(15-04-2010 18:57 )Vic_Smith Wrote: [ -> ]Is it possible to broadcast live shows on this channel?
I think it's been said somewhere already that yes it's a possibility.
(15-04-2010 18:58 )daniel2010 Wrote: [ -> ]Can we not get some sort of upcoming schedule on the website. So it would say what girls are on the show what time and the name of the programme that way people might be more interested in buying the show that night if there is something on they want to see and they know about it.
this is something we have flagged up ourselves as soon as the channel went live yesterday, and we will be working to get this going
(15-04-2010 18:58 )daniel2010 Wrote: [ -> ]Can we not get some sort of upcoming schedule on the website. So it would say what girls are on the show what time and the name of the programme that way people might be more interested in buying the show that night if there is something on they want to see and they know about it.
very true, this would help
(15-04-2010 18:57 )Vic_Smith Wrote: [ -> ]Is it possible to broadcast live shows on this channel? Just as they do now with the girls moving from channel to channel during the night, those willing to go that bit further could do a more explicit stint on Extreme, preferably with some viewer interaction. It'd be cooler to have that live interaction rather than just fill the channel with pre-recorded shows I think.
the channel is only new, there is a vast world of opportunities we can do with it. We have a brand new channel, with a brand new setup, and obviously had to "ease" into it to ensure that it all worked and wasn't just a big waste of production and engineering time if it wasn't going to be accessible to our viewer base
it's definitely being looked at
[/quote]
very true, this would help
[/quote]
so whats on tonight?
(15-04-2010 19:07 )misterG Wrote: [ -> ]so whats on tonight?
don't have that information available due to the way it is scheduled at the moment, sorry
Firstly, thanks for letting us watch the first broadcast free, it does show you're not one of those cynical companies that refuses to send it's products out for review before they launch.
Now i'm sure i'll only be repeating what has already been said on the previous 20+ pages but anyway, I only caught about 2hrs in all but I can't honestly say I would pay for any of the content I saw. Why? Dull Dull Dull. People like BabeStation (I imagine) because of it's nature, we like the girls, but more importantly we KNOW the girls from the interaction and their time on mic by themselves or bantering with each other. They are not random nobodys we know nothing about getting screwed in slow-motion in poorly lit lifts or badly decorated living rooms - why bother to show hardcore when you can't 'show' hardcore(?)
I didn't expect to see any penetration and quite frankly didn't particularly want to, you can't compete with the vast, free, openness of the hallowed world of internet porn. You are BabeStation, give us a version of BabeStation that we can't get elsewhere.
Finally, just out of interest is it markedly more expensive for you to broadcast encrypted?
I can't comment on the whole show, because I only watched the first hour (before my BS2 recording started), but one thing that really stood out was the lack of dialogue, humour, or any sense of fun.
A while back, on one of the phone channels, Stevie changed positions and accidentally showed a little too much (nothing very serious), so they gave her the mike, and she told us that she'd forgotten she was naked! That is funny! Of course it didn't have to be Stevie, it would have been funny whoever had done it.
But some sweaty, hairy, naked bloke grunting away and getting his end away with some bird no-one's ever heard of? What's funny about that? Oh, I know some guys get turned on imagining the geezer is themselves, but where's the fun?
As said, it could be funny, if it was just the girls we know, being just a little more daring and revealing than they are on the other channels - how many people have already said this?
(15-04-2010 19:36 )lucent-x Wrote: [ -> ]Firstly, thanks for letting us watch the first broadcast free, it does show you're not one of those cynical companies that refuses to send it's products out for review before they launch.
Now i'm sure i'll only be repeating what has already been said on the previous 20+ pages but anyway, I only caught about 2hrs in all but I can't honestly say I would pay for any of the content I saw. Why? Dull Dull Dull. People like BabeStation (I imagine) because of it's nature, we like the girls, but more importantly we KNOW the girls from the interaction and their time on mic by themselves or bantering with each other. They are not random nobodys we know nothing about getting screwed in slow-motion in poorly lit lifts or badly decorated living rooms - why bother to show hardcore when you can't 'show' hardcore(?)
I didn't expect to see any penetration and quite frankly didn't particularly want to, you can't compete with the vast, free, openness of the hallowed world of internet porn. You are BabeStation, give us a version of BabeStation that we can't get elsewhere.
Finally, just out of interest is it markedly more expensive for you to broadcast encrypted?
Thanks for your post. The service is still in it's infancy, as we go forward I would expect more presence from Babestation girls (hopefully). I think once they've seen the show, and perhaps are reassured that no one expects them to be doing porn, we may well see more of them getting involved. At the moment we've just gone with it with what we have, we have to start somewhere, so we've started here and we're hoping it develops into something that (at least most of you) can enjoy in some way.
With regards to costs, our lowly web team voice has no involvement in any of that so I don't know unfortunately
(15-04-2010 19:39 )PersonaNonGrata Wrote: [ -> ]I can't comment on the whole show, because I only watched the first hour (before my BS2 recording started), but one thing that really stood out was the lack of dialogue, humour, or any sense of fun.
A while back, on one of the phone channels, Stevie changed positions and accidentally showed a little too much (nothing very serious), so they gave her the mike, and she told us that she'd forgotten she was naked! That is funny! Of course it didn't have to be Stevie, it would have been funny whoever had done it.
But some sweaty, hairy, naked bloke grunting away and getting his end away with some bird no-one's ever heard of? What's funny about that? Oh, I know some guys get turned on imagining the geezer is themselves, but where's the fun?
As said, it could be funny, if it was just the girls we know, being just a little more daring and revealing than they are on the other channels - how many people have already said this?
Thanks for your suggestion, it's something we would agree with. The more the show evolves, the more we'll be able to get the girls' personalities shine through and hopefully get a bit of banter going etc...