Nice show, Nadia!!
She gave a sexy and spirited spicy show this morning, with a number of flashes. She was smiling, playful, and completely attentive to callers. She is gorgeous and in great shape. When she gives shows like this - too infrequent, unfortunately - you understand why she is a favorite! More like this, Nadia!
I much prefer to praise than to criticize, so to start with a compliment: dear management, THANK YOU for getting the webstream to work well these last couple of weeks, and for letting the girls give us wonderful spicy tease shows. If this could be the norm rather than the exception, what a win-win AC would be!!
But one complaint: the cameraman is ABSOLUTELY TERRIBLE!!! He should never do a close-up on a girl who is not on a phone call when the other girl is on the phone trying to perform for her caller. (He did this several times this morning.) He should also not do stupid, lingering close-ups of the performers' feet while they are on a call. A few nights ago when Nancy was working solo she had to tell the cameraman to move the camera on several occasions. In general, stop jerking the camera around. This is not rocket science! Frame both girls as large as you can while still keeping both in the picture, and let them perform. If you can't manage that, let the girls use the remote to zoom. Thank you.
Good Lord, what are they up to now on AC? This morning the boss and some other guy installed a bunch of new equipment - two small cameras on little quadrapods and apparently a small laptop on a small table to the right of the couch. So now you have one girl (Nadia this morning and Nancy this afternoon) seemingly performing for the laptop on their right and not looking into the camera. Since on the webstream at least we can only see the one camera view, this is TERRIBLE. If this turns out to be some kind of pervcam concept, it is going to be a disaster. It is no fun right now watching Nancy's attention completely turned away from the viewer. Does anyone know WTF is going on?
Just check at 'bs.com'
It is indeed pervecams. One could see a non-Thai person resetting these up earlier this morning since one (of two) had been left open to view (for free)
Also available at 'Repent'
Why should it be a disaster ? The whole point of a service is to make money. I would guess that since there are two then the laptop will be moved so that there is still a tv pic unlike @bs when the picture goes to logo during a pte request.
2nd guess. Methinks Amy will be very popular on this.
(15-08-2016 15:12 )DB83 Wrote: [ -> ]Just check at 'bs.com'
It is indeed pervecams. One could see a non-Thai person resetting these up earlier this morning since one (of two) had been left open to view (for free)
Also available at 'Repent'
Why should it be a disaster ? The whole point of a service is to make money. I would guess that since there are two then the laptop will be moved so that there is still a tv pic unlike @bs when the picture goes to logo during a pte request.
2nd guess. Methinks Amy will be very popular on this.
I think there are lots of reasons this may really suck, which are all chronicled on the London show threads and can be read there - it has meant lack of movement as girls are tied to these little cameras, they probably won't be moving up for close-ups to the regular camera as much, we will have to watch girls completely distracted from the view that we have with no eye contact. I also wonder what is going to happen to spicy show, which has been very nice recently with great nipple tease shows...now will the girls be flashing to the pervcams so that the rest of us can't see them? I think it also means that girls are going to be banging away on keyboards giving their little messages rather than performing.
And is this a subscription thing, or do we have to pay every time we want to see the girl perform for the pervcam? Maybe I am overreacting, but I think this going to be awful and it just may kill the whole thing for me.
I do not read all the threads on here and I also watch s66 more than AC but channels do adapt.
For Bs, and like it or not AC is now a Bs service, copied the s66 concept of the pervecams although it could equally be argued that s66 copied the Bs naughty-chat service.
Whether you like it or not, many on here would rather w@nk of to a closeup view of a girl's lower regions rather than pick up the phone and try talking. And at the end of the day it is the payer that all these services matter about.
This is not directed to you wim since you are a paying customer but many on here, and elsewhere, who shout the loudest have paid hardly a buck. In the past, elsewhere, I was equally guilty of that. We think we are providing constructive criticism to make the channels better. But at the end of the day the channels do not give a toss of what we write. And some are just as dismissive to those that make a substantial contribution to their coffers.
FYI pervecams are glorified webcam shows. You do pay per minute - the equivalent of 3UK£. Or 5UK£ for a private performance of-screen. So it is not cheap. But guys (and girls) are prepared to cough up and whilst there are payers these will continue.
