(23-02-2010 02:42 )BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL Wrote: [ -> ]Or are you only interested in finding opportunities to pop at BB - as you have on another Forum ?
Much like the pops you have had against this forum elsewhere.
And incidentally, I couldn't care less about either side of the arguement on these pages as it is little more than petty squabbling over something that in no way merits such attention. However, I do draw the line at a form of sexuality being used as a derogatory term in the manner of a 13 year old boy.
I have no more to say.
(23-02-2010 02:48 )SxciiSooky Wrote: [ -> ] (23-02-2010 02:42 )BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL Wrote: [ -> ]Or are you only interested in finding opportunities to pop at BB - as you have on another Forum ?
Much like the pops you have had against this forum elsewhere.
And incidentally, I couldn't care less about either side of the arguement on these pages as it is little more than petty squabbling over something that in no way merits such attention. However, I do draw the line at a form of sexuality being used as a derogatory term in the manner of a 13 year old boy.
I have no more to say.
So you continue to dig your heel into us, while refusing to answer our response: "So, it is good forum etiquette is it to hurl highly offensive abuse at performers is it ? Because that is where this series of posts started."
You wish to ciriticise us for responding to Abuse, but you refuse to criticise the Abusers, having yourself posted the Forum Rule which prohibits abuse.
And your snide 13 year old remark is posted in defiance of: [a] the Wikipedia article on the use of the word 'Gay', which we brought to your attention, and [b] our clear answer to your question about what actual Gay performers think of its use.
You're not obliged to respond. We can all simply get back to having fun.
(23-02-2010 03:19 )BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL Wrote: [ -> ]So you continue to dig your heel into us, while refusing to answer our response: "So, it is good forum etiquette is it to hurl highly offensive abuse at performers is it ? Because that is where this series of posts started."
You wish to ciriticise us for responding to Abuse, but you refuse to criticise the Abusers, having yourself posted the Forum Rule which prohibits abuse.
And your snide 13 year old remark is posted in defiance of: [a] the Wikipedia article on the use of the word 'Gay', which we brought to your attention, and [b] our clear answer to your question about what actual Gay performers think of its use.
You're not obliged to respond. We can all simply get back to having fun.
My post answered my stance in regards to the rest of the goings on in this thread - the fact is
my point is in regards to the terms you use.
This was also posted before I saw your other post on the matter - yet would have made not one bit of difference as I do not rely on wikipedia to form the basis of my opinion on something. The youth of today can claim the word means whatever they like, but I was of the opinion you had to be an adult to join here.
May I suggest, rather than feeling the need to perpetually argue your point ad nauseum, you would perhaps be better served ignoring what you class as abusive posts, and instead rely on the quality of your companys work to prove your point. This would at least show that you at least have confidence in its quality.
Now this
will be my final point. You would perhaps be better served taking it as a point of finality to your posts on the matter as well.
Quote:My post answered my stance in regards to the rest of the goings on in this thread - the fact is my point is in regards to the terms you use.
This was also posted before I saw your other post on the matter - yet would have made not one bit of difference as I do not rely on wikipedia to form the basis of my opinion on something. The youth of today can claim the word means whatever they like, but I was of the opinion you had to be an adult to join here.
The 'youth of today' is not responsible for
"the campaign against homophobia was launched in Britain under the slogan "homophobia is gay"." The adult gay community is. And how do you know that the person posting this on behalf of BB is not himself gay hmmm ?
We understand you felt offended by our use of the word. We have now traded some posts so that you have awareness that our use is not considered offensive by the gay community. You can choose to continue to regard yourself as offended for some other reason.
Or we can put the matter down to a misunderstanding. How's that ?
If you feel you didn't mean the term as a derogatory remark, then I will accept that and we can move on.
But please be aware of what you say in future and the offense it may cause others
I personally don’t have anything against the girls although I whish I did hehe
My problem is most of Bluebirds movies is so of putting that I wish another company did them instead of BB. Example in Most of BB movies the girls keep all their clothes on. Why BB gets them to do that I’ve no idea because with porn your meant to see All of the girls body Not bits!!!!
They made a complete balls up of Sasha’s & Porcha’s movies what’s the bets they’ve done it to Anna’s also…
The bluebird company have sent me the scene i paid for now, i retract my previous comments as they have definatly done good by me, very helpful, and the quality of the scene were very good, i would definatly purchase from them again, thanks
bluebird
i have sat here for the last hour or so going throught this thread and i still havent found out what i really want to know and that is 'when is the TJ-Mel Rook video coming out please?
I dont understand all the stuff that has been going back and forth with some of the people who have left bad remark about your company and i dont really care i for one didnt have a problem with your old site!!!!
So please can you tell me when i will be able to see this video?
Thanks
Heya....oo its getting heated on this part of the forum? Hope you guys like Yes Miss as you know it is my first ever G/G.....i have a few lined up with BB this year.....so hope you enjoy my first EVER!!! xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hey Anna.... too much testosterone or not enough bromide in the tea perhaps
Looking forward to see you get it on in Yes Miss and great that you're doing more