(19-02-2010 04:45 )messiah13 Wrote: [ -> ]Really looking forward to Mel's scene - just wish we had more than the 1 semi censored shot as a preview. 
Now at Mel's request - you got one: please see her thread.
(19-02-2010 21:03 )stueyboy Wrote: [ -> ]Roxana is physically attractive enough to be on any of the biggest babechannels (i.e. EliteTV, BangBabes and Babestation??) but I'm not sure about the personality, which might be the reason why she's such a dull "performer"...
She wasn't dull on the set of YES MISS ! today: not with Cindy Behr, Tommie Jo and others around !
At Mels request? does that mean that its just possible she may be in talks with you for more bluebird productions? fingers crossed......
Mel's shooting glamour with us every month and yes we are having discussions about a sequel.
But neither of us wants to do that until her Debut is out.
(20-02-2010 19:02 )messiah13 Wrote: [ -> ]At Mels request? does that mean that its just possible she may be in talks with you for more bluebird productions? fingers crossed......
Oh bless your little gossip club Vostok. You've been at this for quite a while.
And we have had to remind you before [on another Forum] that in the real world, Mel and the other models actually shoot for us - in our studio - day in and day out. So we do actually know the score with them.
Suppose its harmless that you have a little of hobby of pretending to know things.
Tsurugi: have you ever stopped to consider that by just 'thanking' everyone who says anything remotely anti-Bluebird, you appear to everyone on the Forum as acting with pathetic obsession ?
(20-02-2010 20:10 )vostok 1 Wrote: [ -> ] (20-02-2010 19:02 )messiah13 Wrote: [ -> ]At Mels request? does that mean that its just possible she may be in talks with you for more bluebird productions? fingers crossed......
http://www.themodelsclub.co.uk/forum/ind...t&p=111214
(21-02-2010 04:18 )BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL Wrote: [ -> ]Oh bless your little gossip club Vostok. You've been at this for quite a while.
And we have had to remind you before [on another Forum] that in the real world, Mel and the other models actually shoot for us - in our studio - day in and day out. So we do actually know the score with them.
Suppose its harmless that you have a little of hobby of pretending to know things.
Tsurugi: have you ever stopped to consider that by just 'thanking' everyone who says anything remotely anti-Bluebird, you appear to everyone on the Forum as acting with pathetic obsession ?
(20-02-2010 20:10 )vostok 1 Wrote: [ -> ] (20-02-2010 19:02 )messiah13 Wrote: [ -> ]At Mels request? does that mean that its just possible she may be in talks with you for more bluebird productions? fingers crossed......
http://www.themodelsclub.co.uk/forum/ind...t&p=111214
Did YOU ever think for a second Tsurugi loves winding you up and that you clearly think you're very important and influential.
In fact if you are important, tell us this:
When are you actually gonna get girls who like sex in your vids rather than washed up wannabes who couldn't act like they enjoyed it if their lives depended on it - too busy being worried about how they look than doing the smegging job in hand and if you wants to do g/g vids....would help if you got girls who are actually into girls and not just gay for pay.
Just an observation, try not to take the forum too seriously.
(21-02-2010 04:18 )BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL Wrote: [ -> ]Oh bless your little gossip club Vostok. You've been at this for quite a while.
And we have had to remind you before [on another Forum] that in the real world, Mel and the other models actually shoot for us - in our studio - day in and day out. So we do actually know the score with them.
I linked to a forum used by photographers in your industry.
The post that I linked to was made by someone who has hired and photographed Mel Rook. He claimed that he spoke to Mel on the phone recently, (in a professional basis, not as part of a "phone fantasy") who told him the situation that he mentioned in his post.
Now, if you wish to humiliate me to the forum and convincingly label me as an "anti-Blue-obsessive ®", then a good course of action would be to convey a message from Mel Rook stating that she finds my link to the models club forum as "Sad and Gay".
But please bear in mind, I have on no occasion published any criticism of the elderly, hairy, out of shape "Stud".
Best wishes to you and "The Stud".
(21-02-2010 05:00 )Gamehead Wrote: [ -> ]Did YOU ever think for a second Tsurugi loves winding you up and that you clearly think you're very important and influential.
Yes, we have considered that. But plainly it's not the case. Well we probably are important and influential since we are the largest production company in the uk and the only company in the uk who makes movies like 'yes miss'. We have also posted more free content for the forum fans than any other company.
(21-02-2010 05:00 )Gamehead Wrote: [ -> ]In fact if you are important, tell us this:
When are you actually gonna get girls who like sex in your vids rather than washed up wannabes who couldn't act like they enjoyed it if their lives depended on it - too busy being worried about how they look than doing the smegging job in hand and if you wants to do g/g vids....would help if you got girls who are actually into girls and not just gay for pay.
Just an observation, try not to take the forum too seriously.
Gratuitous and ill considered abuse of the girls to whom this forum is devoted. Fine -
we won't take your comments at all seriously
We doubt that Anna, TJ, the Gemmas and so on will take so equitably your description of them as 'washed up wannabees' though.
[Moderator Notice: Post edited to correct misquoting and remove uppercase posting]
(21-02-2010 08:34 )vostok 1 Wrote: [ -> ]I linked to a forum used by photographers in your industry.
The post that I linked to was made by someone who has hired and photographed Mel Rook. He claimed that he spoke to Mel on the phone recently, (in a professional basis, not as part of a "phone fantasy") who told him the situation that he mentioned in his post.
Now, if you wish to humiliate me to the forum and convincingly label me as an "anti-Blue-obsessive ®", then a good course of action would be to ...
You're doing fine on your own - ne help needed. Copy all the anti-Bluebird posts you made on this and other forums.
(21-02-2010 08:34 )vostok 1 Wrote: [ -> ]Now, if you wish to humiliate me to the forum and convincingly label me as an "anti-Blue-obsessive ®", then a good course of action would be to convey a message from Mel Rook stating that she finds my link to the models club forum as "Sad and Gay".
Bless you: You're reading the wrong post. Try reading what we actually replied to your post again.
(21-02-2010 08:34 )vostok 1 Wrote: [ -> ]But please bear in mind, I have on no occasion published any criticism of the elderly, hairy, out of shape "Stud".
Oh dear - you just couldn't help going all sad and gay could ya !
[Moderator Notice: Post edited to correct misquoting and remove uppercase posting]