The UK Babe Channels Forum

Full Version: Dirty Site Makes Dirty Women
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
You mean a laptop webcam picture? You're not going to reverse psychology me into showing you all of myself just because you can't imagine a woman to be into anything kinky, in which case, you must think you are fucked up to be into anything.
So onely, no interest, even after all this time. Sad Need to get used. Abused. Damaged.
I'd love to make you my little fuckwhore use all those holes until they are red raw, cum and then start all other again.
Well cum on up to Scotland for a weekend val. ur ass would be red raw
(10-12-2014 22:07 )ValerieC Wrote: [ -> ]So onely, no interest, even after all this time. Sad Need to get used. Abused. Damaged.

[Image: image-3A1E_5498C230.jpg]

Link --> http://gallys.realitykings.com/ft/111/?id=relaxtraffic <-- Link
That is true, but so is everything i've said and everything i've posted in regards to who I am and how I look.
So, you're implying that the picture you posted is you - a picture which is easily traceable on the internet to find (unedited) in the link I provided. You have also presented yourself as a totally gagging for it, up for anything, kinky female......and yet you have a problem with posting an unedited picture of yourself (the one you posted comes from the afore mentioned set linked to earlier, in which you decided to blank out the face and nipples(?!?!)).

Why I have a problem with this is because you decided to have a go at somebody who merely stated that he wasn't willing to simply take you at your word (a totally reasonable stance online). Now, if you were anything like what you claim to be, I cannot see any logical reason as to why you wouldn't just post a pic of/link to the set of pictures from a recognised porn company if they were indeed of you - or why you would have a problem proving you are what you claim, given your (supposed) willingness and history of doing porn shoots. All this creates is the rather apparent impression that the only logical conclusion is that you are not who you say you are.

This may be right/wrong/whatever, but the simple fact is: those of us who have been on this forum for a number of years have had numerous run ins with guys pretending to be women (some more unhinged than others, some positively batshit mental). Like it or not, that means many people will treat you with suspicion. All you've done is make it all the more easy to not believe you.
Because of who I am, and because I no longer do that work due to my family, and I used those pictures rather than private pictures because of what you just said. It allows plausible deniability. If someone if interested though, and serious, I am more than willing, and more than happy to show them a private picture.
i'm confused, are you saying you're austin kincaid?
Lines are there to read between.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Reference URL's