Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 189 Vote(s) - 2.97 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion

Author Message
Censorship :-( Away
Sadly, no more caps. :-(
*****

Posts: 5,362
Joined: May 2009
Reputation: 52
Post: #15971
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion
^ Yet again, two of the best babes on S66 stuck on-screen together, and as a result, 'unwatchable' (IMO)! annoyed

Another 'give it a miss' night on S66; an all too common occurrence, these days! Sad
(This post was last modified: 24-10-2015 23:15 by Censorship :-(.)
24-10-2015 23:14
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Manuel Offline
I'd marry H. Lola in a heartbeat
****

Posts: 546
Joined: Oct 2015
Reputation: 14
Post: #15972
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion
(24-10-2015 22:41 )M-L-L Wrote:  
(24-10-2015 21:37 )gunnar Wrote:  You quite often find that the 2 strongest performers are crammed together on 1 set, while the weakest performer gets a set to herself. It doesn't make any logical sense, but then again that is S66 for you.

Not defending the practice at all, it makes for terrible viewing...

but it must be logical economically to have two performers on at the same time if this means you double the amount of calls to a single channel for a given period/peak time for calls ?
Particularly if they are performers people are keen/desperate enough to want to call anyway, regardless of whether they're sharing a screen ?

well, that's a big "if"...of course, if what you suggest is true, there is a logic. but it seems to me that the majority of people, at least on this forum, are particularly disappointed by those kind of shows, to the point that some of them could refuse to call their favourite performer when she's not "alone".

on another topic, yeah, lucy zara and j. jade are ALWAYS on their own...that's, of course, a contractual thing...maybe, when they left RLC, they were persueded to sign the contract with S66, and not with BS, because of this specific term. the "guarantee of solo-shows". imo, that's the only plausible reason

year after year after year, I keep reading that the shows were better "in the past"... maybe they were never that great (except in the pioneering era)?
(This post was last modified: 24-10-2015 23:18 by Manuel.)
24-10-2015 23:18
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Snooks Away
Snooker Loopy
*****

Posts: 51,756
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 280
Post: #15973
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion
If only...........
If only there could be a full blown 2-4-1.
A full blown, all action, pure sex 2-4-1 with Kandi and Clare.
Hours and hours of fondling, kissing, touching and squeezing.
Slowly disrobing one another to full nudity, drenching each other in oil before massaging each other all over.
Then once they are done they could head off to the shower and give each other a good soaping up and a good rub down.

If only............

HuhHuhHuh

*snookered waves his arms around in exasparation.

HuhHuhHuh

24-10-2015 23:38
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Censorship :-( Away
Sadly, no more caps. :-(
*****

Posts: 5,362
Joined: May 2009
Reputation: 52
Post: #15974
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion
To make matters worse, Kandi looks stunning tonight! eek (Clare's none too shabby as well! Rolleyes )

A criminal waste! annoyed
24-10-2015 23:44
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Snooks Away
Snooker Loopy
*****

Posts: 51,756
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 280
Post: #15975
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion
I know, I know.
It is so gut wrenching.
So depressing.
Soul destroying.

A total waste of 2 heavenly beauties.

Why oh why?
Why oh why oh why?

Huh.

24-10-2015 23:53
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Censorship :-( Away
Sadly, no more caps. :-(
*****

Posts: 5,362
Joined: May 2009
Reputation: 52
Post: #15976
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion
See, it's not difficult - two hot babes, two channels! Smile

[Image: image-2AD0_562C0FD4.jpg]

[Image: image-582B_562C0FD4.jpg]


Don't suppose it'll last, though! Sad
25-10-2015 00:13
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Censorship :-( Away
Sadly, no more caps. :-(
*****

Posts: 5,362
Joined: May 2009
Reputation: 52
Post: #15977
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion
^ Fuck! annoyed

Not long at all! SadSadSad
(This post was last modified: 25-10-2015 01:35 by Censorship :-(.)
25-10-2015 00:22
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Snooks Away
Snooker Loopy
*****

Posts: 51,756
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 280
Post: #15978
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion
Nah.
Was never gonna last Sad

25-10-2015 00:23
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Snooks Away
Snooker Loopy
*****

Posts: 51,756
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 280
Post: #15979
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion
Dammit dammit dammit.
I just can't stop dreaming of a 2-4-1.
Dammit annoyed.

25-10-2015 00:33
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Censorship :-( Away
Sadly, no more caps. :-(
*****

Posts: 5,362
Joined: May 2009
Reputation: 52
Post: #15980
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion
^ That's about the only way you're going to 'see one'! Rolleyes

Personally, more solo would be do just fine! Smile
Sadly, there's almost as little chance of that as an actual 2-4-1! bladewave Sad
(This post was last modified: 25-10-2015 00:42 by Censorship :-(.)
25-10-2015 00:40
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply