(30-04-2014 02:18 )Phonebook Wrote: [ -> ]Are you having a laugh? Is he having a laugh?
nope because as far as im concerned overall it was an improved performance from mica last night, especially compared to her last show before last night. especially loved her stint in the alleyway last night
Just an observation not only is Mica still the most stunning natural beauty on the channels,but noticed that the ring she has been wearing on her engagement ring finger for about 2yrs is now on her right hand.
(30-04-2014 09:40 )bombshell Wrote: [ -> ]Just an observation not only is Mica still the most stunning natural beauty on the channels,but noticed that the ring she has been wearing on her engagement ring finger for about 2yrs is now on her right hand.
I never believed she was engaged, as I know some of the women wear these rings so that callers don't think they are single.
Clare even wore a ring in the past, but still no wedding...
Sometimes in the past, you could hear certain women (Not Mica or Clare) moaning in the background while on their "breaks", and when I made a comment to someone here, they responded with, "No way, they're engaged"...
I really enjoyed her first stint in the alleyway
but after that all I could think to myself was 'Anyone got any oil handy?'.
Mica in the alleyway last night was excellent. For me she's still one of the best girls on Studio 66.
(30-04-2014 10:32 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]I never believed she was engaged, as I know some of the women wear these rings so that callers don't think they are single.
Clare even wore a ring in the past, but still no wedding...
Sometimes in the past, you could hear certain women (Not Mica or Clare) moaning in the background while on their "breaks", and when I made a comment to someone here, they responded with, "No way, they're engaged"...
I just remember that comment on twitter,where Mica refers to her Father -in law.
Such a gorgeous girl, but fuck me she is lazy!! I did not know whether she had no aptitude for the job or if it was laziness. Her first stint was teasing, sexy and stimulating. What followed in her remaining 3hrs+ was pure abysmal, resulting in her having on more clothes that some girls walking down the street
Her performances of late smack of somebody who knows regardless of how they perform they will be given shifts. With this the case of course she is going to put in minimal effort unless the mood takes her, which it did briefly last night.
This can be said for many of the women. They are pals with the crew/producers, and know that they will most likely have work, unless absolutely no calls come in, which doesn't seem to be the case. I wonder what the incentive is with keeping some of the women who don't move much, or who don't bring in as many calls.
I still think the studio should have a visit day, where we can show up and pay a fee for some private dances lol
I'm serious too!
(30-04-2014 12:43 )Whynot Wrote: [ -> ]Such a gorgeous girl, but fuck me she is lazy!! I did not know whether she had no aptitude for the job or if it was laziness. Her first stint was teasing, sexy and stimulating. What followed in her remaining 3hrs+ was pure abysmal, resulting in her having on more clothes that some girls walking down the street
Her performances of late smack of somebody who knows regardless of how they perform they will be given shifts. With this the case of course she is going to put in minimal effort unless the mood takes her, which it did briefly last night.
I have not watched the channels for a couple of years now,i scroll through for about 15mins 2/3 times a week,the reason i dont is that they are just not as good as they were,as for Mica having the aptitude she certainly has that,what i do not get is why you continued to watch for another three hours,i think a lot of members just say what they think others want to hear.
(30-04-2014 13:27 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]This can be said for many of the women. They are pals with the crew/producers, and know that they will most likely have work, unless absolutely no calls come in, which doesn't seem to be the case. I wonder what the incentive is with keeping some of the women who don't move much, or who don't bring in as many calls.
I think the problem is replacing them. The advent of webcams has meant that perhaps the job doesn't have the financial draw it once did. I see some odd things happening where you a cracking performer (lets take Lexi Mitchell as the example) who comes in, appears to take a lot calls, puts the effort in and then doesn't appear again for whatever reason. She would have seemed a shoe in to replace some of the girls who don't seem to get many calls; perhaps Lexi decided it wasn't for her and she's back camming now.
You clearly get the superstars who seem to pull in the calls which probably cost more, but even the deadwood fill a slot and generate some revenue. Any replacement has to be better