Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

(05-06-2015 17:21 )Joey 27 Wrote:  

(05-06-2015 14:51 )Censorship :-( Wrote:  

(05-06-2015 02:42 )Scottishbloke Wrote:  

I for one, don't - the problems of today’s shows has nothing to do with a lack of nudity (and, for the record, Lori did go naked last night, anyway); the problem, IMO, is the lack of performance, something that nudity is likely to curtail yet further. Remember, these days, babe channel 'nudity' is almost always the 'non-explicit, legs closed, don't move' variety, not the 'legs spread, hand panty, free to move/perform as much as you like' kind, that we used to get.

OK, there are those for whom nudity is the 'be all and end all'; I'm not one of them. - Seriously, I just don't get the obsession? Whoop-de-fucking-do, a babe's naked, and as a result, barley moving, let alone doing anything overtly sexual! But hey, she's naked - Yay! Really??? Is that all it takes?
Last time I checked, there's nudity on nudist beaches, for example, but that's 'not supposed' to be sexual - these TV channels (emphasis on 'TV channels', as in 'moving images', not photographs) are sexual (at least, they're supposed to be ).
BTW, no offence intended - each to their own, but please don't try to blame how crap the shows have become on a 'lack of nudity'.

---

^ Of course, unlike Lori, most babes do wear sexy outfits, but still don't perform.

Well its not a fashion show so i'd prefer to see a babe just wear a thong or be naked most of the time, i have no desire to see my fave babes wearing a secretary outfit, nurse's outfit, dom outfit or wearing bras and stockings all night, infact i can't stand tights and stockings at all, if the babe is wearing an outfit i don't like the babes performance then becomes irrelevant to me if i can't see enough flesh

Occasionally i'd like to see a babe wearing an outfit like a vest top of maybe some casual street clothes but the stereotypical clichéd outfits we often see on the babeshows bores me, i used to watch Olivia Berzinc in the past but now she always seems to be wearing outfits, last night i enjoyed watching Leigh Darby when she was naked but i don't watch her when she is wearing a corset and tights, tbh i don't even watch Tori Lee that much when she is wearing a bra and stockings

Well, I didn't say that they should be covered up at all times, and putting aside the argument that a fashion show might actually be more entertaining than much of the current babe shows , as I said, each to their own.

You seem to be someone for whom nudity is the 'be all and end all', and that's something I don't get, for the reasons I've outlined - you don't get to see anything, and it restricts performance; that, to me, seems pointless, self-defeating, and boring.
As ShandyHand points out, for some, if nudity appears, then it's a great show, if not, rubbish - no grey areas, just black and white; only one thing of interest and nothing else will do.

However, ultimately, all of this is subjective, but the fundamental point I was making still stands, that it is ridiculous to blame today’s crap shows on a lack of nudity (unless you are of the NAAT and nothing else will do, persuasion). Not to mention, that there isn't a complete lack of nudity, anyway!

Finally, unlike some, I'd be happy to see a variety of content, so that many people could be happy, at least some of the time; The real problem is that there is 'next to fuck all content', almost all of the time, so many people are unhappy, most of the time!

We do agree on one thing, though - tights! yeuch!

what does babestation offer the girls that the other channels don't a lot of girls seem to be defecting to babestation and seem to be happy enough there, but for a viewer its bloody woefull girls not getting much airtime, chopping and changing channels through the night and as for the call stacking and listen in lines and the "after the clock reaches 0" crap and all the mic chat premoting the "best ever naughtiest ever" video clips garbage

(05-06-2015 20:32 )Censorship :-( Wrote:  We do agree on one thing, though - tights! yeuch!

...awh....not even those tights with the patterns on them to make them look like stocking tops with suspender belts ?

Tights don't enrage me, but then neither do I understand a fetishistic appreciation of them.

They're a bit difficult for a babe to elegantly disrobe out of imo so can look at bit awkward, but other than that they don't incite strong feelings from me either way.

Why doesn't the spellchecker like "fetishistic" ?

(05-06-2015 20:56 )Rob169 Wrote:  what does babestation offer the girls that the other channels don't

Good question :
is it a potentially wider exposure to and recognition from a bigger audience with the Freeview channels as well as the satellite channels, compared to the exclusively web only/exclusively satellite ones/ones without webstreams ?

Bs cover all the bases, they are not only on all broadcast platforms but they do all levels of shows. From bs daytime to bs unleashed they have something for whatever level the girls want to work at.

(05-06-2015 21:05 )M-L-L Wrote:  

(05-06-2015 20:56 )Rob169 Wrote:  what does babestation offer the girls that the other channels don't

Good question :
is it a potentially wider exposure to and recognition from a bigger audience with the Freeview channels as well as the satellite channels, compared to the exclusively web only/exclusively satellite ones/ones without webstreams ?

Cynical answer: Bigger money!

More thoughtful answer: Less pressure from being just one among many, many? (Although there is increased competition amongst the babes I'd suppose; as long as they do OK there's not as much riding on what they do individually as at a smaller operation.) I think the chopping and changing suits some girls more than it does their audience! It's less of a struggle for them to avoid being too repetitive.

They should all dress up as nuns, they might get outta that annoying habit then

(05-06-2015 22:04 )davetherave57 Wrote:  They should all dress up as nuns

(05-06-2015 21:00 )M-L-L Wrote:  

(05-06-2015 20:32 )Censorship :-( Wrote:  SNIP

SNIP

Why doesn't the spellchecker like "fetishistic" ?

Presumably, it's 'Ofcon' approved!

(05-06-2015 21:42 )Tractor boy Wrote:  Bs cover all the bases, they are not only on all broadcast platforms but they do all levels of shows. From bs daytime to bs unleashed they have something for whatever level the girls want to work at.

the other channels don't have anything like unleashed web shows. I don't think sintv's xstreams can Beat. As girls get to show every thing