(28-01-2021 15:09 )Doddle Wrote: [ -> ] (25-01-2021 10:56 )Ultramantis Black Wrote: [ -> ]Boomer addressed this in the Darla Gunn thread and he's probably correct, the issue is that XP only use six girls throughout the day (seven for a weekend).
Call that 44 shifts for the week.
This is totally the sort of topic stuff that "General Discussion" is born to do 
No need to be a cunt about things with your smarmy laughing emoji.
Oh, and being laughed at by someone with 20,000 posts on a wanking forum! The irony.
Sorry for trying to promote some discussion.
Must do better!
(28-01-2021 15:09 )Doddle Wrote: [ -> ] (25-01-2021 10:56 )Ultramantis Black Wrote: [ -> ]Boomer addressed this in the Darla Gunn thread and he's probably correct, the issue is that XP only use six girls throughout the day (seven for a weekend).
Call that 44 shifts for the week.
This is totally the sort of topic stuff that "General Discussion" is born to do
I wouldn't discourage debate, regardless of whether it's in the appropriate thread or not. It is the purpose of a Forum. It's an organic thing, one post triggers another, & so on.
So much more worthy than stand-alone statements.
If necessary, a moderator would no doubt move posts if they see fit.
(28-01-2021 17:23 )Ultramantis Black Wrote: [ -> ]Oh, and being laughed at by someone with 20,000 posts on a wanking forum! The irony.
You've been here longer than I have, so that's no excuse.
Quote:Sorry for trying to promote some discussion.
Does the title "General Discussion" not ring any bells then?
Rather than using a babe's thread to ramble on about things other than that babe? Seems insulting to her really.
Oh well, never mind, worse things happen at sea I guess...
(28-01-2021 23:06 )Doddle Wrote: [ -> ] (28-01-2021 17:23 )Ultramantis Black Wrote: [ -> ]Oh, and being laughed at by someone with 20,000 posts on a wanking forum! The irony.
You've been here longer than I have, so that's no excuse. Quote:Sorry for trying to promote some discussion.
Does the title "General Discussion" not ring any bells then?
Rather than using a babe's thread to ramble on about things other than that babe? Seems insulting to her really.
Oh well, never mind, worse things happen at sea I guess...
It was 4 posts that followed a logical discussion. The initial post provoked a response, & so on. No rambling.
In no way is this insulting to Jenna Nova, it's concerning a channel she works for.
Rambling on, pot kettle.
Well, you probably already put it best:
(28-01-2021 20:53 )Boomerangutangangbang Wrote: [ -> ]If necessary, a moderator would no doubt move posts if they see fit.
(29-01-2021 09:19 )Doddle Wrote: [ -> ]Well, you probably already put it best: (28-01-2021 20:53 )Boomerangutangangbang Wrote: [ -> ]If necessary, a moderator would no doubt move posts if they see fit.
Yes I did.
& if it wasn't for you being pedantic in the first place this would be have been over with long ago.
A world without pedantry would be like a broken pencil.
I don't pretend to work out the numbers game with Xpanded, even with a smaller apparent roster and channels to work with, there doesn't seem a direct rhyme or reason to it. 2 x daytime slots a day x 1 or 2 babes per slot x some who don't do mornings or don't do afternoons x some who do nights as well, and so on.
(29-01-2021 14:40 )Doddle Wrote: [ -> ]A world without pedantry would be like a broken pencil.
Oh well, better late than never,
we got there (here) in the end.
Would've been better without the unpleasantness along the way. A little work on your diplomacy wouldn't go amiss.
Not sure that pedantry & a broken pencil is the most accurate analogy.
I meant no offence in the first place - I had no idea some people hit the roof in the face of smilies.
Is it just me, or have xpanded in the past week or so fallen back heavily on established performers and given less opportunities to the new girls? I always assumed they were entirely competition based and appearances depended solely on the number of calls generated, but a short while ago they did try and introduce a few fresh faces who since seem to have disappeared. Maybe as a result there was a significant dip in their call volumes and corresponding revenue.