The UK Babe Channels Forum

Full Version: Dirty Site Makes Dirty Women
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
(11-01-2015 12:49 )SOCATOA Wrote: [ -> ]Once knew a working girl called Cognito, she was a busy girlWink

worst limerick ever! Big Grin
Just read this full tread, I pm'd Valerie when 'she' first started this thread about a 3some i had had with an ex. From 'her' reply to that I immediately though "well thats a bloke", not sure why it just seemed obvious! Still different folks/different strokes.
(11-01-2015 12:49 )SOCATOA Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-01-2015 13:40 )setter1000 Wrote: [ -> ]
(30-12-2014 21:30 )ValerieC Wrote: [ -> ]I didn't want anyone to know who I was because I wanted to be able to be just another person, however, after all this, I clearly have to prove myself to appease you all or I will be unable to use this forum, clearly. So, I have to verify myself, not because I want that but because otherwise I can't use this forum can I.

I'm sorry I'm not trying to gang up on anyone, but why would an American pornstar come on here in the first place? I'm sure there are many sex chat sites could go on in cognito.

If looking for for sexual fantasy why put any pics of a women up?
Why not just register as a female if you are one and pm pics of self, to guys you might get close to on here? Old trick is to show pic with head out of shot and have some users name written on arm. That way you prove you are female even if you don't want people to know your true female identity.

Once knew a working girl called Cognito, she was a busy girlWink
Boom boom. The grammer police strike again. Totally makes the content of my post incoherent of course. My prompting facitility on phone can't be trustedannoyed
Think that would be a brilliant porn star name myself.
(11-01-2015 12:13 )The Silent Majority Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-01-2015 05:08 )ValerieC Wrote: [ -> ]Just read through the posts I haven't read as not been in this thread for a couple of weeks

That's probably the least believable thing you've written here.

Indeed. He's been logging on regularly ever since the previous post on 30th Dec.
(11-01-2015 05:08 )ValerieC Wrote: [ -> ]Just read through the posts I haven't read as not been in this thread for a couple of weeks as it became an exercise for people to try and promote themselves above other people and make themselves feel powerful, and not surprisingly that is what I see but now on Biggles. I've done all I need to do and indeed care to do, I'll go elsewhere and you can continue your psychological projection and rejection.

1 you used a porn stars picture and passed it off as your self
2 it was proven you were using a porn stars picture and passing it off as your self
3 you than insisted that you were the said porn star being here incognito.
4 you than either directly or indirectly admitted the porn star was not you. Your age is 44 hers is 34 if bio is true.
5 you than insisted that biggles will confirm you are a women. Surprise surprise when Biggles confirmed he received authentic pictures of you but has promised not to display to other members of the forum people were not impressed.
6 since no one said 'Oh thank goodness my suspicions have been proven incorrect. Boy do I feel silyBlush hurrah for Biggles' you have decided to take the high road and seek new pastures.
I don't know if I'm being stupid but that is my take on it.
Surely you must realise after what has happened on here and other 'catfish story's' that people are very reluctant to take your word for it?

As much as I hate to gang up on anyone I'm just very much of the ilk that what seems to good to be true on the internet ends up being to good to be true. I hate to accuse people of being fake or being a gender bender but it does not look good from an impartial, observers point of view.

If you feel to indignant to want to stay on the forum, in regard to some of the accusations why not prove your authentication with a impartial moderator as been previously suggested on this thread, and than depart with a parting message, having proven your point and making the accusers look and feel stupid?
"There once was a man called Valerie Victor,
He posted a fake female picture,
But little did he know,
The lengths they would go,
To prove he was really a Mister "


Doh Rolleyes
You are pathetic and rather than repeat myself I would just point you in direction of my previous post. I won't return, so I will not see any more of your self glorifying confrontational and ill-informed opinions. I have found it amusing to what levels you seem to want to project, control and significantly judge others on this forum. It clearly means so much to you. Luckily for me, it doesn't.
So, you're not willing to talk to the mods about sending the picture you sent biggles to end this once and for all?
[Image: th?id=HN.608053187828187603&pid=15.1...60&P=0]
(11-01-2015 17:56 )ValerieC Wrote: [ -> ]It clearly means so much to you. Luckily for me, it doesn't.

Thank you for coming on here to tell us how much it doesn't mean to you Rolleyes

[Image: freecontradictionsroyal_fullpic.png]
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Reference URL's