The UK Babe Channels Forum

I think the real blame lies with Studio 66tv - but let's draw a line under this and move on...mind you I'd like to see Lola lightly whacked with a copy of Woman's Weekly on her considerably beautiful bare bottom!

(17-02-2020 14:21 )winsaw Wrote: [ -> ]it should have been an easy to sort out situation with something like a short free pussy play show to make up for it and all would be forgotten,

She did do that, with some fingering for good measure.

It took her way too long to realise though. And by the time she did it, it was like trying to put Notre Dame out with a bucket of water.

The word scamming seems to have heightened feelings all round here. I don't believe the word was ever justified in this case. But I do wonder if Lola's (it has to be said defensive and ill-advisedly phrased) tweet was a reaction to such talk?

Instead, Stemmw's assessment of what she was trying to do last night feels right to me. Note that doesn't absolve her of all responsibility. It just makes her approach symptomatic of a wider problem in the industry atm. And its a simple one that can affect any business at that.

Customer service in any form is about understanding your consumer and having a assured feel for what does and doesn't form the saleable in your product. These Tip Goals have laid bear that the general feeling at 66 for what a mainstream audience will find acceptable, via this surprisingly 'different' concept, is decidedly shaky. There's a distinct lack of sympathy for the group audience's expectations of a) how these things should excite and b) how they should function on a basic practical level. Time and again 66 babes have shown they struggle 'pitch' goals in that way gets taken up by those logged in - in both tone and ££. It's looking distinctly institutional by now - with their conception of what represents VFM for one off events also looking iffy. (No premium service is immune from the yoke of the VFM concept.)

I'd be prepared to bet this latest goal was just something Lola thought would be amusing and that guys would get a kick out of. But, as on the night when the phones were out, there was a total mis-read of audience mood...

There's nothing actively wrong with doing quick fun goals to pass a slow patch in a shift but 2000 credit jobbies are naturally elevated like they are going to be 20 min to half hour centre pieces at least and then... To turn one out as a jokey 5 minute throwaway after making guys slavate with salacious scenarios in their heads for 90 minutes "set up" time (another ridiculously engineered contrivance they need to get past) was only ever going result in the reaction it got on chat. 

So yes it's very rare, and therefore forgivable, for this babe to be caught up in any mis-steps onscreen but they are currently so prevalent at 66 regarding these goals that it's not exactly unexpected is it? If only they would learn from mistakes instead of being belligerent about them... If you don't identify what the customer will be happy with and fail to match his expectations you will always fail miserably at your customer service and end up with a wealth of entirely corrosive dissatisfaction into the bargain. That really isn't something that can be shrugged off with a few words.

(17-02-2020 19:34 )darren73 Wrote: [ -> ]I think it's now time to put this discussion to bed now and move on I think lola had good intentions with the tip goal but it went a bit side ways I think she will learn from it as I've been chatting with her this evening she really seams really down in herself she just wanted to have fun
I hope every one will give her a chance to come back from this unfortunate situation

Tbh the only thing wrong with it was the price and the time it took. It should have been 500 at the very most and if it had been done right away I think most people would have been relatively happy and moved on.

Apologies for the late intervention. I have had a long day at work.

Expectation can be a blessing or a curse.
Last night it was the latter.
The expectation was created by what had occurred just a few nights before where Lola put on a raunchy, sensual masterclass of huge erotic power with no restrictions.
Last night went for a change of tone and mood.
This in itself is not a wholly unworthy move in principle.
It ultimately turned into a miscalculation. And why?
Because it belied Lola's best qualities to the point of dispensing with them.
Lola is at her best when she is at her most sensual, most sexual and most intense.
To combine that with some fun and frolics would have been a complicated feat but a noble one. Alas there was no combination in play. It was all supposed fun and frolic but no sexual enticement. But it turned sour and backfired horribly.
Things were not helped of course by the somewhat Frank Spenceresque execution of the water balloon throwing.
There was a bit of target missing going on .

I was disappointed by last night and had sympathy with the tippers to a point.
It was a bad idea executed woefully.
However........any suggestion that Lola deliberately set out to scam or deceive or rip people off is wrong. The feeling I got from the chat last night indicated such feelings.
That is something I cannot and will not condone.
To bring into question the integrity of a two time Ultimate Babe whose nature it has always been to epitomize honesty of endeavour leaves me bewildered.
Lola has consistently set out with the noblest of intention.
That much has always been clear to me in all the telephonic, social media and onlyfans exchanges I have had with her.
The integrity of the channels and their conduct has rightly been brought into question as has the behaviour of some babes.
But Lola is far from an egotistical rip off merchant.
In so many ways she embodies every human quality and natural nightshow quality every babe should aspire to have. For anyone to attempt to tarnish that with misguided allegations of scam and betrayal of tippers is several miles too far down a very wrong road. There is a huge difference between an honest error against the backdrop of previous excellence and a notion of deliberate skullduggery.
The chat of course can turn febrile as it did last night in quite wreckless fashion.
Consequences of ill conceived thoughts in the heat of the moment can be potentially disastrous. Some folk would do well to remember that.
I get a sense of people playing the woman and not the ball.

If last night were to go to VAR it would perhaps be more of a review for offside as comical as a lot of those are rather than a review for serious foul play and a potential red card. Last night was a blunder but not a betrayal.
Lola's fundamental qualities remain intact.
Her integrity does likewise in spite of any allegation to the contrary.

A number of minutes of buffoonery and clownery does not and should not suggest otherwise.

^ As usual Snookered arrives to be the hero we all need but not the one we deserve

Yeah but did he have to use so many words when a few would have done -he is capable of that. I think people are taking this too seriously, she made an error or rather Studio made it, underestimated the outcry it would cause and I'd put it down to naivety. Next time she's on, we will see what happens.

Surely a key factor in the ire of the punters was that they assumed get me wet was referring to her pussy, not a water fight?

Don't worry Lola, Alice Goodwin is on tonight. The unruly mob will move on to her so you can relax now

The chatters were still talking about it tonight, asking for assurances about future tip goals.