Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion

(08-08-2015 16:03 )DB83 Wrote:  ^^ Nah. Did not miss it. Just reworded it.

The channels recover any 'costs'. If they have made videos, pictures etc. they do not simply stop selling them if someone jumps. s66 being a case in point.

other channels do it as well as s66, selling photos etc for babes that are no longer at that channel

^it's ok mate, he wasn't slagging off s66, you can climb down off the horse and put the sword and shield away for now. you'll most probably get the chance to give them a genuine run out later!

(08-08-2015 11:43 )bigglesworth Wrote:  I think at least some of them held the view that they weren't taking a risk (because Sin TV were so full of talk about their plans for the future).

Some of the girls who joined Sin TV thought they had been made an offer that they simply couldn't refuse.

Quote:other channels do it as well as s66, selling photos etc for babes that are no longer at that channel

Once they have signed a modelling contract with a channel for photos or videos then the channel can continue to sell them forever and a day assuming they hold the copyright and not the photographer which would appear to be the case.

(09-08-2015 10:25 )admiral decker Wrote:  

(08-08-2015 11:43 )bigglesworth Wrote:  I think at least some of them held the view that they weren't taking a risk (because Sin TV were so full of talk about their plans for the future).

Some of the girls who joined Sin TV thought they had been made an offer that they simply couldn't refuse.

And, looking at the companies that Mr. {however-you-pronounce-that-name} runs, his expertise is in recruitment. With that there are two types. And I guess that the he has some skill in the 'head-hunting' variant which is quite a 'hard sell'

Oh. And one of those companies, thanks to earlier info, is in liquidation. So it seems that he is a bit of an Arthur Daley character.

(09-08-2015 10:25 )admiral decker Wrote:  

(08-08-2015 11:43 )bigglesworth Wrote:  I think at least some of them held the view that they weren't taking a risk (because Sin TV were so full of talk about their plans for the future).

Some of the girls who joined Sin TV thought they had been made an offer that they simply couldn't refuse.

If it looks too good to be true, it usually isn't true

(09-08-2015 09:50 )terence Wrote:  ^it's ok mate, he wasn't slagging off s66, you can climb down off the horse and put the sword and shield away for now. you'll most probably get the chance to give them a genuine run out later!

know that, just saying other channels as well as s66 sell pics of babes that are not at the channel any more

I assume that the babes would have signed a model release form at each shoot but surely the photographer would have also signed over rights too?

they would but if they then didnt get paid then any contracts the girls signed would be broken.
the copyright then returns to the girls/girls management company.
its likely the reason the site went off air befor the sky channels did as the site would be infringing copyright by using the girls images to promote sintv.

why is this crap still being discussed? isnt this channel dead?