Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 12 Vote(s) - 3.5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion

Author Message
broncobilly10 Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 4,662
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 39
Post: #2891
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion
(25-06-2015 09:45 )KerrAvon Wrote:  I personally think Ella-Mai is one of the best babes on the channels, great natural bod, sensual & erotic personality who'll engage you & will accommodate on screen as much as possible.

If a babe like her is always surplus compared to babes who are usually lazy & run of the mill, then maybe the real fault of the channels are actually the type of punters who ring in. If they're hooked on certain babes no matter what they do, then even good fresh babes won't stand a chance.

As for Sin TV themselves, they've still got the infrastructure to challenge the likes of S66 if they can't quite take on the BS or XPanded juggernauts. Just needs some balls in management to sort out what they want to do. Looks a bit directionless at the moment.

The lack of infrastructure for me is the biggest problem, they signed great girls but never got sorted with a game plan or proper people running it or working the tech. This channel is doomed and it's got little to do with the girls who are there or who left

For example Ella Mai is as natural as you could get and fun. The same applies to a lot of the girls on Sin.
25-06-2015 10:47
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ILoveBrunettes Offline
Crazy Fool
***

Posts: 215
Joined: Nov 2013
Reputation: 17
Post: #2892
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion
The signs don't look good for SinTV - lets face it. They want top talent, they sign girls willy-nilly to try and get top talent, they get the talent from the other channels, this is all good, but the rumours flying around about SinTV are sending out bad signals, and bad signs of things to come. Why was Ree Petra suddenly dropped from the schedule earlier this week? Everyone i know that likes Ree was really looking forward to her being on, and was quite surprised when she said on Twitter she woudln't be on. Did she cancel, was she dropped? We will never know, it's not our business to know, but considering Ree is one of their top girls in my opinion, something is wrong, seriously wrong at SinTV. They have an awful set up on their website - just two streams, one live TV, the other the web stream. Web stream is hardly ever on, when it is, it gets cut off just as fast and we have to wait ages for it to come back on. They cut the live TV feed as well for lenghty ads/vids. It's awful to see. Lets not forget, this is a channel which i think/thought, has/had so much potential to take on the so called big guns that are quite frankly, at the moment poor (babestation being the main one), so it's disappointing to see SinTV drop away like this. Seeing people posting about girls leaving, well, we don't know if that is true, but lack of appearances would point to this feeling true. It's very hard to say what's going on. I hope this is just a blip in the production, but if i'm wrong, this channel that has potential if managed correctly, will go out of business, and that woudl be a real shame because all we would be left with is tamestation, and the thought of that scares the living crap out of me because their production values are so poor. SinTV need a kick up the arse, or someone to go in and sort out the mess if the rumours i've heard are true (which are just rumours and the reason i have not mentioned them on here - or in private)

Sorry for the long post, but i'm seeing horrible signs of channels long gone now happening with SinTV right before my eyes, and its a sad thing to see happening
25-06-2015 14:22
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Rammyrascal Offline
Team Thicc
*****

Posts: 99,875
Joined: Apr 2009
Reputation: 249
Post: #2893
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion
(25-06-2015 10:47 )Broncobilly Wrote:  
(25-06-2015 09:45 )KerrAvon Wrote:  I personally think Ella-Mai is one of the best babes on the channels, great natural bod, sensual & erotic personality who'll engage you & will accommodate on screen as much as possible.

If a babe like her is always surplus compared to babes who are usually lazy & run of the mill, then maybe the real fault of the channels are actually the type of punters who ring in. If they're hooked on certain babes no matter what they do, then even good fresh babes won't stand a chance.

As for Sin TV themselves, they've still got the infrastructure to challenge the likes of S66 if they can't quite take on the BS or XPanded juggernauts. Just needs some balls in management to sort out what they want to do. Looks a bit directionless at the moment.

