The UK Babe Channels Forum

I like pussy as much as the next guy, but I guess purely semantically, the cams could be described as "pervy" to the extent that for a lot of the time I'm guessing all they offer is a single continuous static close up shot of one area of the babes' body, ie. wherever the cam happens to be pointing at, presumably the crotch but not always (in my limited experience of using it ! ) so such a "restricted" view without any other context could be argued to be reasonably pervy - at least on TV with a reasonable cameraman you get a bit of an idea of what the rest of the babe looks like - even in close up they can actually pan the camera.
Unless the babe has the pervcam in her hand and is waving it about up and down herself, which I think we would notice on the TV so let's it face it noone has been brave/imaginative/stupid enough to do that, then basically you are logging on to see continuous static footage of a fairly motionless crotch in the same position ? After a minute or so, that's probably almost as dull as seeing the TV version of a motionless top-half from the shoulders up only shot of a babe sitting with a camera looking up her snatch supposedly (but not really ? playing with herself ?
If the babe's actually moving at all then I imagine (again from limited previous experience) what you are seeing is a blurred pixellated-to-buggery image which might as well have a big fat babestation badge all over it for all that you can actually see.

in some cases yeah your rite. but really a little imagination could make it less so. when i asked for the cams i said there and then i wasnt interested in a purely gino shot.
i guess they didnt read that bit
and yeah your rite it does seem a little pervy when it so close with nothing happening.

but like i said that wasnt the intention behind asking for them to be brought on set.
i thought they would move them about giving different shots from a slightly less intrusive distance.


so something like, when lori did her pov sets. the cam guy could get into position and keep it safe for tv. while the web cam gave a slightly more explicit shot.
maybe even showing some interaction between the babes and the ops as sometime happened in the past.
but i guess its the pussy thats bringing in the customers not the ability to see the girls doing there job in a less restrictive view.

Nobody wins....?

(24-08-2016 00:19 )M-L-L Wrote: [ -> ]I like pussy as much as the next guy, but I guess purely semantically, the cams could be described as "pervy" to the extent that for a lot of the time I'm guessing all they offer is a single continuous static close up shot of one area of the babes' body, ie. wherever the cam happens to be pointing at, presumably the crotch but not always (in my limited experience of using it ! ) so such a "restricted" view without any other context could be argued to be reasonably pervy - at least on TV with a reasonable cameraman you get a bit of an idea of what the rest of the babe looks like - even in close up they can actually pan the camera.
Unless the babe has the pervcam in her hand and is waving it about up and down herself, which I think we would notice on the TV so let's it face it noone has been brave/imaginative/stupid enough to do that, then basically you are logging on to see continuous static footage of a fairly motionless crotch in the same position ? After a minute or so, that's probably almost as dull as seeing the TV version of a motionless top-half from the shoulders up only shot of a babe sitting with a camera looking up her snatch supposedly (but not really ? playing with herself ?
If the babe's actually moving at all then I imagine (again from limited previous experience) what you are seeing is a blurred pixellated-to-buggery image which might as well have a big fat babestation badge all over it for all that you can actually see.

I'm sure I've seen a few girls holding the pervcam and lining it up for the "best" shot briefly before putting it down again; all in view of us TV viewers! But even so I hate the whole concept of pervcam; it really is destroying the shows!

An unscheduled appearance, but, oh dear, Lori's gone a bit 'curly mop' tonight!





At least she's solo, though, which, these days, is not just welcome, it's a fucking miracle!

^I don't mind the curls, but..

I'm guessing the Mistress Lori "Character" has been unofficially retired, which is such a shame as she showed great potential as a Mistress,


Then you see Mistress Jolie on the other side getting it spot on for 5 out of the last 6 weeks and you think come on Lori sort it out, so close to changing my allegiances...


It's been 5 months now...

^ She's magnificent... but frustrating, too!

Her wardrobe seems to consist of bra/panties or birthday suit!

She still looks gorgeous with the curls, just not quite as gorgeous as 'without them'!

(And, yes, Ella is looking fantastic, tonight! )

I can understand why she's so keen on getting naked, though ; I mean, what a body!

^^
Absolutely stunning.