clothes on. Naked shows don't really do a whole lot for me, as has been said it restricts the girl's movement as they have to be extra careful not to slip. Most will either lie front down and static (see Ashley Emma) or keep their hand clamped over their pussy (see Lucy Summers). I'd rather see a girl in a thong moving freely without having to worry about it.
You change your f*****g record as well as your constant going on about babes not going naked is getting really f*****g annoying!!!!!!!. You clearly don't get the point of the babechannels. They are about PHONE SEX!!!!! with a bit of visual stimulation.
There is more to an erotic show than just going naked ASAP. It's also boring if a babe goes naked straight away. I like the babe to start off in sexy lingerie and gradually remove it until she's naked. Also a babe in just a tiny thong can put on a better show than a naked babe as she can get into more positions without getting in trouble.
(11-05-2011 15:53 )iloveMegan Wrote: [ -> ] (11-05-2011 15:26 )Scottishbloke Wrote: [ -> ]getting just a bit old and tired now *snip* change your record for once
Oh, sweet irony!
lol that's true poetic justice, bravo i salute you sir
(11-05-2011 15:58 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]You change your f*****g record as well as your constant going on about babes not going naked is getting really f*****g annoying!!!!!!!. You clearly don't get the point of the babechannels. They are about PHONE SEX!!!!! with a bit of visual stimulation.
There is more to an erotic show than just going naked ASAP. It's also boring if a babe goes naked straight away. I like the babe to start off in sexy lingerie and gradually remove it until she's naked. Also a babe in just a tiny thong can put on a better show than a naked babe as she can get into more positions without getting in trouble.
rammy are you the man from ofcom in disguise?
Its clear that there are strong views being expressed on this thread - no doubt they are sincerely held but - can we have some rest from it now please. Its a shame to have to skip through some of the posts because we know what they will say. Everyone is entitled to their view but I'm guessing that these recent exchanges are not likley to change members points of view.
(12-05-2011 06:52 )Scottishbloke Wrote: [ -> ]All I can say is at least I speak the truth here,
that's a matter of opinion, i think you are someone with an agenda who will twist things to back it up
(12-05-2011 06:52 )Scottishbloke Wrote: [ -> ]like I said Rammy can go and share his views with Johnny Foreigner, I'm sure on the continent they would be more than happy to settle for UK type censorship
as for going on about europe all the time what is the point, we are in the uk and have to deal with the uk rules,
(12-05-2011 00:23 )oooxooo Wrote: [ -> ] (11-05-2011 15:58 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]You change your f*****g record as well as your constant going on about babes not going naked is getting really f*****g annoying!!!!!!!. You clearly don't get the point of the babechannels. They are about PHONE SEX!!!!! with a bit of visual stimulation.
T
rammy are you the man from ofcom in disguise?
I think we have found the forum Ofcom mole it's "Rammy" !!!!!!! , strange how it's the channels that "Rammyrascal" watches that are the ones who get reported to Ofcom , then again he does watch them all lol , there is one thing for sure Ofcom will be pleased when they read his posts especially remarks like "they are about PHONE SEX!!!!! with a bit of visual stimulation" , which is technically what the are supposed to be , but if Ofcom read posts on here made by people that are quite happy to watch non naked girls and expect only to see "a bit of visual stimulation" then it could give Ofcom some encouragement to ban nakedness altogether and tame down the shows even more and spoil it for us naked lovers , so do the more clothed lovers really want this to happen ? , not saying these type of comments will make any difference but they may well give Ofcom some satisfaction .
"Rammy" i know you are not the Ofcom mole that statement was made in jest but new members that may not know you very well could jump to that conclusion by reading some of your post's .
PS i have a suspicion that you may actually like the girls to go naked yourself from time to time .
