(08-08-2013 13:45 )SteveHG Wrote: [ -> ]They need to get away from the obsession with people phoning in.
The shows are meant to be interactive though so they need calls to make the show format work.
saw that the terrible twins lori and geri were advertised last night.just having a brief look to see if anybody did tune in and post a review. I wouldnt imagine any other station in their right mind would want them anywhere near.about time they both retired now.
(09-08-2013 14:28 )sierraman Wrote: [ -> ]just having a brief look to see if anybody did tune in and post a review
There won't be any reviews from last night because the live shows are now on Friday and Saturday only.
(09-08-2013 12:37 )marlowe Wrote: [ -> ] (08-08-2013 13:45 )SteveHG Wrote: [ -> ]They need to get away from the obsession with people phoning in.
The shows are meant to be interactive though so they need calls to make the show format work.
Until they get a bigger viewing audience, that is not gonna work. remember that normal Babestation has a large audience to pull its callers from, because watching it is free. BSX only has the paid site members or people who have paid for the show to pull its callers from.
That said there is no reason that the girl of the night cant give a good show. some girls on the fta channels give their best performances when the phones are quiet, where as some just lay there if the phones are quiet. It depends on the girl.
As I said in an earlier post, my view is that the girls have a paying audience already to perform for, the calls should be a bonus. If we were not paying for the membership or shows, then fair enough, but we are, so the show should still go ahead wether there is a call or not.
(09-08-2013 06:56 )SCIROCCO Wrote: [ -> ]I'll pass on both counts this weekend. Neither girls do anything more than open leg. I had hoped the move to web only meant explicit hardcore sex but apart from one night of dildo action from Dionne the output has been tame. BSX will not compete with Shebang if there is no real sex. Flashing the gash is old school and the product on offer has moved on.
To be fair I dont think they are trying to compete with Shebang. The idea is to use Babestation girls with no restrictions. Now the girls have their own limits, but their are no restrictions from the top so to speak. The problem before was, that even if the babe was feeling extra frisky, the cameraman would self censor, this thankfully should happen a lot less now.
Also if they were only gonna do penetration, then it would be the same couple of girls all the time, or they would need to get in porn stars. The whole point would be lost, cause we dont want just a porn site, we want to see the girls from the telly going further than they do on screen.
Agreed if you want Hardcore Porn this is not specifically the right place for you. However If you want to see Babestation babes and TV models showing more with no censorship (other than what the girls are prepared to do), then fill your boots.
I am personally happy with how it is going so far, but I know not all will agree with me. Dont get me wrong, I like to see penetration if possible, and some like Dionne, may come thru, but if they put hot chicks like Savannah etc on there, they are not allways gonna be full hardcore, or they would all be off making porn films rather than being on TV. Having said that, the fact that I am gonna see Savannah playing with her pussy, is good enough for me.....subject to decent camera work ofc tho! I guess the point is that if the babe decides she wants to push the limits, she now can! In a way that adds to the excitment in my view. If every girl did the same level from start to finish, it would get a little predictable...
As you say, if you just want guarenteed Hardcore sex , then Shebang is maybe more your place....
(09-08-2013 17:04 )saviour123 Wrote: [ -> ]the girls have a paying audience already to perform for
The paying audience aren't paying very much though. The price is very cheap you must admit. I suspect that without calls to the shows BabestationX wouldn't be a viable product.
(09-08-2013 14:28 )sierraman Wrote: [ -> ]saw that the terrible twins lori and geri were advertised last night.just having a brief look to see if anybody did tune in and post a review. I wouldnt imagine any other station in their right mind would want them anywhere near.about time they both retired now.
Yer I think it was just on the BS Cams matey, did nt see them on BSX. I may be wrong however.... I usually am
I hope there's not going to be a balls up with the camera work tonight cause if there is the bsx cam guys need a toe up the ass....
(09-08-2013 17:22 )barracuda Wrote: [ -> ] (09-08-2013 17:04 )saviour123 Wrote: [ -> ]the girls have a paying audience already to perform for
The paying audience aren't paying very much though. The price is very cheap you must admit. I suspect that without calls to the shows BabestationX wouldn't be a viable product.
I agree, although I pay the monthly fee, rather than the nightly one. I imagine the current price is to get the customers in the first place. Once the product is good,working, and has lots of viewers, then I expect the cost to rise. I used to pay £5 per show, and would be happy to pay a similar ammount for a good show.
However in my view making the product adapt to the 75p a night price tag would be crazy, as lets face it, you get what you pay for. As far as the calls are concerned, unless they get more people to sign up, they will not happen, and the way to get people to sign up is to put on good shows, not blackmailing people who have paid once to phone in or they will not get to see anything......
Remember when they ask people to call, it is not the free to air who see it, only the people who have paid for the show. Also people need to realize that when they lost their freeview audience, they probably lost 90% of the audience. They need to get those people back and on the net before they start worrying about the phones. Once that happens the calls will come naturally due the the higher number of viewers. Just my 2cents
(09-08-2013 10:31 )aaron Wrote: [ -> ] (09-08-2013 06:56 )SCIROCCO Wrote: [ -> ]I had hoped the move to web only meant explicit hardcore sex
To be fair they did say from the start of the web only shows that this wasn't the case and that BabestationX was going to remain a softcore show.
Actually, no they didn't.
whats been said and is obvious is that they cant be advertsing a hardcore site, on the TV channels, due to current rules
Anyone thinking that BSX is only a softcore site either hasn't even looked or is clearly working for a rival site!
so far we've had all open leg and one incidence of insertion BUT its still early days.
there seems to be a few that just want to make false claims about the site, so I'd ask anyone making any of these claims, to state when they have actually accessed the site and sampled the wares?
Its a fair request, you want to rubbish the site, so tell us what you saw to back your claims
and as for hardcore explicit sex, you have the sexstation shows, via the BSX site, so why not allow bsx to give the rest of us what we want?