Good that it has come back negative, there will be relief all round. Maybee this episode will lead to more stringent rules in the future.
(12-04-2012 17:47 )rj242 Wrote: [ -> ]According to the latest twitterposts, the second test has come back negative - apparently Jessica was given the wrong persons blood results initially. Hope this is true and very happy for her if it is the case.
edit - been confirmed by AITA. Delighted for Jessica who has probably endured the hardest 48hrs of her life but I think it has been a bit of a wake-up call for everyone in the industry.
But it mean some person who thought they were clear is now having to come to the terms that they are positive
still its good news for the industry
Here's a link to a recent post on the BGAFD forum:
http://bgafd.co.uk/forum/read.php?f=5&i=193464&t=193464
It seems despite this scare (and what good news for the person involved so pleased for them) initial reaction is that all is well. Doesn't this scare show how using condoms etc in scenes would be better for all concerned?
Attention whoring at its worst she outed herself and seemed to be loving the attention, i had no clue who she was before as i doubt did many people. But shes made herself kinda well known off the back of this so yeah i call bullshit! The whole thing has seemed a little suss from the beginning.
Condoms in porn doesn't sell so it'll never happen especially in an already struggling UK industry - FACT
She needs to name the NHS trust that gave her “another persons“ positive test results, shameful that they could make such a mistake that scared so many people. And they told her that she was positive,yet made her wait over 48 hours for a re-test? Terrible. That is of course that any of this was genuine.
..
(12-04-2012 18:28 )tsurugi Wrote: [ -> ]Attention whoring at its worst she outed herself and seemed to be loving the attention, i had no clue who she was before as i doubt did many people. But shes made herself kinda well known off the back of this so yeah i call bullshit! The whole thing has seemed a little suss from the beginning.
Condoms in porn doesn't sell so it'll never happen especially in an already struggling UK industry - FACT
fair enough tsu, that's how you think, im not sure i agree with you based on what's come out fact wise. just glad its negative myself and jessica can move on, hope the person who got told she was negative but is positive now is as ok as she can be
I like the collective sigh of relief it's not a porn star. It's ok everybody, it's somebody else, not a porn 'star'. Eh? don't they matter then?
(12-04-2012 18:50 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]fair enough tsu, that's how you think, im not sure i agree with you based on what's come out fact wise. just glad its negative myself and jessica can move on
Why did they make her wait 48 hours to have another test? She made a post 6 days ago on bgafd where she was fully certed then contacted AIR 48 hours ago saying she was positive, but was more than likely due to a human error and now it comes back negative.....yeah i smell a rat.
(12-04-2012 19:07 )tsurugi Wrote: [ -> ]Why did they make her wait 48 hours to have another test? She made a post 6 days ago on bgafd where she was fully certed then contacted AIR 48 hours ago saying she was positive, but was more than likely due to a human error and now it comes back negative.....yeah i smell a rat.
What has come out "fact wise" that would cast doubt on Tsu's saying?
Making the whole thing up to boost her profile? - It is possible I suppose but that is a really risky stategy. On twitter she is being talked about as a girl who escorts unprotected and several people are now reluctant to work with her with some going as far as to suggest her adult career is over.