Babestation Starlets - General Chat & Discussion

(06-09-2014 22:40 )Bandwagon Wrote:  That thread was full of everything and anything

Why was it full of everything and anything? Why wasn't it simply ignored like ChatGirl TVX?

(06-09-2014 13:04 )Barney Stinson Wrote:  

(06-09-2014 11:27 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  £175 just to watch one extra Babestation channel?

You need your head examined

You get 240+ FTA channels, quality hardware and the latest sky guide with free updates.

But you shouldn't complain that you can't watch on FreeView its like complaining that you cant watch because you don't have a TV.

I don't want 240+ FTA channels. I only watch about 7 or 8 hours regular tv a week, some nights it's not even on.

I'm not even that bothered about the 4th Bs channel. My point was - if they include the sky-only channel in the 'babe rotation' we won't know which of the scheduled babes will be on freeview and which won't.

And I only mentioned it would be a pain in the arse, not the end of the world as we know it.

(06-09-2014 22:48 )Count Spankula Wrote:  Why was it full of everything and anything? Why wasn't it simply ignored like ChatGirl TVX?

Exactly! You've answered it yourself, because fuck all of any interest was happening in those threads - people weren't providing entertaining reads.

(06-09-2014 22:59 )Bandwagon Wrote:  people weren't providing entertaining reads.

Why weren't they?

I wonder what the mission statement will be for BS2.

"Many people will think that this is the fourth BS channel. We understand why you would think this, but it is important to realise that it is actually the second one."

Very good! It continues:

"As some people will think it's the fourth most important BS channel and some will think it's the second, we plan to satisfy both expectations. We will only employ the following models on this channel:

Those who have been in the babe channel industry for 2-4 years.
Those who are new to the industry but not starlets.
Starlets who are not new to the industry.
We hope this is clear.

We will run this mission statement across the centre of the screen as a rolling graphic at all times, in order to avoid confusion."

(06-09-2014 20:26 )William H Bonney Wrote:  Maybe not much will change on the channel. Perhaps in view of some of the girls that have featured recently they just realised that 'starlets' was an inappropriate name. If all they have done is correct an ill-chosen name then we shouldn't read too much into the name change.

You are probably right, although I think some of the premier Babestation girls will be featuring a bit from now on. Anyway I'm more concerned by the dullness of the channel tonight than by anything else. This split screen technique doesn't work for me at all, I have to say.

(06-09-2014 21:31 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  

(06-09-2014 20:56 )benrichards7 Wrote:  lets face it, under the name "starlets" there was nothing new or innovating about the channel, so if they change it to something else, who cares? We're not losing anything!

Because bs for me were saying it was something new or innovating, a channel dedicated to babes that are new or inexperienced along with giving some of their bs babes "a chance to shine" that they weren't getting on the other bs channels. In the end it didn't deliver for me what bs said bs starlets would do. Possibly the callers weren't calling starlets because of the name starlets, thinking they would see new or up and coming babes but were seeing the likes of mica martinez, brookie little, maddie rose and Cali Garcia on it who have been on the babeshows for years, so bs have decided to change the name to bs2

Interesting to see if it will still just be the starlets babes on bs2 or whether other bs babes will be on it

your looking way to deep into it. its a wank channel, not bbc4!

Ahh BBC 4 as wank channel !
If only they could persuade Victoria Coren-Mitchell to wear slightly more revealing tops we'd be on the way there !

Whatever the channel is called now we have a split screen which limits the room for both babes to fit on screen and a thumping great OSG to limit it even more .
Honestly I despair sometimes .
The way they are going they will be crammed into the screen space size of a postage stamp .