The UK Babe Channels Forum

(15-04-2010 17:44 )misterG Wrote: [ -> ]NB what odds do I get for the show not to last a month?

Who knows? If they listen to the reviews from the members of this distinguished forum the channel could end up being very good.

(15-04-2010 17:34 )babestation Wrote: [ -> ]every comment on HERE was negative, not every comment was negative.. please remember this forum only represents a very small minority of the channel's viewer base

I wasn't aware I was speaking about anywhere else but here. I didn't feel it necessary to point out that which I thought was quite obvious.

Considering the diversity of the members here and the varied demographics we represent, I imagine our comments will be fairly typical of the comments you will receive from anywhere else.

Quote:every comment on HERE was negative, not every comment was negative.. please remember this forum only represents a very small minority of the channel's viewer base

so thats how your justifying it.... you don't like the feedback you got so your dismissing it...

you wonder why cellcast has such a low reputation on this and other forums. yeah the girls are liked and 1 or 2 of yer staff but on the whole we think the guys in charge are dicks with no interest in what the customer actually wants....

with that reply you have shown your true colours.... "they will get what there given and be happy with it...."

well heres my reply as bluntly and succinctly as i can put it, yer program? was a fucking joke ...

you promised babestation girls in g/g action going further than ever. well you failed we got lolly and karina doing a bit of censored hardcore... sorry ive seen both doing harder elsewhere for free

every other babestation girls appearance was a joke and misleading.
ella went no further than she does on bs1
camilla showed less than she does on PL.
dani o'neil gave us an advert for her site?.
oh yeah hanna shaw? REALY! a babestation babe?...
and that was it b4 i gave up.
infact the only section i enjoyed was yvette and she doesn't work for you any more.

in essence you did not deliver any content that we as viewers were hoping for.
what you did was tantamount to false advertising as no girl mentioned went further than ever,and i for 1 am over the moon you gave us it for free so we would know exactly what to expect in future, and that is? FUCK ALL!
so what will babestation xtreme get from me in future? FUCK ALL...

(15-04-2010 18:06 )whizzer Wrote: [ -> ]

(15-04-2010 17:44 )misterG Wrote: [ -> ]NB what odds do I get for the show not to last a month?

Who knows? If they listen to the reviews from the members of this distinguished forum the channel could end up being very good.

I agree, but I don't think they have a good track record of listening and regardless of what BS says here, I don't think thats changed - after all they didn't ask for views on the channel before it was launched so what makes you think they'll change it now because of whats said here - PR BullShit is the same the world over.

(15-04-2010 18:08 )Hexit Wrote: [ -> ] so thats how your justifying it.... you don't like the feedback you got so your dismissing it...

you wonder why cellcast has such a low reputation on this and other forums. yeah the girls are liked and 1 or 2 of yer staff but on the whole we think the guys in charge are dicks with no interest in what the customer actually wants....

with that reply you have shown your true colours.... "they will get what there given and be happy with it...."

well heres my reply as bluntly and succinctly as i can put it, yer program? was a fucking joke ...

you promised babestation girls in g/g action going further than ever. well you failed we got lolly and karina doing a bit of censored hardcore... sorry ive seen both doing harder elsewhere for free

every other babestation girls appearance was a joke and misleading.
ella went no further than she does on bs1
camilla showed less than she does on PL.
dani o'neil gave us an advert for her site?.
oh yeah hanna shaw? REALY! a babestation babe?...
and that was it b4 i gave up.
infact the only section i enjoyed was yvette and she doesn't work for you any more.

in essence you did not deliver any content that we as viewers were hoping for.
what you did was tantamount to false advertising as no girl mentioned went further than ever,and i for 1 am over the moon you gave us it for free so we would know exactly what to expect in future, and that is? FUCK ALL!
so what will babestation xtreme get from me in future? FUCK ALL...

where have I said we dismiss your comments? I think at every opportunity we have said we want feedback, and I even said in my last post that we have acted on the feedback you have given us.

at the end of the day, there's nothing we can say which will go down well in here.. I can only try and help those who genuinely need it, and we can only listen to constructive feedback, which we have and will continue to do so.

(15-04-2010 17:34 )babestation Wrote: [ -> ]...we have a recruitment team hard at work and our content team is busy making fresh content for the channel, including as many of the Babestation girls as humanly possible...

Well, that's good to hear. IMO, the softcore boy/girl clips and movies should be ditched entirely. There's gigabytes of this stuff available of every conceivable niche online in unbutchered form. Why would anyone want to pay a fiver a night to watch the OFCOM friendly versions?

No, what I want to see is basically filthier, pants off versions of the 2 4 1's and solo spots we see on the regular channels, preferably with some viewer interaction with the girls. Also, I prefer stuff like this to be shot on videotape, gives it more of an immediacy and rawness. I hate the way some of those spots were shot last night; hold the camera at a 45 degree angle, throw in some mood lighting and slow motion. Just looks too much like the soft focus, chocolate boxy American shite you'd see on something like Playboy.

Anyway, if ever the channel reaches a point where at least 90% of it's output is filthier girl on girl and solo spots with BS girls I recognise I'd pay to watch. Not until then though. Best of luck with it all though.

(15-04-2010 18:09 )misterG Wrote: [ -> ]what makes you think they'll change it now because of whats said here

Because they want people to pay for the channel.

[/quote]

I think at every opportunity we have said we want feedback, and I even said in my last post that we have acted on the feedback you have given us.
[/quote]

yeah you said it but its just BullShit

Wish I could make some comments about the show, but as you might have seen in the "tech problems" thread, I just got a black screen last night.

CONGRATULATIONS ON A SUCCESSFUL LAUNCH NIGHT OF AWESOMELY EPIC PROPORTIONS!

I personally didn't see it - but judging by the amount of comments on here it surely was a resounding success and all bodes well for the future

No need to change anything as it has well and truly been met with joy and optimism

Carry on as you were

*todays post was brought to you by the numbers 1 and 2, the letters B and S and the theme 'Sarcasm'