The UK Babe Channels Forum

(30-12-2014 20:58 )ValerieC Wrote: [ -> ]Everything I have said makes sense, it just doesn't to you, and you seem to believe that is the adjudicating principle. You clearly have an ego problem, self evident in your statement about not caring if another user says I am genuine. I think you could do without the chips by the look of it, you're a troll with a pun and an ego problem.

You're the person having to resort to personal attacks......

After relentlessly being told I am a liar, being insulted, that I have not made sense and then to be told, even when it is counter productive to why I did this in the first place, but I would prove who I was and you say that's not good enough. That wears on you after a couple of days. I'm sorry for insulting you, genuinely, but that is why I did, but I'm sure you won't understand that stance either.

I've never said you're a liar (never said whether I think that or not). I've pointed out that your points haven't made sense and have often been contradictory. For example, if you 'prove' you are who you say you are, how can you maintain "plausible deniability"? Everything you say and do contradicts what came before.

I have also never once asked for proof, other people have. However, why would something being 'proved' to someone else automatically mean I have to believe it? I don't know Biggles well enough to take his word for it. I don't know what, if anything, he may have to gain from 'verifying' you. He could be you for all I know. Not saying he is, not saying he isn't. How the hell would I know?

(30-12-2014 21:20 )ValerieC Wrote: [ -> ]I'm sorry for insulting you, genuinely, but that is why I did, but I'm sure you won't understand that stance either.

If you have to add this, it kinda detracts from the apology*



*Just saying

I didn't want anyone to know who I was because I wanted to be able to be just another person, however, after all this, I clearly have to prove myself to appease you all or I will be unable to use this forum, clearly. So, I have to verify myself, not because I want that but because otherwise I can't use this forum can I.

could I ask for a breakdown of this breakdown?

It's quite wordy.

(31-12-2014 01:07 )RatedR Wrote: [ -> ]could I ask for a breakdown of this breakdown?

It's quite wordy.

ValerieC is Austin Kincaid ( ) I called him on it and has been talking sideways ever since.


PS. Want to prove yourself without posting pictures? should be pretty easy log into your twitter account (Incase you've forgotten your own twitter account : https://twitter.com/msaustinkincaid ) and put a tweet out #UKB.

Mods probably be in here to bust this thread out soon anyway.

Ladies - Valerie and Sooky. This is getting out of hand a little. I'm happy to help out if needed and frankly get this thread back to what it was about which was how this forum frees up the sexual ideas and fantasies that some of us have.

Alternatively Sooky and Valerie can get in an inflatable pool and mud wrestle, I'll film it (hopefully getting involved too) - see back to fantasy

Kinda spoils the fantasy, if one of the 'ladies' might be in drag

Anyway, don't mind me ........ carry on

*reaches for popcorn*

(31-12-2014 01:07 )RatedR Wrote: [ -> ]could I ask for a breakdown of this breakdown?

It's quite wordy.

As I see it :

1. Dude comes on forum pretending to be a horny girl using porn stars pics.
2. Dumb guys get boners thinking they might get some action.
3. Guy gets called out and tries to squirm out of it by pretending to be the porn star 'undercover'.

Simples

Saddest part of the whole affair is point 2, the number of guys who fall for this kind of thing without questioning it.

They made both their Valerie and Austin guises mad for consistency. It really is an astounding effort.