The UK Babe Channels Forum

^ That's a very poor excuse. (We see too many of these type of apologists posts here. Who are they trying to support, because it's mighty ineffectual...)

When one company employes another to provide a service to the public, the service they provide reflects directly on the original company - as it should because they have been backed them to that effect. When you don't get your internet parcel you don't complain to the courier company first off do you? The buck stops with the source company, always.

The operators shouldn't put up with a shoddy service representing them, especially one that directly affects their new business model. The streams are quite often not fit for purpose and guys are simply put off by struggling bandwidth, poor quality images, downtime and problems with faulty links.

The operators will be the losers for this. So they I'm sure should not be shrugging it off like you are.

(20-08-2017 09:39 )ShandyHand Wrote: [ -> ]^ That's a very poor excuse. (We see too many of these type of apologists posts here. Who are they trying to support, because it's mighty ineffectual...)

It's not an excuse and it's not an apology. You're deliberately distorting a simple statement of fact.

The problem was not at Babestation, it was at Firecall, meaning that Studio 66 was affected as well.

You said it as a direct counter to someone calling BS "a joke" - you quoted their post. You were defending BS against that accusation by trying to pass the buck to their third party supplier. People can judge that for what it is.

I explained why that doesn't wash. It still doesn't when you try to spread it still further. 66 should have better than Firestorm ate giving too. That they don't is their look out.

(20-08-2017 18:39 )ShandyHand Wrote: [ -> ]You were defending BS

More deliberate twisting of words.

Haven't you got anything better to do?

^ For once I agree with you: I am wasting my time on someone who is not even prepared to admit the basic pov of their own posts.