Seems a bit odd if you've got a very popular girl like Lola to just put on the Web for a ten-minute pussy rub or toast-eating session and then put her back on the television screen - surely with someone like that and the performer that she is it would be better to give her at least half an hour to an hour - look at Alice, she stays on for bloody hours doing the same thing with Mr P, whereas Lola would be able to get going solo and really show what she can do(as she has done countless times in the past.)
^ Yeah it's been happening the entire time they have been doing web shows. Lola gets barely any time. Instead it goes to someone using the toy sitting or lying in one position, or goes to someone playing for perv cam for ages with just a static top half on show.
S66 seriously have no clue how to make the most of their shows. If Lola was given just 60-90 minutes per night show on the web to do her thing it would make all the difference. Even more so if other babes followed in Lola's footsteps, obviously no one wants to see all babes do the same shows but more imagination, movement, energy, sense of fun and creativity would do wonders and the crew/producers/management should go all out to help and encourage this, but they don't bother for the most part.
(20-01-2020 20:47 )ShandyHand Wrote: [ -> ]This thread continues to be the fascinating read of those concerning the 66 shows atm. Keep up the good work in documenting this stuff lads, it's appreciated.
(20-01-2020 02:11 )snookered Wrote: [ -> ]Yes I very much suspect it is S66 and NOT Lola
This does seem the most likely background for what you guys saw last night. Some boss (or two) didn't like the implications of what Lola had slipped into doing these things. Why else overule the babe's (as Steemw confirmed earlier, now weeks' long) established and clear inclination to do her goals 'fta'? As ever, there seems the implication that things get (peevishly?) corrected back to company policy at 66 only after a show makes a little splash of publicity on this forum! Winsaw appears right on the 66 thread: It takes some insiders a long time to admit things have moved on.
Hopefully Lola's latest thong artifact - toast! - will soon be proved as a metaphor for some bts' overly protectionist thinking here. 
(20-01-2020 02:40 )Stemmw Wrote: [ -> ]... decided by whichever clown is running the show on that specific night. I feel there was a different person in charge Thursday when Lola did her epic stint. Could be wrong but it has always felt like this going back months and years. one night the women on tv would have a lot of freedom, decent camera work, then the next night with the same women is no movement and head shot only, then back again 
...
Also bang on IMO. I've long sensed the same based on what we see onscreen from the same babes on consecutive shifts (even sometimes ones on the same day a week later). And it is indeed most noticable (because the crew have more input) on nights.
It is only realistic to assume some crews have more creativity, greater independent thought, than others. They are more confident to go with a vibe of a progressive, sparking show - to let it take it's natural course; more inclined to give the babe her head if things feel right in the moment, etc. They are more likely to trust the babe knows what she is doing. In other words they may well look to get the right results even if it means rubbing against the boring standard m.o.
Lesser crews, otoh, would be more likely to just stick to what they've been told works best most often (the denial of properly erotic visuals inspiring greater cam use mainly). They stick to this rule no matter what might be instinctual to the babe or what might occur unexpectedly on the night. This type crew member tends to doubt the babe, thinking she will run into trouble for showing too much and so pull her back to play safe. They have no real feeling for the punter or what works on a show, they just produce by rote. Directing things in this fashion these crews are far more likely to churn out the duller, deader, shows from the punters pov. The babes just don't stand as much chance of getting the same quality through.
I agree that it seems to be a trust issue, perhaps the particular behind the scenes crew got the channel in trouble previously and are unwilling to take the risk anymore. this can be seen by the panicked way they cut the tv feeds on sky ( i don't have freeview so i can't comment on the feed there). It could cycle between a test card and two or more other presenters before settling, and might return to the original feed within a couple of minutes. That is not the actions of behind the scenes staff that either know what they are doing or are in control of the production in my opinion.
Snookered wrote: Hopefully Lola's latest thong artifact - toast! - will soon be proved as a metaphor for some bts' overly protectionist thinking here.
Or she might just have been hungry!
(20-01-2020 23:56 )GMach1 Wrote: [ -> ]Snookered wrote: Hopefully Lola's latest thong artifact - toast! - will soon be proved as a metaphor for some bts' overly protectionist thinking here.
Or she might just have been hungry!
Ha yeah just a quick a snack last night as Lola only took ten minutes for her break after a 2 hour stint and then did 2-plus more hours before an actual break. Snacking on the go.
My apologies. I am sure anyone would want to nibble her
Nice!
Wow the nude pics are incredible
Tip goal up.
2500 for an oiled up naked work out.
Nowt so far
(24-01-2020 00:21 )snookered Wrote: [ -> ]Tip goal up.
2500 for an oiled up naked work out.
Nowt so far
If she states that it will be open leg to main cam then it will move, I can't ask her though as I can't log in to my S66 account
