(09-08-2013 14:28 )sierraman Wrote: [ -> ]saw that the terrible twins lori and geri were advertised last night.just having a brief look to see if anybody did tune in and post a review. I wouldnt imagine any other station in their right mind would want them anywhere near.about time they both retired now.
never knew lori and geri were twins
actually, to be fair, Geri has been flashing a lot more recently!
Lori, no comment
(09-08-2013 19:11 )FarewellBSX Wrote: [ -> ]and as for hardcore explicit sex, you have the sexstation shows, via the BSX site, so why not allow bsx to give the rest of us what we want?
Yer that is a good point, the Sexstation Unleashed Hardcore B/G shows are free to BSX members... including quite a few Archives....worth mentioning.
(09-08-2013 19:11 )FarewellBSX Wrote: [ -> ]you want to rubbish the site
Why do you assume that softcore has to be rubbish? Some of us are quite happy watching softcore.
Well at the minute on the babestation website, the BSX stream for members is just playing the Babestation stream with Lori, I hope they sort it out for the start of the show tonight
(09-08-2013 20:04 )aaron Wrote: [ -> ] (09-08-2013 19:11 )FarewellBSX Wrote: [ -> ]you want to rubbish the site
Why do you assume that softcore has to be rubbish? Some of us are quite happy watching softcore.
fair point, and I will agree, I do like the softcore too, but it does seem that some are trying to make out the site is going to be more tame that it is, and by saying that its softcore, it may put some off, that are looking for open legs etc.
I suppose its how you define softcore. For me, softcore is plain nude, legs closed, like we can see on the FTA, so in that respect, although the site does show some softcore, it also offers hardcore aswell
(09-08-2013 21:14 )FarewellBSX Wrote: [ -> ]I suppose its how you define softcore. For me, softcore is plain nude, legs closed, like we can see on the FTA
I'm sorry, but I can't be having that. Hardcore porn is the depiction of sexual acts. Some sexual act has to be occurring for material to be classed as hardcore. Nudity alone is never hardcore and legs closed or not makes no difference. If the material is just showing the human body and nothing more then it's decidedly softcore.
Not looking like I'll be watching tonight as the stream on the babestation website is fucked for me tonight unless it gets sorted before 11, to think I turned down a lads night out, i could have been 10 sheets to the wind by now
(09-08-2013 21:49 )fucu2 Wrote: [ -> ]Not looking like I'll be watching tonight as the stream on the babestation website is fucked for me tonight unless it gets sorted before 11, to think I turned down a lads night out, i could have been 10 sheets to the wind by now
its working OK for me, at 22.01
although its showing Lori, so maybe that's why you think its fucked lol.
but seriously, the feed is OK here!
(09-08-2013 21:46 )marlowe Wrote: [ -> ] (09-08-2013 21:14 )FarewellBSX Wrote: [ -> ]I suppose its how you define softcore. For me, softcore is plain nude, legs closed, like we can see on the FTA
I'm sorry, but I can't be having that. Hardcore porn is the depiction of sexual acts. Some sexual act has to be occurring for material to be classed as hardcore. Nudity alone is never hardcore and legs closed or not makes no difference. If the material is just showing the human body and nothing more then it's decidedly softcore.
I guess that just proves we all see the definitions of levels as different. I don't think there's ever been a fixed level at which softcore becomes hardcore, I guess we all see it differently. and maybe why we can say BSX is softcore and hardcore, its how you define hardcore.
For me softcore is topless and plain nude, but open leg seems a bit more that softcore, but we each measure it differently
(09-08-2013 22:02 )FarewellBSX Wrote: [ -> ]its working OK for me, at 22.01
It's not working for me, at 22:22