09-11-2022, 16:06
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
09-11-2022, 22:05
^ Ugh, the most boring tame channel on TV zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
10-11-2022, 04:15
I've mixed feelings, at best, about all the channels, including Xpanded: https://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.p...pid2684317
https://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.p...pid2719799 that latter link is from just last month.
Plus, I'm no great fan of Ms Knight: https://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.p...pid2620253
However, I'm still puzzled by your posts' repeating the same thing, in different threads.
"The most boring tame channel on tv", by contrast with what?
The terms and conditions of being on tv, have never meant there was likely to be much of this, alas: https://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.p...pid1417175
But, personally, that's part of what I watch full-on porn for.
Although I've reiterated one of my mottos, #morefleshlessfabric in a number of my posts, I've also said that I don't see the point in women taking their knickers off, on tv.
As it restricts the tv camera positions, resulting in less of the women's bodies' appearing on tv.
I'm less interested in dirty talk, on its own, than as an accompaniment to actual sex. Hence, as I've posted, I've never had any inclination to phone.
I'm much more visually focused, but still like to hear what the women's voices are like, on-air, or better, on pervecam.
Nonetheless, I did rather change my mind, about wanting Xpanded to have on-air mics. As on BS and 66, their use has either been fraught with technical problems, or overused.
That I've found few women's voices, especially attractive or alluring, also means I've 'welcomed' the added 'mystery'.
Notwithstanding, as I said in my nine-year overview post about set design, the only time I heard Alicia/Elley speak on a ('Freeview') tv channel, as distinct from a recording I've watched online, was one time she spoke on an early (Xpanded!) daytime shift!
A week or so ago, I did start going through my posts about 66, to prepare an overview post, but put it on hold.
I might still do it, within the next week, as it will give me an opportunity to precis my arguments that 66's 'tease hours' were among the worst ideas executed by the channels, only to be possibly outdone by its effective sequel, 66's 'daytime chat', or whatever it was called...
https://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.p...pid2719799 that latter link is from just last month.
Plus, I'm no great fan of Ms Knight: https://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.p...pid2620253
However, I'm still puzzled by your posts' repeating the same thing, in different threads.
"The most boring tame channel on tv", by contrast with what?
The terms and conditions of being on tv, have never meant there was likely to be much of this, alas: https://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.p...pid1417175
But, personally, that's part of what I watch full-on porn for.
Although I've reiterated one of my mottos, #morefleshlessfabric in a number of my posts, I've also said that I don't see the point in women taking their knickers off, on tv.
As it restricts the tv camera positions, resulting in less of the women's bodies' appearing on tv.
I'm less interested in dirty talk, on its own, than as an accompaniment to actual sex. Hence, as I've posted, I've never had any inclination to phone.
I'm much more visually focused, but still like to hear what the women's voices are like, on-air, or better, on pervecam.
Nonetheless, I did rather change my mind, about wanting Xpanded to have on-air mics. As on BS and 66, their use has either been fraught with technical problems, or overused.
That I've found few women's voices, especially attractive or alluring, also means I've 'welcomed' the added 'mystery'.
Notwithstanding, as I said in my nine-year overview post about set design, the only time I heard Alicia/Elley speak on a ('Freeview') tv channel, as distinct from a recording I've watched online, was one time she spoke on an early (Xpanded!) daytime shift!
A week or so ago, I did start going through my posts about 66, to prepare an overview post, but put it on hold.
I might still do it, within the next week, as it will give me an opportunity to precis my arguments that 66's 'tease hours' were among the worst ideas executed by the channels, only to be possibly outdone by its effective sequel, 66's 'daytime chat', or whatever it was called...
10-11-2022, 06:05
I wonder if there are any interested parties in buying st66? And if so what wouild theyu be inheriting? I would think a bug riddled website is probably one
10-11-2022, 11:30
Look dude, what is there left to sell here? The studio was rented, it went. The epg slot on Sky was rented, it went. (Same with the FV before it.) All they had left was the brand name, their ability to recruit and a never quite up to concept website plus url.
They then proceeded to piss on any reputation they had with babes, so their ability to recruit is now in the toilet. This and the capitulation in live streaming will have also damaged the idea, already much weakened, of what the 66 brand amounts to amongst punters. Any "interested parties" would look bloody hard at such stuff. And so there's almost zero value in such a tarnished name or site at this point. (Even without all that, remember this industry hasn't had a new operator for the last third of its existence! Times are massively tough. There's no cavalry right now. Likely never.)
The same thing happened with the last owners of RLC. You can only run things down, cost cut, niche-iffy for so long. The market and the ecomony will eventually speak its last on you. There comes a point when your own self interest will compel the end and force you to get the fuck out! And if that goes down badly, as here, there's no coming back because your name will have gone down with it.
