as i put in the post i wasn't meaning any offence, my strange sense of humor didnt translate well with that post. I have no issues with anyone's sexuality whatsoever, my point was that as 'more can be seen easily with a pre op/ts, I questioned whether the channel was the appropriate place for it, being a live broadcast softcore tv channel.
I do not wish to upset anyone, apologies if that came across rude, looking back how i worded it i can see why, but rather than try hide my mistake by deleting the post, i would much rather give proper context to it by replying correctly
At the end of the day this is a "sex show" phone-in tv company. If the shows they air are popular and generate calls and revenue they will be deemed successful, and thus will continue in that format. If they crash and burn financially, they will not be repeated.
Time will tell.
Nobody has to watch. If the output isn't to your liking, find another one that is.
Edit: As I uploaded this, I saw your reply, Jorrell. In the avoidance of doubt, I wasn't meaning specifically "you", my use of "your" was global.
I watched the last hour of Joy last night. She played nicely with her pu##y
One of the hot shows in my opinion.
(11-02-2024 10:32 )Joe Long Wrote: [ -> ]I watched the last hour of Joy last night. She played nicely with her pu##y
One of the hot shows in my opinion.
Did you notice she had one of those pink buzz toys inserted for her X-visit fans?
(10-02-2024 23:36 )jorrell Wrote: [ -> ]as i put in the post i wasn't meaning any offence, my strange sense of humor didnt translate well with that post. I have no issues with anyone's sexuality whatsoever, my point was that as 'more can be seen easily with a pre op/ts, I questioned whether the channel was the appropriate place for it, being a live broadcast softcore tv channel.
I do not wish to upset anyone, apologies if that came across rude, looking back how i worded it i can see why, but rather than try hide my mistake by deleting the post, i would much rather give proper context to it by replying correctly
If you scroll back, I voice the same concerns as you did. It doesn´t make a lot of sense for a Babe having a dick in a soft show, because she has to work even more to cover up.
Furthermore, you can clearly see that one can voice these concerns without feeling the need to call her "a dude". I think we are at a point now in our society, where nobody can claim they don't know that misgendering hurts people.
This is not some "strange kind of humor" and you totally knew what you did.
By the way: Joy now cams simultanously and this is one of those toys where you can tip a certain amount and it vibrates. I wrote what I think of camming next to the TV show often enough. I think it's not very enticing when you feel like the side show as the TV audience.
yep, I saw the 'Lovense' device sticking out her juicy lucy!
(12-02-2024 21:14 )jorrell Wrote: [ -> ]yep, I saw the 'Lovense' device sticking out her juicy lucy!
Looks like it's back in again tonight
Well, like I wrote. I know that most people here like it when they are camming simultaneously to the TV show. It forces them to find more revealing positions and sometimes it leads to a good old flash. In essence, it's not a lot different from something like the pervcam.
And I didn't like the pervcam for the same reason: It removes the focus off the TV show. Even more like usual, the show is just about how to find ways to block the best views.