The lack of infrastructure for me is the biggest problem, they signed great girls but never got sorted with a game plan or proper people running it or working the tech. This channel is doomed and it's got little to do with the girls who are there or who left

For example Ella Mai is as natural as you could get and fun. The same applies to a lot of the girls on Sin.

bex shiner id say is as natural as you can get and fun. think the x-stream will be on tonight as at the moment 4 babes are on the schedule (Louise Porter, Paige Turnah, Ella Jolie & Lilly Roma) if this stays correct then cant see sin putting all 4 babes on sky at the same time so think it will be 3 babes on sky & 1 on x-stream

Piper Niven Superfan
25-06-2015 14:59
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bigfatpiggyporker Offline
Goodbye
*****

Posts: 1,425
Joined: Apr 2014
Reputation: 61
Post: #2894
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion
After a great start and with some great initial talent and then great signings, it's certainly not the prize racehorse it once appeared to be now.
(This post was last modified: 25-06-2015 19:03 by bigfatpiggyporker.)
25-06-2015 19:03
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
broncobilly10 Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 4,662
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 39
Post: #2895
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion
Not so long ago we were speculating how many channels Sin would need
25-06-2015 19:08
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
moron50 Away
Master Poster
****

Posts: 868
Joined: Sep 2008
Reputation: 71
Post: #2896
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion
The pre-launch was infinitely superior to anything they've achieved since, which is fucking ridiculous. Pretty much sums the whole thing up in a sentence.
25-06-2015 19:24
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ShandyHand Offline
No Paywall Onlys - not babeshows
*****

Posts: 3,972
Joined: Mar 2009
Reputation: 65
Post: #2897
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion
(25-06-2015 19:03 )bigfatpiggyporker Wrote:  After a great start and with some great initial talent and then great signings, it's certainly not the prize racehorse it once appeared to be now.

You can have all the visible onscreen talent in the world and if you don't know how to work with it you're still screwed.

Sin at times have looked like Barcelona managed by the bloke that runs our local five-a-side! Now they are having to field the reserves because the prime talent has got the jitters.

They also don't seem to be learning too quickly; too busy 'fighting fires' every day would be my guess. They were fine when they had all the prep time in the world before launch. Once 'live' a whole different level of skill set is obviously required. Their planning staff look to be mostly lacking even now.

It's a damn shame that they haven't made a better fist of it.

The idea that the babeshows "are not that deep" is driven by those that don't wish to acknowledge how much effective customer service and a consideration of psychology impacts users' future interactions.
(This post was last modified: 25-06-2015 19:28 by ShandyHand.)
25-06-2015 19:25
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bigfatpiggyporker Offline
Goodbye
*****

Posts: 1,425
Joined: Apr 2014
Reputation: 61
Post: #2898
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion
(25-06-2015 19:25 )ShandyHand Wrote:  You can have all the visible onscreen talent in the world and if you don't know how to work with it you're still screwed.

It's a damn shame that they haven't made a better fist of it.

Yep, agree with you there ShandyHand, it's management, not the girls, at fault.
25-06-2015 19:29
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ShandyHand Offline
No Paywall Onlys - not babeshows
*****

Posts: 3,972
Joined: Mar 2009
Reputation: 65
Post: #2899
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion
(25-06-2015 19:29 )bigfatpiggyporker Wrote:  
(25-06-2015 19:25 )ShandyHand Wrote:  You can have all the visible onscreen talent in the world and if you don't know how to work with it you're still screwed.

It's a damn shame that they haven't made a better fist of it.

Yep, agree with you there ShandyHand, it's management, not the girls, at fault.

Yep. Glad you said "management" as well and not "production" or "back-room staff" as some have blamed on here. The distinction is important I think. Most of Sin's product has looked pretty good IMO. It is the decision making that has been slow and suspect.

The idea that the babeshows "are not that deep" is driven by those that don't wish to acknowledge how much effective customer service and a consideration of psychology impacts users' future interactions.
25-06-2015 19:39
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bigfatpiggyporker Offline
Goodbye
*****

Posts: 1,425
Joined: Apr 2014
Reputation: 61
Post: #2900
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion
yeah good production values, great talent, bad seemingly inept management.
25-06-2015 19:44
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply