(24-03-2018 11:08 )ShandyHand Wrote: [ -> ] (24-03-2018 03:04 )forumdude Wrote: [ -> ]mr p shows are happening for months.they advertise on tv logos everytime i dont think ofcom can do anything when it is for off screen pervcam.most majority of babes on bs have done these shows and danni is doing one again now
I think posters are aware of that. I read it that they're just commenting because of the eye-catching and prolonged, supposedly full-on, nature of the beast here. Neither is anyone critising the babes but more the format (hence my moving this response here).
Generally I have two problems with sessions of this sort:
1) It's a bastardisation of the conception of the babeshow and its USP. The shows have always been dependent on the illusion of the babes availabilty to, and direct interaction with the customer. Involving a third party destroys the illusion and the individuality of the shows. It turns them into some hybrid of cheap gonzo and that 'just offscreen' nastiness of those Electric Blue vhs' in the 80 and 90s! Everyone has moved on from this but UK producers keep finding ways to bring it back. Suggesting someone in the studio is having a better time than the customer is always going to be subverting.
Are you the only one that thinks the gonzo of the 80s and 90s has gone out of fashion as I dont see many other people saying what you are saying. Besides remember what happens with fashion....it always repeats itself about 20 years apart?
^ No i was saying the Electric Blue type pretend stuff should be a thing of the past.
There's nothing wrong with regular pov on the shows (I'm a fan) but guys can imagine themselves as cameraman in that situation. The minute you have a specified Mr P concept you distance the audience from the action and make it more like regular porn (only without the required explicitness).
I wasn't meaning to imply points 1 and 2 would necessarily be a majority view either. Only that people's comments so far had been more around format than anything else.
(24-03-2018 11:08 )ShandyHand Wrote: [ -> ] (24-03-2018 03:04 )forumdude Wrote: [ -> ]mr p shows are happening for months.they advertise on tv logos everytime i dont think ofcom can do anything when it is for off screen pervcam.most majority of babes on bs have done these shows and danni is doing one again now
I think posters are aware of that. I read it that they're just commenting because of the eye-catching and prolonged, supposedly full-on, nature of the beast here. Neither is anyone critising the babes but more the format (hence my moving this response here).
Generally I have two problems with sessions of this sort:
1) It's a bastardisation of the conception of the babeshow and its USP. The shows have always been dependent on the illusion of the babes availabilty to, and direct interaction with the customer. Involving a third party destroys the illusion and the individuality of the shows. It turns them into some hybrid of cheap gonzo and that 'just offscreen' nastiness of those Electric Blue vhs' in the 80 and 90s! Everyone has moved on from this but UK producers keep finding ways to bring it back. Suggesting someone in the studio is having a better time than the customer is always going to be subverting.
2) I don't know how much contact there was on perv but it can't have been much more than the bump and grind and palming we've already seen. The trouble comes with playing on guys' need to believe this could be any more than that. I can't see how the cam version can have been anything but a disappointment to punters when so much is implied on TV. Since when has 'ha ha tricked you' been a valid longterm business tactic at anything other than April Fools? In other words, this is just yet another example of fast buck-ism and contempt for the customer experience from the current BS bosses.
While I agree that pretty much everything with Danni is faked (She's the best faker in the business), in the defense of some others, myself included, we sometimes believe things might be real (Rare when it happens) because of what we've seen from other channels in the past where things were much more "Legit". RLC, BB etc. Also on Babestation (Fingergate shhh), so when certain moments look a little less fakey, which is rare I'll admit, we sometimes wonder if they got away with something without us knowing.
I haven't seen much "real" activity or activity that I assume is more legit than usual in a long time, but it's one of the only reasons I continue to watch some of these sessions. If I do see something lately, I don't mention it here because I want it to continue, and I'd recommend others to keep things quiet if they actually saw something, because why ruin the fun for us.
Honestly, I'd rather see more full body shots during POVs than to have cameraman interaction, because lately it's 95% shoulder and back shots, which is lame. Alice last night was trying to show her ass during her POV, but nope, only shown on perv cam, making her TV view virtually pointless.
^ Absolutely. I'm not saying there is zero reason to believe something might be happening. We all want to imagine it might. And, yes, more so because stuff has happened on rare occassions in the past. But this session implied another level. And, crucially, things are different now, what's "offscreen" is not actually. Any 'events' can be preserved. Modern babes are going to be mega wary of that.
The current crowd at BS have form for deception too. I would say the chances of anything of that type actually happening for cam are miniscule. If it ever came it wouldn't be without fanfare either.
But my main point is just that kidding guys on with this kind of session doesn't really play to the shows' strengths nor is it the best way to ensure customers trust your product in the future.
Dannii was defo getting pumped last night, she gave him handjob/blowy at end and she defo had cum on her shoulder.
Sadly this content has put this programm on the sorrid path to more and more pornographic output, so sad.
Danni is a good actress and Mr P does not do anything with her like that, if he was found to have done so he would be either censured or sacked. What real proof have you got? How do you know there was something on her shoulder -even the porn industry play tricks on their viewers so I want ACTUAL proof she gave him a blowy and he left a deposit...otherwise stop posting this nonsense.
(27-09-2018 11:26 )The Apprentice Wrote: [ -> ]Sadly this content has put this programm on the sorrid path to more and more pornographic output, so sad.
so true. i mean, who want porn. ama right!
oh and for the record, it's all make believe and fantasy. it's just they've been doing it a while and have become quite good at it.
(27-09-2018 11:26 )The Apprentice Wrote: [ -> ]Sadly this content has put this programm on the sorrid path to more and more pornographic output, so sad.
The last two words of your post completely negated any meaningful comment you were trying to make