boring mr p shows tonite from jasmin and taylor wit little contact
nicole sophie and danni on 2nite with no ass spanking or pussy licking mr p shows
the sissy producers must be on
which lucky p is slamming danni now
is it real? kinda looks so
(24-03-2018 01:07 )terence Wrote: [ -> ] (24-03-2018 01:05 )diggertroc Wrote: [ -> ]is it real? kinda looks so
no it;s not real.
what ever is happenings we want mr p to do ashley emma & alice over the desk next
The gullibility/desperation of some people is unbelievable.
^ The point is it was shot and styled quite believabley for a change. It's a marked step up from the usual pap.
On the other hand, there's something piss taking about 'the look what I get to do' nature of such sessions. They mock the audience somewhat with that and the fakery.
danni doing her second show now and it is her best pov ever on babestation
(24-03-2018 03:04 )forumdude Wrote: [ -> ]mr p shows are happening for months.they advertise on tv logos everytime i dont think ofcom can do anything when it is for off screen pervcam.most majority of babes on bs have done these shows and danni is doing one again now
I think posters are aware of that. I read it that they're just commenting because of the eye-catching and prolonged, supposedly full-on, nature of the beast here. Neither is anyone critising the babes but more the format (hence my moving this response here).
Generally I have two problems with sessions of this sort:
1) It's a bastardisation of the conception of the babeshow and its USP. The shows have always been dependent on the illusion of the babes availabilty to, and direct interaction with the customer. Involving a third party destroys the illusion and the individuality of the shows. It turns them into some hybrid of cheap gonzo and that 'just offscreen' nastiness of those Electric Blue vhs' in the 80 and 90s! Everyone has moved on from this but UK producers keep finding ways to bring it back. Suggesting someone in the studio is having a better time than the customer is always going to be subverting.
2) I don't know how much contact there was on perv but it can't have been much more than the bump and grind and palming we've already seen. The trouble comes with playing on guys' need to believe this could be any more than that. I can't see how the cam version can have been anything but a disappointment to punters when so much is implied on TV. Since when has 'ha ha tricked you' been a valid longterm business tactic at anything other than April Fools? In other words, this is just yet another example of fast buck-ism and contempt for the customer experience from the current BS bosses.