Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion

Can we have a documentary about the art of phone waving? .

What incentive is there to be creative though? There is no prestige to be had by competing against the other channels for a BAFTA or any equivalent prize, so that they can proudly claim to be the most award-winning station. They don't need to attract sponsors or advertisers so no need to flaunt any credentials of quality or popularity. If the money is coming in that is it.

Some girls can still choose to take some pride in being as good as they can in the circumstances, but it's not really going to help them on their CV later on, just a personal satisfaction that they clearly don't all feel the need for.
And I hardly think the channel bosses are going to be offended at being accused of running a business for the money.

I rarely post in the "Great night" or the "Rubbish night" threads because I don't agree they deserve either distinction most nights, they're just there, and it's a case of finding the bright spots amongst the humdrum, like bargain-hunting at a jumble sale. If you can find a gem, that's good, but part of the fun is in the searching for it too.

(05-06-2015 01:35 )snookered147 Wrote:  Can we have a documentary about the art of phone waving? .

^ BBC 4 are already looking into it for their follow up to the recent "Slow Season"...it'll probably be scheduled either before or after the programme about paint mixing and drying.

(05-06-2015 01:31 )Scottishbloke Wrote:  Well all I'll say is that I'm currently watching a documentary on how bread is made on BBC2 which is a damn lot more interesting and stimulating than what's on the 900's tonight

That is also about making dough SB!

The same girls always try to perform and the same lazy girls don't

(05-06-2015 14:04 )RESPONSIBLE ADULT Wrote:  

(05-06-2015 01:31 )Scottishbloke Wrote:  Well all I'll say is that I'm currently watching a documentary on how bread is made on BBC2 which is a damn lot more interesting and stimulating than what's on the 900's tonight

That is also about making dough SB!

Very droll

(05-06-2015 00:34 )snookered147 Wrote:  Yes the emphasis on providing visual stimulation for the purpose of sexual telephonic interaction has, it seems been overtaken by a reliance on the fanboy type who are happy to ring in come what may.
It is a minimalist approach where doing as little as possible to make ends meet has been deemed enough.
No bother about the viewer who will call only by a convincingly sexual visual stimulus. Now it is enough to just plonk an attractive lady on to a desk, bed or some other flat surface safe in the knowledge that no matter how static, how predictable, how mind numbing or how gormless that all will be ok because some people will still see that as enough.
No care about investing in quality and variety of set.
No care about creating the hottest, horniest themes and scenarios and playing them out to the most erotic, most filthy and most sexually enticing of grand conclusion.
No care about the sexiest outfits being peeled off completely in the most hypnotic and sexually charged manner.

No no.
Sit or lie on this or that for hour upon hour, night after night.
Exhaust every technique of phone waving imaginable.
Exhaust every excuse valid or not and no matter how ludicrous or inconsistent as to why certain requests cannot be granted.
Shift every goalpost every second of every minute and then claim that OFCOM is the cause. Who knew that OFCOM guidance could evolve so rapidly and so constantly in a fashion so hyperactive it makes comedian Lee Evans look like a mere stage tortoise?
Exhaust the patience of everyone and anyone who cares with an anti freeloader sentiment that is of help and comfort to nobody.

Oh how times have changed.

Great post 147. But using the word "attractive"? My own personal point of view would maybe 25% of models qualify on that score. Whilst the other 75% rely solely on saying "baby" three fucking times every sentence.

(05-06-2015 14:12 )Broncobilly Wrote:  The same girls always try to perform and the same lazy girls don't

i thought you blamed the production and not the girls?

(05-06-2015 16:23 )Joey 27 Wrote:  

(05-06-2015 14:12 )Broncobilly Wrote:  The same girls always try to perform and the same lazy girls don't

i thought you blamed the production and not the girls?

In most cases it's production but there are some lazy performers

(05-06-2015 16:36 )Broncobilly Wrote:  

(05-06-2015 16:23 )Joey 27 Wrote:  

(05-06-2015 14:12 )Broncobilly Wrote:  The same girls always try to perform and the same lazy girls don't

i thought you blamed the production and not the girls?

In most cases it's production but there are some lazy performers

It's the popular paradox - some performers are only crap when it's the producer's fault, others are crap all the time.