(12-04-2012 20:34 )mellover Wrote: [ -> ] (12-04-2012 20:13 )tony confederate Wrote: [ -> ]How can that be true? No clinic would tell someone they were HIV positive without checking and double checking to make sure they were giving out the right test results.
As I said earlier, there are a lot of false positives. A test is a test, if you have a test and it's positive, that's all they can say. You only know it's a false positive when you get tested again and it's negative.
If you've gone for a test, they can't let you go with out saying the result of that test.
This is not a false positive, it is claimed to be a “clerical error“, if you Google the sop for NHS clinics when providing a positive test, you will see that the events as sje descibed do not play out the way she described. I just hope that the original Jessica Jensen doesn‘t get tarnished with these events.
Well why mention anything at all ? Why not let the news sink in, perhaps tell a few close friends / relatives before announcing on a public platform like twatter that you have HIV ?
(12-04-2012 22:53 )sala Wrote: [ -> ]This is not a false positive, it is claimed to be a “clerical error“
Seems unlikely. Time will out I suppose.
Maybe she's confused about this and doesn't really understand what a false positive is. Maybe she just assumes that if the test result was wrong the clinic must have screwed it up somehow.
(12-04-2012 22:57 )Money_Shot Wrote: [ -> ]Well why mention anything at all ? Why not let the news sink in, perhaps tell a few close friends / relatives before announcing on a public platform like twatter that you have HIV ?
Because she's being doing B/G shoots and it's absolutely essential to notify anyone she's recently worked with (and anyone they've worked with)?
Right, perhaps notifying people privately would be a decent move considering the sensitivity of the whole matter. Rather then tell the whole world.
(13-04-2012 00:29 )Money_Shot Wrote: [ -> ]Right, perhaps notifying people privately would be a decent move considering the sensitivity of the whole matter. Rather then tell the whole world.
So, imagine she's done scenes with say 5 guys since she was last tested. Those 5 guys have each done scenes with 5 different girls (now we're up to 30 people, 5 guys and 25 girls), and those 25 girls have each done scenes with 5 different guys (now we're up to 155 people).
Obviously I've made the figures up, but given the amount of people who'd have to be notified it would come out anyway. Far better to do the responsible thing and fess up to it rather than have all sorts of unconfirmed rumours swirling around causing panic.
Stevie , this could run and run. I just thought it seemed odd she posted it. No rumours, she stepped forwards.
Anyway let's not drag this out. Agree to disagree.
(12-05-2012 19:59 )Woiiii Wrote: [ -> ]are there any updates?
The girl in question is fully certed now and available for work again.