Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion

^What you hinting - you going to launch a takeover bid for St66 HP?

(15-11-2021 16:22 )lovebabes56 Wrote:  ^What you hinting - you going to launch a takeover bid for St66 HP?

Must admit i did think about takeover over bid.

^Should we gat a consortium together on the forum like Del Boy and see if we can acquire it?

nah just thinking they will prob not renew the licence

Despite S66 recent troubles - not least - and selfishly - it's lack of TV presence, I would be very disappointed to see it end (especially as some who do not deserve it, and as always, get caught in the net) I cynically thought through recent times, that there were those that were going out of there way to bring it down, and see it fail! May there be a special place in hell for those that precipitated this demise, if that is what it turns out to be!!!! Some will say that it opens up an opportunity for the two that would remain, to bolster their ranks! Unfortunately, it seems, that there is only one that looks likely to bring most (if any) across!!

(15-11-2021 12:47 )winsaw Wrote:  I do wonder if reading there response 66 are trying to through the girls involved under the bus and get ofcom to send some of any fine directly to the girl it's happened in the past where ofcom has fined girls on the shows lots of money,

If the conditions of a broadcasting licence are breached Ofcom has the power to impose a sanction on the broadcaster. They can't sanction anyone else.

(09-11-2021 21:51 )Tumble_Drier Wrote:  

(09-11-2021 13:36 )BlastedKeith Wrote:  ^ All but one of the recorded incidents was before the watershed - one of them at 10:48 AM! I do understand why Ofcom have to be strict on this. It’s the easiest thing in the world to be flipping up and down the channels and find yourself in the sexchat zone. “No pussy or swearing FTA” does seem to fall into the “You had one job” category, and S66 blew it.

People can go on about Parental Responsibility as much as they like but if you cross the line pre-watershed you're going to get your arse kicked and deservedly so.

It looks like someone has been watching them very closely and with the amount of people "Working from home" they should have seen this coming.

I did write this last month https://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.p...pid2622375 :
[However, there is evidently a shared, continuing concern, about [posts on] this forum [inadvertently] being a source of information for those monitoring the channels.
Hence, posts that might potentially be even marginally compromising, don't stay for too long.
I find this rather baffling, not least because of more people on social media, but also that the greatest source of information, are the channels themselves.
For which I would expect [OFCOM has] self/appointed persons and or systems, doing such monitoring, continuously, as a far greater priority.]

All the quoted post is pertinent. Hence, I didn't merely extract the sentence in bold.

I wonder if this has been brought to attention of admin or if they are concerned that possibly some members might be OFCOM informants.

If OFCOM are monitoring this forum from a distance, would they have the power to shut this forum down?

And before you guys ask - no I'm not an OFCOM informant!!!

some guys like to boast on here, naming no names , about reporting channels to the regulators i've always thought that very dangerous. In the 66 ofcom notes 66 do say all the complaints came from one source. Is that a forum member ?

I seem to recall that there was at one point, that that it was the same person that reported St66 over and over again, and I can't remember if they were a mermber of thiis forum or if they were a member of St66.