The UK Babe Channels Forum

Full Version: BabestationX - the webshow
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
get this rubbish shut down.appeal to a wider viewer base by getting a good bsx pay to view station on sky or freeview.obviously not hard full on but giving what is allowable.ie.lovely spread pussy.bsx was ruined by a small number of past it.unwilling,unsexy.hogging girls.looks like theyre at it again.theres a lot of natural fluidity and movement in an industry like this.so what is a babestation girl?one who is fixed statue like as nobody else wants them?a great pity that so many smashing girls have been lost over the last few months.just look at the *rap that is left.its simple.get a variety of girls on a pay per night basis.get on freeview or sky as well as stream so its easy for many more people to view.leave the usual embedded rubbish well away from it!!their small band of obsessive followers have plenty of opportunity to see them on the mainstream bs stations that they so sadly dominate!!judging by the views on this forum,as well as by the very small turn over of posts and reviews,this new venture seems to be a disaster.theres a lot of people out here with good money in their wallets waiting for a bit of initiative from bs.
[quote][quote='sierraman' pid='1308610' dateline='1377419105']
get this rubbish shut down.appeal to a wider viewer base by getting a good bsx pay to view station on sky or freeview.obviously not hard full on but giving what is allowable.ie.lovely spread pussy.bsx was ruined by a small number of past it.unwilling,unsexy.hogging girls.looks like theyre at it again.theres a lot of natural fluidity and movement in an industry like this.so what is a babestation girl?one who is fixed statue like as nobody else wants them?a great pity that so many smashing girls have been lost over the last few months.just look at the *rap that is left.its simple.get a variety of girls on a pay per night basis.get on freeview or sky as well as stream so its easy for many more people to view.leave the usual embedded rubbish well away from it!!their small band of obsessive followers have plenty of opportunity to see them on the mainstream bs stations that they so sadly dominate!!judging by the views on this forum,as well as by the very small turn over of posts and reviews,this new venture seems to be a disaster.theres a lot of people out here with good money in their wallets waiting for a bit of initiative from bs.
[/quote]

if its so bad, then sierramann, why don't you move on elsewhere? you used to bleat on so much on the old forum location about how bsx needed hardcore all the time, it was tiresome, you kept the same old crap all the time, you wanted hardcore xxx all girls had to spread and play, blah blah blah
I was hoping you'd been left behind with the forum move and the BSX move to the website. BSX tried to keep your crowd happy and tried adultporn stars, and all that, and that's was the point where bsx lost the plot and lost a lot of members.
I personally believe that the lack of girls willing to appear on BSX now, is because of the last 6months, of the channel trying the harder stuff to please the minority(your crowd), and in doing so, the girls wanted to distance themselves from a channel that was pushing harder and harder stuff. And yes, I can say this with some authority because I've spoken with a number of girls who have said exactly that. That with the channel going harder, they didn't want to be seen associated with it. Can't say a blame them! it was pretty obvious that the channel was on a spiral downwards, trying to give your crowd what they wanted, even though you could get that anywhere else.

I cant believe you're suggesting going back to freeview and sky, given recent events. talk about being out of touch!
I'm hoping that bsx has learnt the lesson, gets back to what it used to be, a site for babestation girls going a bit further. We hope this will happen.
If it panders to your needs, then it may as well shut up shop now, because it tried it once and it failed.
I suggest you go back to your proudly boasted dogging sessions, and leave BSX to the members that like it as it used to be, and hopefully will be again
Sorry to everyone else if my previous post was too negative, but I find that person to be best left on the old forum. This is the new BSX forum, where we try and support, help, and grow the new BSX, pass opinions, criticise when they get it wrong, and generally chat about the new BSX. Its not that old BSX. Lets keep the two separate, a new beginning.
I agree with some comments about bsx, comparing to what we can see with sexstation to what bsx offers. I suggest to stick with sexstation if you want more hardcore. I have tried out bsx few times and it is very tame, some girls try to push the limit but the cameraman will pan away. What I do not get is why they did G/G webcam shows and was on bsx for 30minutes? this was couple of weeks ago/ last month. I know it is a business and they need to generate money but most of the g/g shows are a con IMO especially certain models ( I will refrain saying the names ) do not show any explicit views. As for BSX I really hope after they move to new location, they will improve this feature otherwise I will not be spending anymore on them.
I NEVER asked for full on hard so please don't twist the truth.obviously pussy was allowed and that's what me and a lot like me asked for and paid for.not girls like lori and tiffany who falsly advertised hard stuff but delivered nothing.you really ought to get used to the idea that this is an open forum and and that people are entitled to their opinion even if its different to yours.vilifying and slandering anyone who disagrees will not make them go away.anyway ill leave it for a while and see what happens.personally to me it looks like they are flogging a dead horse here.hopefully they will soon give us a better alternative that is more profitable for bs and suitable for a wider viewer base that gives more people easier opportunity to view and be involved.id love to see some girls like queen Jayne.ava.ree petra,rio lee and so on return and not be frozen out this time by the selfish few we are saddled with at the moment.time will tell.bye for now.
(25-08-2013 11:17 )harri Wrote: [ -> ]I agree with some comments about bsx, comparing to what we can see with sexstation to what bsx offers. I suggest to stick with sexstation if you want more hardcore. I have tried out bsx few times and it is very tame, some girls try to push the limit but the cameraman will pan away. What I do not get is why they did G/G webcam shows and was on bsx for 30minutes? this was couple of weeks ago/ last month. I know it is a business and they need to generate money but most of the g/g shows are a con IMO especially certain models ( I will refrain saying the names ) do not show any explicit views. As for BSX I really hope after they move to new location, they will improve this feature otherwise I will not be spending anymore on them.

