10-01-2015, 14:03
No I was trying to say that if I wasn't being truthful I could have implied she had sent me a picture but hadn't as Sooky was commenting about the delay in receiving or commenting here about it.
(10-01-2015 14:03 )biggles Wrote: [ -> ]I could have implied she had sent me a picture but hadn't
(31-12-2014 10:33 )munch1917 Wrote: [ -> ](31-12-2014 01:07 )RatedR Wrote: [ -> ]could I ask for a breakdown of this breakdown?
It's quite wordy.
As I see it :
1. Dude comes on forum pretending to be a horny girl using porn stars pics.
2. Dumb guys get boners thinking they might get some action.
3. Guy gets called out and tries to squirm out of it by pretending to be the porn star 'undercover'.
Simples
Saddest part of the whole affair is point 2, the number of guys who fall for this kind of thing without questioning it.
(10-01-2015 13:08 )biggles Wrote: [ -> ]Quote:
I didn't realise you both had to be online in order for a pm/email to be sent (you do understand how the internet works, don't you?)
Yes however you do need to be online to be able to reply so if Person A sends and email on day 1 but person B doesn't read it until day 3 there is going to be a lag, especially if a reply is required.
(30-12-2014 19:26 )ValerieC Wrote: [ -> ]So repeatedly offensive and condescending, had enough of it. I expect a proper apology too because it's not like I can't prove it, is it? So, when Biggles gets back to me, you'll have your answer won't you.
(31-12-2014 09:11 )biggles Wrote: [ -> ]Ladies - Valerie and Sooky. This is getting out of hand a little. [rest of post here]
(01-01-2015 09:24 )biggles Wrote: [ -> ]Just a side point since when on this forum has it been necessary for anyone to justify who they are or anything regarding their personal life and reasons for being on this website. [rest of post here]
(07-01-2015 00:04 )biggles Wrote: [ -> ]Good evening everybody.
Valerie has emailed me a photograph of HERSELF as it seems nothing other than this would stop the doubters regarding HER sexuality. [rest of post here]
(11-01-2015 05:08 )ValerieC Wrote: [ -> ]Just read through the posts I haven't read as not been in this thread for a couple of weeks
(07-01-2015 00:04 )biggles Wrote: [ -> ]Good evening everybody.
Valerie has emailed me a photograph of HERSELF as it seems nothing other than this would stop the doubters regarding HER sexuality. It's not a picture from the web and it's not for me to distribute either. a lot of things have been said hotly in the heat of the moment which on reflection I'm sure most of us regret - lets wipe the slate clean regarding that.
Questioning who someone is or why they here should not be part of this forum and should stop hence forward, lets move the mass debate back to the theme here which I'm sure most will find more entertaining and a lot more satisfying.
I'm looking forward to the proposed chocolate mud wrestle between the gals with me as the lucky winners prize to lick them clean
(09-01-2015 13:40 )setter1000 Wrote: [ -> ](30-12-2014 21:30 )ValerieC Wrote: [ -> ]I didn't want anyone to know who I was because I wanted to be able to be just another person, however, after all this, I clearly have to prove myself to appease you all or I will be unable to use this forum, clearly. So, I have to verify myself, not because I want that but because otherwise I can't use this forum can I.
I'm sorry I'm not trying to gang up on anyone, but why would an American pornstar come on here in the first place? I'm sure there are many sex chat sites could go on in cognito.
If looking for for sexual fantasy why put any pics of a women up?
Why not just register as a female if you are one and pm pics of self, to guys you might get close to on here? Old trick is to show pic with head out of shot and have some users name written on arm. That way you prove you are female even if you don't want people to know your true female identity.