[split] Paris attacks

Now I can see why these pair accused the little spat I had with Rammy as being trivial...!

Heaven forbid any of my little fall outs get this out of hand...

Carry on guys; I'm sure the wrath will soon fall...? lol.

nb. Can I nominate this for argument of the year while I'm here, pls..?

I Was not one of them who said your spat was trivial. I was the one you thanked for suggesting that rammy was guilty of being offended on someone else's behalf.

http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...pid1783399

I don't find being accused of being a racist or islamaphobe
Trivial. No more than you did when you defended your self of being accused of possible racism by rammy

(19-11-2015 22:20 )kelly1066 Wrote:  Now I can see why these pair accused the little spat I had with Rammy as being trivial...!

Heaven forbid any of my little fall outs get this out of hand...

Carry on guys; I'm sure the wrath will soon fall...? lol.

nb. Can I nominate this for argument of the year while I'm here, pls..?

Look and learn girl, look and learn

(19-11-2015 22:32 )setter1000 Wrote:  I Was not one of them who said your spat was trivial. I was the one you thanked for suggesting that rammy was guilty of being offended on someone else's behalf.

She's joking.

Isn't Roy chubby Brown anti PC?

(19-11-2015 15:00 )setter1000 Wrote:  @Wacawoo
Your reasoning is bizarre

If you want to play your pointless statistics game than here goes

Funny you should think that. Reject, eject, ignore everyhting thats not relavant - including what you yourself wrote.

This argument is still going on?

I wonder if it'll last as long as the fractious Sunni-Shia schism in Islam, which, is you believe Wikipedia, started around the year 632 and has led to all sorts of ramifications, including ISIL, the extremist Sunni salafi jihadist group likely responsible for the Paris attacks.

One could compare the two uncompromising ideological positions of Wackawoo and setter1000 to the two groups...but that could be seen as blatant satire.

Only another 1383 years to go...go to the extreme guys, you know you want to!

That's where you are wrong porker
It's not Wacawoo v Setter10000
Strictly speaking it's Wacawoo formerly yummyyazz, formerly SoopSoop,
Formerly loulo12, formerly mellover, formerly Tuesdayslump's, formerly lazy days v Setter1000
4 accounts banned one closed by request. Total accounts held on here 7 in all

Got to give the lad his due he is certainly creative.

I always thought you were not allowed to have multiple accounts, not did I realise that banned members were allowed to come back under another profile.
Obviously I was wrong.

considering you're not a moderator..? how do you know so much about his past accounts..? just curious....

(20-11-2015 03:04 )kelly1066 Wrote:  considering you're not a moderator..? how do you know so much about his past accounts..? just curious....

What if 'Setter' is 'Wackawoo' ? And he is having an argument with himself..... or they are physically one person and mentally two

*goes to get tinfoil hat*

(20-11-2015 03:04 )kelly1066 Wrote:  considering you're not a moderator..? how do you know so much about his past accounts..? just curious....

Is it only 7?.

To quote him:

Quote:I have been told that the moderators have given up banning you because you keep coming back.they just lose the will to keep checking up on you. I have been told that as long as you keep out of trouble they will let you stay. Nice going.

Quote:I have been informed since I questioned you on admitting that you were on here from the start that you have been banned more than once.

I like how he's even trying multiple accounts angle, nope just the one account at a time, as already pointed out, I have not and never have broken any rules.

It may come as a suprise, but I have been a moderator of several different sites.