Harri, are you referring to the BSX that was on freeview, or the new BSX that's website only? I know what you mean about the freeview version, but we are led to believe that was because of the authorities cracking down, there's similar complaints on other channels forums. I suppose there's nothing we can do about the authority's nanny state mentality Sad
(25-08-2013 11:47 )welshken Wrote: [ -> ]
(25-08-2013 11:17 )harri Wrote: [ -> ]I agree with some comments about bsx, comparing to what we can see with sexstation to what bsx offers. I suggest to stick with sexstation if you want more hardcore. I have tried out bsx few times and it is very tame, some girls try to push the limit but the cameraman will pan away. What I do not get is why they did G/G webcam shows and was on bsx for 30minutes? this was couple of weeks ago/ last month. I know it is a business and they need to generate money but most of the g/g shows are a con IMO especially certain models ( I will refrain saying the names ) do not show any explicit views. As for BSX I really hope after they move to new location, they will improve this feature otherwise I will not be spending anymore on them.

Harri, are you referring to the BSX that was on freeview, or the new BSX that's website only? I know what you mean about the freeview version, but we are led to believe that was because of the authorities cracking down, there's similar complaints on other channels forums. I suppose there's nothing we can do about the authority's nanny state mentality Sad

Both, the bsx shows need improving or change the system to do only bsx webcam shows via the bs cam sites?? so members can get better explicit viewing or action. bsx does not allow insertion shown which I think is very very annoying. Off topic the Cams need improving too.
All this fighting between ourselves is unecessary,i think we will have to agree to differ on the way bsx moves forward,its seems to me that whether they stick to the current way of operating and producing their show or make changes its unlikely we will all feel happy with them,i for example dont like fact you have to join the site to watch and someone else may be happy to join so i would have to respect their opinion and would expect them to respect mine,also seems interesting that no-one has posted a review on last nights show.
(25-08-2013 10:36 )welshken Wrote: [ -> ]I personally believe that the lack of girls willing to appear on BSX now, is because of the last 6months, of the channel trying the harder stuff to please the minority(your crowd), and in doing so, the girls wanted to distance themselves from a channel that was pushing harder and harder stuff.

To be fair that problem has always existed. Since day one of the channel there were girls who didn't want to appear on it. Some girls wouldn't appear simply because of the original name Babestation Xtreme. Lack of Babestation girls willing to appear on the channel is the norm and nothing new. I don't think the channel has pushed harder and harder stuff either. The last 6 months have not been as hard in content as what they were doing 2 to 3 years ago. Look at the caps threads for confirmation of this. Content has varied over the lifetime of the channel, always being up and down, and the last 6 months have not been particularly harder stuff.
(25-08-2013 15:17 )aaron Wrote: [ -> ]Some girls wouldn't appear simply because of the original name Babestation Xtreme.

Yes I heard that too. One of the reasons for the name change to BabestationX was to encourage more Babestation girls to appear on the channel, although I don't that idea had much success. Plus many girls who did appear got generally negative reviews which made them want to avoid making any further appearances, and that was a problem before the last 6 months..
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
Reference URL's