The UK Babe Channels Forum

I only voted for 7 night babes and 5 got in the top 10.

I voted for 9 day babes and only 1 made the top 10.

Am I watching in a parallel universe during the daytime, via a wormhole that only operates during daylight?

(10-06-2018 23:38 )winsaw Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-06-2018 22:09 )ShandyHand Wrote: [ -> ]How about a babe form of eurovision. We rank the babes in the 10 one to ten and a score is given based on each of those rankings. Highest scorer wins.

i tried a format like this out on the queen of RLC vote last year thought it worked well, did 5 points for your first chose girl through to 1 for you 5th place girl, its differently a system to think about for a bigger vote

And I do the same for S66 Cougars and it works for me.

What happens if someone just gives you one girls score

e.g. I give 10 votes to Patti, and I don't want to award any other votes

(12-06-2018 14:37 )Charlemagne Wrote: [ -> ]What happens if someone just gives you one girls score

e.g. I give 10 votes to Patti, and I don't want to award any other votes

it dose happen that people will only pick one or 2 girls but i have found that 90% of people will not do this so i dont think it would change a vote really,

It's all going to end in tears, just like every other attempt along these lines.

At least a straight "pick 1 from 10" scores over "I've randomly drawn the final 8 names into a head2head contest, honest".

what I would love to see is what the actual 2018 awards design actually looks like & also would forum members be allowed a vote on any of the other award categories on your site, or are those categories limited to those that work in the industry itself?

(13-06-2018 06:24 )babelover48 Wrote: [ -> ]what I would love to see is what the actual 2018 awards design actually looks...

I think the implication was that it'll be like the one pictured on the first page of this thread mate.

Another voting option is:
that we have another round where we vote for the top 3 finalists.
Then followed up later with another vote for the winner

Disadvantage is that causes the organiser more work.

Advantage is we get a more accurate winner and that the result of the finialist voting could be announced at the awards

(12-06-2018 14:37 )Charlemagne Wrote: [ -> ]What happens if someone just gives you one girls score

e.g. I give 10 votes to Patti, and I don't want to award any other votes

There is a formula to sort such situations out.
It is only a suggestion and no doubt the 'You are wrong' brigade will find fault and turn up to discredit it but here it is anyway .
I reiterate this is NOT the definitive solution it is merely an idea .

I will use an example system where everyone in theory nominates four babes in ranking order with 1st place getting 4 pts down to 4th place getting 1 point.
With this exact system 10 points are allocated across the 4 positions.
40% i.e 4 out of 10 go to 1st place
30% i.e 3 out of 10 go to 2nd place
20% i.e 2 out of 10 go to 3rd place
10% i.e 1 out of 10 go to 4th place.

Now lets say someone only nominates 1 babe rather than 4. This means only 4 points are allocatable. So the chosen babe will receive 40% of those 4 points which equates to 1.6 points. Obviously the incentive is there to get people to rank more babes rather than just one in order that their favourite can receive a higher amount of points resulting from between 2 and 4 names submitted.

So for example lets say somebody submits a top 3 rather than a top 4.
This means that 9 points out of 10 can be allocated as the 1 point for 4th place no longer applies.
1st place would receive 40% of 9 points = 3.6 points
2nd place would receive 30% of 9 points = 2.7 points
3rd place would receive 20% of 9 points = 1.8 points

If somebody submits a top two rather than a top 4 the result would be thus:
7 points out of the original 10 can be allocated.
1st place would receive 40% of 7 points i.e 2.8 points
2nd place would receive 30% of 7 points = 2.1 points.

Now obviously the percentages change depending on how many ranking positions are requested but once the percentages are known and the total number of points that can be allocated is known it can be worked out on a calculator what points to allocate to whom.

Snookered runs off to the shed before the barrage ensues .

An unintended effect of what snookered has suggested :

Voter has a favourite girl who they want to win and would give all their votes to her for maximum advantage. However, some pesky forumite has devised a fiendish system which devalues their vote unless they nominate a full list of 4 choices.
Now this risks unintentionally handing the award to the arch-rival if the final tally is very close and it comes down to those 2 or 3 points that you never really wanted to give to her.
So what to do? Make a calculated decision of who is least likely from the list to win, and give them the 2nd, 3rd and 4th place votes. Surely then there is no risk to your favourite. Aha, but what if everybody else has the same idea? Then a great shocker as the least favourite girl with the bookies walks away with the prize, even though almost nobody wanted that.