They then proceeded to piss on any reputation they had with babes, so their ability to recruit is now in the toilet. This and the capitulation in live streaming will have also damaged the idea, already much weakened, of what the 66 brand amounts to amongst punters. Any "interested parties" would look bloody hard at such stuff. And so there's almost zero value in such a tarnished name or site at this point. (Even without all that, remember this industry hasn't had a new operator for the last third of its existence! Times are massively tough. There's no cavalry right now. Likely never.)
The same thing happened with the last owners of RLC. You can only run things down, cost cut, niche-iffy for so long. The market and the ecomony will eventually speak its last on you. There comes a point when your own self interest will compel the end and force you to get the fuck out! And if that goes down badly, as here, there's no coming back because your name will have gone down with it.
10-11-2022, 20:46
I googled 'Studio 66' to confirm that it's a name used by many and various businesses, and this was at the top of results: https://www.ofcom.org.uk/news-centre/202...-sanctions
It was fined £15,000 in August! I expect some other posters already knew this, but it was news to me.
The filter bubble means that Google knowing more about me than nearly any individual friend or relative does, would place that atop such search results.
'Studio 66' as a brand name, is so unexceptional anyway, that it would have substantial value in itself, only if one company emerged to be dominantly associated with it.
Re: RLC, wasn't Xpanded the last owner of RLC/Playboy TV, or did I miss something??!
As I said in my nine-year overview post about set design, I never understood the point of the over-elaborate RLC sets, as the women should be the overwhelming focus, and busy sets just get in the way.
Hence, the minimal Xpanded set is the least worst.
Those sets must have cost more £€$ than they were worth!
Definitely among the worst ideas executed by the channels, to add to those I suggested in my previous post in this thread (363).
It was fined £15,000 in August! I expect some other posters already knew this, but it was news to me.
The filter bubble means that Google knowing more about me than nearly any individual friend or relative does, would place that atop such search results.
'Studio 66' as a brand name, is so unexceptional anyway, that it would have substantial value in itself, only if one company emerged to be dominantly associated with it.
Re: RLC, wasn't Xpanded the last owner of RLC/Playboy TV, or did I miss something??!
As I said in my nine-year overview post about set design, I never understood the point of the over-elaborate RLC sets, as the women should be the overwhelming focus, and busy sets just get in the way.
Hence, the minimal Xpanded set is the least worst.
Those sets must have cost more £€$ than they were worth!
Definitely among the worst ideas executed by the channels, to add to those I suggested in my previous post in this thread (363).
10-11-2022, 22:06
These guys missed out on a niche market but growing old shows upscaled or hd format for subscriber base. I miss the old shows pre-perv cam that imo ruined the experience.
Now ppl can get free views on online cam sites these guys missed the boat on many occasions. Dont adapt go extinct. Why would new talent go through the rigmarole and get a slither of a big pie by going on tv yes the tv audience etc but nowadays you can go it alone if you have the right bod and charisma online.
Now ppl can get free views on online cam sites these guys missed the boat on many occasions. Dont adapt go extinct. Why would new talent go through the rigmarole and get a slither of a big pie by going on tv yes the tv audience etc but nowadays you can go it alone if you have the right bod and charisma online.
11-11-2022, 00:54
There's some amazing threads on here by shandhand and seducedx6 and ur right there's hardly anything for sale and what can be sold that money will be going to pay off what ever debt is left like babes wages loans rental electric gas water rates small businesses that gave them credit photographs some punters with credit in there account on s66 what I heard from a channel babe she stated in her chatbox on bs to that s66 were giving to my credit away without people buying it.
It could come back under a different name and management but they now have no babes and who would go back there Jada cameo has been burnt by this twice now.remember skin TV where all the best babes went to and after a while they started not getting paid then it folded oweing babes loads of money in which I don't think they got and they found it hard to get work again for a while some even retired because of it
Here we go now that's it's folded if you had the money to bring it back what would you do to make it different than the other channels
It could come back under a different name and management but they now have no babes and who would go back there Jada cameo has been burnt by this twice now.remember skin TV where all the best babes went to and after a while they started not getting paid then it folded oweing babes loads of money in which I don't think they got and they found it hard to get work again for a while some even retired because of it
Here we go now that's it's folded if you had the money to bring it back what would you do to make it different than the other channels
11-11-2022, 16:26
Don't forget to include (as mentioned in post 366 above) the £15,000 fine in August!
11-11-2022, 19:01
(10-11-2022 06:05 )lovebabes56 Wrote: [ -> ]I wonder if there are any interested parties in buying st66? And if so what wouild theyu be inheriting? I would think a bug riddled website is probably one
Netflix are looking into buying live stuff , can you imagine S66 on Netflix.
