Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

(05-06-2015 20:32 )Censorship :-( Wrote:  

(05-06-2015 17:21 )Joey 27 Wrote:  

(05-06-2015 14:51 )Censorship :-( Wrote:  [quote='Scottishbloke' pid='1698617' dateline='1433468520']

Well, I didn't say that they should be covered up at all times, and putting aside the argument that a fashion show might actually be more entertaining than much of the current babe shows , as I said, each to their own.

You seem to be someone for whom nudity is the 'be all and end all', and that's something I don't get, for the reasons I've outlined - you don't get to see anything, and it restricts performance; that, to me, seems pointless, self-defeating, and boring.
As ShandyHand points out, for some, if nudity appears, then it's a great show, if not, rubbish - no grey areas, just black and white; only one thing of interest and nothing else will do.

However, ultimately, all of this is subjective, but the fundamental point I was making still stands, that it is ridiculous to blame today’s crap shows on a lack of nudity (unless you are of the NAAT and nothing else will do, persuasion). Not to mention, that there isn't a complete lack of nudity, anyway!

Finally, unlike some, I'd be happy to see a variety of content, so that many people could be happy, at least some of the time; The real problem is that there is 'next to fuck all content', almost all of the time, so many people are unhappy, most of the time!

We do agree on one thing, though - tights! yeuch!

Nudity isn't the be all and end all for me because if i was looking to see pussy i'd go and watch BS unleashed or porn all the time, i agree naked can be boring if the babe is just laying on her front for ages but they aren't that restricted in movement

Levi is considered to be very boring but if she actually got naked for once or wore just a thong i'd probably watch her as she has a nice curvy body, but i can't admire her body when she covers it up with corsets and stockings all the time, tonight Olivia is yet again wearing another outfit she can move around as much as she likes but its meaningless to me because not enough skin is on show,

ideally i'd like to see a babe wearing just a thong or knickers because they can still move about freely, if they wore an outfit and did a striptease then that's fine but they don't tend to strip off, they wear the outfit until they go off on a break and then change into another outfit, the majority of my favourite shows have been when a babe has been naked or wearing just a thong, not when they wore a nurse's outfit or a college outfit even though the performance may have been better

(05-06-2015 22:03 )ShandyHand Wrote:  Cynical answer: Bigger money!

More thoughtful answer: Less pressure from being just one among many, many? (Although there is increased competition amongst the babes I'd suppose; as long as they do OK there's not as much riding on what they do individually as at a smaller operation.) I think the chopping and changing suits some girls more than it does their audience! It's less of a struggle for them to avoid being too repetitive.

I would attach a cynical slant even on your thoughful answer .
Settling for doing as little horny and sexually stimulating stuff as possible while knowing that almost all your colleagues will do the same in a culture of OFCOM fear, ridiculous over self regulation and anti freeloader sentiment.
At the same time knowing that you won't be singled out as a culprit because it is happening across the board with every stint looking pretty much the same no matter how short and no matter in what set.
Same old outfits, same old sets, same old moves with the excuse to be deemed no worse or better than anyone else.
Safety in numbers of mediocrity and tedium.
Oh dear oh dear. What a miserable state of affairs .

Lori is doing a freeview special now, I don't think there has been one at this time before, 1-2am. Cali on sky.
They could be experimenting with the timing now, phase two of the data gathering.

^ I thought it was just because Lori's BSX shows have mucked up the usual timing ? Maybe you're right though.

Lori did two BSX shows in a row - both the 11:30pm and 00:30am one, which seems unusual when there was supposedly two babes doing BSX solo shows originally on the schedule - no Candy Sexton by the look of it, unless she did a web only one at 10pm. (I gave up watching the logo waiting for something to happen).
And from the OSG's it looks like Lori's going to go straight from this Freeview climax line show onto the 02:30am BSX show as well.

EDIT : yep and there she goes at barely 2:15am - needs time to get ready.

Just checked Candy's twitter and she never made it to the studio, so it is all Lori tonight for the bsx shows.

^ Not quite - they had Ella Hughes for one stint at 01:30am - I think Lori was actually on BS1 at the time, so 3 out of 4.

The signing of Keira Knight is a positive for BS imo.
If BS can maximise her potential she could be a real saviour.
Best body on BS and possibly any channel right now.
A figure to die for.
I would like to see the massage table, sauna and shower sets brought back into play.
They provided some electrifying entertainment in shows gone by and I don't understand why those sets have been withdrawn from use on the regular BS channels.

(06-06-2015 01:56 )circles_o_o_o Wrote:  Lori is doing a freeview special now, I don't think there has been one at this time before, 1-2am. Cali on sky.
They could be experimenting with the timing now, phase two of the data gathering.

Quite frankly,i was hoping for an end to the splitting/data collection policy,it does raise the question about how much data is really needed,surely they have enough after the last three months worth of tame lifeless shows on Sky,perhaps its time to reverse the experiment and tame down Freeview,particularly as Freeviewers could still watch online,a luxury which has not been made available to Sky viewers,who continue to be treated with upmost contempt by a company who no longer provides an equal service,continuing to withhold their stronger content from an audience who,like me have been there from the start,in summary,enough data has been collected,its time to either return to equal strength shows or if they dont need income from Sky customers pull out altogether.

(05-06-2015 19:15 )ShandyHand Wrote:  The imagination only takes hold when the knickers hit the floor for some viewers it seems. They are excited by the mere fact that the pussy has only air around it and it is somehow more accessible to them - if only camera's could see around corners that is! It's a strange mental agility that I can not accomplish it seems.

Made me chuckle heartily .
Brilliant way with words .

(06-06-2015 02:11 )M-L-L Wrote:  ^ I thought it was just because Lori's BSX shows have mucked up the usual timing ? Maybe you're right though.

Lori did two BSX shows in a row - both the 11:30pm and 00:30am one, which seems unusual when there was supposedly two babes doing BSX solo shows originally on the schedule - no Candy Sexton by the look of it, unless she did a web only one at 10pm. (I gave up watching the logo waiting for something to happen).
And from the OSG's it looks like Lori's going to go straight from this Freeview climax line show onto the 02:30am BSX show as well.

EDIT : yep and there she goes at barely 2:15am - needs time to get ready.

Time to get ready??? How long exactly does it take to put on a thong which 2 minutes later turns into a thong of the hand kind