They need to sort out the basics and improve the lighting before they worry about pervecams. So gloomy on that set you cannot see a hand in front of you.
(15-08-2016 16:40 )DB83 Wrote: [ -> ]I do not read all the threads on here and I also watch s66 more than AC but channels do adapt.
For Bs, and like it or not AC is now a Bs service, copied the s66 concept of the pervecams although it could equally be argued that s66 copied the Bs naughty-chat service.
Whether you like it or not, many on here would rather w@nk of to a closeup view of a girl's lower regions rather than pick up the phone and try talking. And at the end of the day it is the payer that all these services matter about.
This is not directed to you wim since you are a paying customer but many on here, and elsewhere, who shout the loudest have paid hardly a buck. In the past, elsewhere, I was equally guilty of that. We think we are providing constructive criticism to make the channels better. But at the end of the day the channels do not give a toss of what we write. And some are just as dismissive to those that make a substantial contribution to their coffers.
FYI pervecams are glorified webcam shows. You do pay per minute - the equivalent of 3UK£. Or 5UK£ for a private performance of-screen. So it is not cheap. But guys (and girls) are prepared to cough up and whilst there are payers these will continue.
Thanks, DB; it's nice that this is a cordial forum where we can discuss things in a friendly way. What you say about them only being concerned with how much money they can squeeze out of us is beyond dispute; I've always been overly idealistic thinking that these channels would want to increase customer satisfaction (especially where it is easy and costs nothing to do it) as a way to better revenues - but this is not the industry for that kind of thinking, is it? And I am sure that your characterization of their rationale for doing this is right.
Seems like pay more to get less. 3 quid per minute to see a girl's panties. No thanks. If one pays 5 pounds/min for off-screen can he see nudity during the day show? I don't think the AC studio is set up, or big enough, for that, and Thai laws may prohibit it. What will get for our money? I can't afford that in any case.
Partially I am lamenting the fact that as AC is progressively swallowed into the Babestation machine, it becomes less unique and different, less Thai, less interesting. I have loved AC precisely because it was not a BS clone. It has always had a different vibe, more exotic, more playful, less "filthy."
Now I will be fine with this if they do one of two things: a) start to broadcast spicy show through the night rather than closing down at 10:00; or b) have a separate "chat room" for a girl doing the pervcam, so the other girl(s) can carry on with the regular phone calls - maybe rotating the girls around. If they don't do one of these things, it seems we'll get the disadvantages of BS with few of the benefits.
Maybe I am a little too "old school," or nostalgic. I will try to keep an open mind and see how this plays out. So far I am not impressed or motivated to join in.
Day 2 of the pervcam era at Asian Connections, and the results are not good. I know that the presenters need time to get used to the format, but what I see is instead of two girls performing well for one camera, we have two girls, each doing poorly trying to perform for two cameras at once - and I don't know how they are going to resolve that. It's not their fault; it's the format. Nancy, who should have been giving us another of her incredibly erotic and enjoyable tease shows, spent way too much time with her back to the main camera, presumably so whoever was on the pervcam could see her ass. The quality of both girls' performance was compromised. I really don't think I want to call if the presenter's attention is divided between me and someone on the pervcam line typing requests and lurid comments, to which the girl's response is expected. For the considerable amount of money I'm paying to call, I want the girl's undivided attention.
the whole point of perv cam is that you dont actually get to talk or type to the girls. what they are supposed to do, is show you something you are not allowed to see on TV.
so, when someone selects the perv cam feature the girls normally have it placed to see between their legs and the main camera cant see the same shot. some will happily show their pussy and play and others will just play over their panties
now, this isnt happening on this channel because this channel is shite
Well, thank you pervcam for an incredibly LAME spicy show. You can really see now how it changes the whole dynamic of the program. Nancy, who had been giving a string of smoking hot nipple tease shows (and whom I praised as having become a top performer), spent most of the time with her body facing the pervcam, even when on a call, and she did not flash a nipple at all - not one!! I can't believe she is unwilling - the boss or one of these other feckless wankers in management must have told her not to. And Nana was Nana: though she is wearing less clothing, she has never shown anything and probably never will. The only bright spot was a couple of daring pussy flashes by Nancy - but not a bit of nipple - go figure! So congratulations, Babestation, looks like you are poised to destroy yet another channel.
