(09-03-2012 10:28 )redlight central Wrote: [ -> ]you call it a "fucking joke" and yet you dont call or want to spend money on the members section ,but you expect us to pay you to watch the streams 
, it costs us money to deliver high quality streams
if you had done your research you would see there is a free high quality interupted stream on playboytvchat
As someone who is a member might i just add...that your HQ stream is very hit and miss...VERY RARELY do all 4 streams together put out anything that can be called high quality in the evenings.
In fairness Stream 1 is usually pretty good, but i would consider it a good night if 2 streams were working well at the same time usually stream 1 and 4 are the best but stream 2 and 3 are, more often than not, poor!
I know i cant be the only one who when learning that their favourite girls are on (Ruby, Savannah, Jennifer Jade in my case) that are just praying that they will be on stream 1!
That being said, during the day the streams are generally quite good, but ive only really learnt that this week as ive been off sick!
I also always notice the streams regularly freezing from around one o'clock in the morning anytime I happen to still be up. It seems to stop doing it at some point in the day, as if I log in early evening it's OK I until one o'clock again.
Does it happen with anyone else? It may be my connection, but I notice no such problems with other channels streams at the same time.
(09-03-2012 10:28 )redlight central Wrote: [ -> ]you call it a "fucking joke" and yet you dont call or want to spend money on the members section ,but you expect us to pay you to watch the streams , it costs us money to deliver high quality streams
if you had done your research you would see there is a free high quality interupted stream on playboytvchat
Indeed, I should have done my research! Thanks to
oklahoma001 a forum member on here I am now aware of the Playboy stream!
I won't bring up to much in this thread on my reasons for not calling RLC recently as it is going off topic, but believe me I have spent more then enough on RLC without having to fork out extra just to see a decent webstream. Thankfully, after being pointed in the right direction I stand corrected on said issue.
I was going to delete my original post but thanks to your excellent PR skills decided against it.
Thanks to forum members for being helpful and insightful.
Can I just ask....since their is now playboytv where you can view high quality webstreams for free....what exactly are members paying £9.95 a month for at this moment in time?
(09-03-2012 19:29 )K.HarperSe7en Wrote: [ -> ]Can I just ask....since their is now playboytv where you can view high quality webstreams for free....what exactly are members paying £9.95 a month for at this moment in time?
I think its interrupted, much like the elite stream!
thanks gaz that is correct
(09-03-2012 19:39 )Gaz "AV1" Aston Wrote: [ -> ]I think its interrupted, much like the elite stream!
Oh yeh of course. I was wondering why it kept re-loading the other night!
By the way, thats a much better idea than a poor quality webstream. Fair play to RLC for getting that sorted.
The stream on playboy is a million times better, no complaints there. Although it does raise the question... Why have the RLC stream so poor, or even why have the RLC site at all ? It seems to me its an inferior and now slightly redundant site compared to the playboy one. Is it not possible to pipe the HQ stream through both or is that an extra expense ?
(10-03-2012 11:02 )Money_Shot Wrote: [ -> ]The stream on playboy is a million times better, no complaints there. Although it does raise the question... Why have the RLC stream so poor, or even why have the RLC site at all ? It seems to me its an inferior and now slightly redundant site compared to the playboy one. Is it not possible to pipe the HQ stream through both or is that an extra expense ?
would you rather see a low quality stream with no timeout or a high quaity stream with timeout? i don't mind a short timeout (it's just so you can see what's on - so high quality is good) provided that members and callers have the timeout removed (or a long timeout)
(11-03-2012 15:25 )speedy Wrote: [ -> ]would you rather see a low quality stream with no timeout or a high quaity stream with timeout? i don't mind a short timeout (it's just so you can see what's on - so high quality is good) provided that members and callers have the timeout removed (or a long timeout)
I'd rather see a HQ stream, hence why I can't work out why RLC has one and playboy has one, yet the RLC one is inferior compared to the Playboy one.
I think it's more then justified to have a time out on streams for non paying customers. Elite do the same but at least RLC has a decent amount of time between time outs.