(22-11-2010 00:33 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]bangbabes are struggling for calls as they are sending dionne home at midnight according to her facebook, a decision which has upset dionne
i have nothing against Dionne i think she is great and she seems to have upped her game just lately , but she has to realise that there are other girls that work for Bangbabes that also want shifts , Dionne has far as i can remember been on for the last 3 or 4 night so should give the other girls a chance and not let it upset her .
Indeed, Donna Duke came on at midnight to replace her but being Sunday I was half expecting Adele.
If this problem lasts more than a day or two more they really are going to have issues with who gets the shifts.
i am glad Dionne was on the last 3 or 4 nights she is a top babe who deserves to be on 3 or 4 nights
(22-11-2010 01:45 )mr mystery Wrote: [ -> ]i have nothing against Dionne i think she is great and she seems to have upped her game just lately , but she has to realise that there are other girls that work for Bangbabes that also want shifts , Dionne has far as i can remember been on for the last 3 or 4 night so should give the other girls a chance and not let it upset her .
Dionne does 3-4 nights in a row, then she isn't on for 3-4 nights, no different than most of the girls who do a shift or two on alternate days. I think it was the manner in which she was informed of the shift change that annoyed her, was basically told to go home at midnight. Had it been scheduled and she knew about it, it would have been different. Here is hat she posted, it anyone's wondering.
"Well boys I must be doing something wrong ?? Just been Asked to leave at 12:00! Feel so let down, made extra effort, worked my butt off when they are girls short & now this........sorry to disappoint everyone!!!!!!!!!"
Lack of calls, limited shifts. They better solve this situation soon, as poor Tori won't be able to earn her bonus if things don't pick up.
(20-11-2010 14:47 )mr mystery Wrote: [ -> ]I think Bangmedia have been up to something in regards the channel name re-branding and changing channels 912 and 959 from "Tease me" to TMTN 1 and 2 , this was done for a reason , i just wonder if they acquired a different licence for these 2 channel , a European licence perhaps , and is this the loophole Bangmedia mentions , if so have Ofcom decided not to allow Sky to transmit channels using this licence and is this why the channels have been removed from the Sky EPG , the girls on Ch 912 have been doing far more explicit shows in the last few weeks than any of the other channels , the girls are even allowed to put their hands down their knickers and have a good play , this has been outlawed for years , i definitely think the removal of the channels has got some thing to do with this loophole and the re naming of the channels , i have no evidence of this but seeing as this thread is a chat and discussion section i thought i would offer a few of my thoughts , i am probably totally wrong tho , i usually am lol .
Another here in support of this theory. The material on 902 since 912/959's disappearance has been nowhere near as explicit. In fact I can't recall a single, knickerless session since it happened.
(20-11-2010 14:47 )mr mystery Wrote: [ -> ]I think Bangmedia have been up to something in regards the channel name re-branding and changing channels 912 and 959 from "Tease me" to TMTN 1 and 2 , this was done for a reason , i just wonder if they acquired a different licence for these 2 channel , a European licence perhaps , and is this the loophole Bangmedia mentions
The licences for those 2 channels are Dutch, but Ofcom cannot prevent the transmission of channels just because the licences are Dutch.
![[Image: bb_109.jpg]](http://www.imagechunk.com/images/bb_109.jpg)