splitting what the channel makes/broadcasts so the UK ends up with it's own channel showing a different show to that in Germany for example could be the beginning of the end for the UK operation as i guess it would show up quite fast how little the UK market is making them,
had a look for the first time last night at about 330 one girl on fully clothed not moving then looked at the competition at that end of the EPG boobs out, girls people know with a fan base and a lot cheaper to call,
when the channel relaunches next week they need to cut the price to 60p have 2 girls on with there boobs out all night then they may start to get more callers if they keep on how they are going they will not last long
I recognized, that the Eurobabes Websites has no Wall.....
Here is a interesting Sentence....
"After the inevitable period of adjusting and getting used to our new broadcasting we found a way to keep the current levels of erotica and with slight changes to satisfy both our new broadcasters and our viewers. This idea will be implemented next week and the way to do it is by implementing a new system for simulcast and dividing the signal, and switching the feed for different territories and the internet. By doing this we will try to please everyone and still be able to follow our aesthetic searches and plans. The issue is not how hot or soft our program is, but how smart and interesting it is"
If the Show is soft, then it can get really fast boring, so there is no excuse about an interesting program...
But what is aesthetic? Only in the ETV way, or is a model who is a bit nastier not aesthetic?
And why change the internetprogram? The issue is only the TV Channel or not? Or can ofcom also say to your Website was is right or wrong?
I did find something last night it's good for, it can cure insomnia !!, after a few minutes of watching this I fell asleep
The rest of that wonderful 'editorial' makes for fascinating reading.
Now if their income really has increased why do they feel they, after one week, need to change this winning formula ?
What they probably forget that their expenses have also increased any probably even more than their 'magical' increase in revenue. You really do not need an masters degree in economics to work this one out.
And add the possible shalacking they got from Cellcast from the illegal promotion of their website. If such promotion was possible then all UK channels would do likewise. That, I believe, is the explanation regards the 'internet' bit.
The number of times I have read this 'aesthetic' excuse makes me run out of fingers and toes. Once they were even brazen enough to claim it did not matter if they made money. "We just did it for the 'art' and 'self enjoyment'
ETV may not be in it for the money. Methinks Cellcast have a different agenda.
The 'simulcast' - they may not be using the right word there since that is what they are doing right now - is along the lines I expected. At one time when their internet service started, they had the girl who did the internet show in one corner of the studio but far enough away from the live feed. All they then need to do something similar, even with more than one girl is to provide another IP feed to BS instead of the current one. They can even switch the girls around as appearing in the European show so the UK gets to meet them all but a little more up close and personal.
I expect the pressure for change is two fold. One from their partner and two, which they will never admit to, from models and staff. Remember that the girls are not paid the same regardless. They earn from call volume. Their moderators earn from SMS volume. At their next pay-day, despite their extravagant claims, there could be a lot of un-happy faces.
I don't think ETV are actually broadcasting to us via satellite as the picture quality seems to be very grainy and muddy, with regards to the show on SKY I'm still of the same opinion. Last night was marginally better than the previous night but it still fell way below the expected standards for this once great channel who only last week were broadcasting full nudity before having to change to ofcom approved rules
its grainy and muddy because there using a very low bitrate to save money on there streaming. if you want better quality stream you have to log on to there site. enter your credit card details and have at least 1 credit on your account. only then will you get an acceptable 1200mbps. which five an acceptable 700p image.
(06-02-2015 21:04 )Markus76 Wrote: [ -> ]And why change the internetprogram? The issue is only the TV Channel or not? Or can ofcom also say to your Website was is right or wrong?
They mean the feed to the internet, not the contents of the website itself.
I know it's way down the list of problems with this channel, but those big silver headphones are just awful.
They remind me of Cybermen
This channels is now doing no different to what it did when it was first on years ago. A group of five or six girls of all shapes and sizes moving around a studio (part of which looks like a building site with scaffolding) doing pathetic dance routines as they take their tops off or not as the case might be.
The picture quality is as poor as it was and the camera switches from girl to girl, angle to angle so often that you lose concentration and often miss the better bits. Just as you think a girl is about to do something interesting, the camera view changes - most frustrating.
Can only hope it gets better, but the format hasn't changed from all those years ago so I doubt it.
Dunno what this show is supposed to be about???
...all I see is a lot of girls, enough to cover the Studio66 nightshow roster for a week, wandering around aimlessly.