Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion

(09-02-2012 17:48 )Scottishbloke Wrote:  No wonder so many have fucked off this forum in the past year when all views and opinions can no longer be heard

Have you spoken to each person individually to know this or are you making assumptions again based on sensible replies to you?

(09-02-2012 14:26 )eagle_si Wrote:  The girls do come on here and read the comments. I know because Rachel (even though she’s officially not been on here since May last year) sent me a thank you on Twitter for a post I made in her thread. You know, the one where I responded to your malicious comments about her boob job. So it’s got nothing to do with not wanting to read disparaging comments, more a case of those comments not being worth replying to because they’re from people like you who don’t know them, never call but still feel it’s okay to groundlessly accuse them of stuff such as them fucking away like rabbits at work every time they get an opportunity.
If the girls get treated on here with respect, then they’ll come on here and interact and post. Lolly’s been doing that, and it’s a very welcome sign. I hope she’s still joining in six months from now.

When did I say they screw like rabbits every time they get an opportunity? My logo thread is just for fun because the logos only started to pop up in the last month or so, sometimes looking a bit suspicious and we never get an explanation for it. That makes it look a bit odd to me. They never used to do this, and it's obviously not just for tech reasons, as we can see from some of the sessions when it pops up after a woman makes a face or reacts to something. Why cut to it if there's nothing to hide? We've seen the crew and the women goof around all the time, and the logo never pops up, so why now if we can't actually see what the women are looking at? Something isn't adding up, and none of the explanations from others here seem to be the case either, as we've covered them all. Do I really care? Of course not, but it interests me to see what members like you think about it.

Obviously they don't screw like rabbits every time they get a chance like you assume I think they do, but I'm not naive, and I think sexual activity likely goes on there at times. It's not disrespectful to suggest that some things take place there, because there's nothing wrong with hooking up with someone you are attracted to. I don't mean out in the open infront of the others, but in private (That place is like a big apartment) Some of the crew members even work on the website, and have shot videos where the women are fooling around with them. No sex or anything explicit is shown, but ass slapping, grinding, BJ simulations, crawling nude ontop of them are frequent, so why couldn't that happen during a session break at the studio if two people were hot for each other??? You're telling me Afroman or any other crew member who has some play with a woman in the videos isn't going to do the same when a woman leaves a set if she's up for it? We've seen some of that before before in the past (Ass slapping, boob grabbing, Danica fun with the cameraman) so that seems pretty sexual to me, but not to you I guess . Where do they draw the line? Is this your thinking below?

Things that are OK for the crew to do at the studio:

Boob grabbing
Ass slapping
Putting food on ass
Having a woman sit on you and grind, or grind up against your crotch (yep, it's happened in some early sessions)
BJ Simulations (Looking at you Tiff. Her's seemed faked despite being out of frame, and she seems to tell the guy to put it away near the end, as if he really got it out then)

Not allowed at the studio:

Sex, not even in the bathroom when people are on their breaks. No exceptions!!!! Death to anyone who disobeys me!!!!!!!
BJ's. NEVER!!!!! Death to anyone who does this!!!!!!!!!

Be honest now Eagle, If you were a cameraman there, and were comfy with the women and someone wanted to take you to the bathroom during both of your breaks (When a woman is done with a session and goes on her break, the cameramen likely do as well), you're telling me you'd be completely surprised and would say no??? Please.

I apologise for my comment about Rachel, but it pains me to see women get implants when they have perfect bodies. I know it's their choice, but I sometimes can't understand their thinking, and I tend to react a bit rudely. Sorry.

(09-02-2012 18:12 )SYBORG666 Wrote:  I still like the channel but I have to agree with Scottishbloke and say that Elite seem to be having a very dire moment recently. Even though Elite had Fernanda on last night, it was so far away from previous shows that to me it looked like Fernanda's debut nightshow. Here's to hoping things change across all the channels and not just Elite because all the channels seem to be dire at the moment. We won't spend money if we're falling asleep watching dire shows.

Wouldn't say elite is very dire at the moment, yes it's not as good as it has been in the past but its still good and hopefully things can change that will allow it and the other babeshows to get back to how they used to be. Also wouldn't say the addition this week of paige turnah shows that elite is dire, think actually it gives them a massive boost and keeps elite amongst the top babeshows

Scottishbloke the response you get is simply down to the way you post, you don't really offer an opnion, you try and tell people that they're wrong and you're right. You pretty much also try and insult anyone that enjoys the shows in your posts anarl.


(I know there's no point posting this as we all know, you be trolling, hence why you post like that)

A lot of responsibilty for the decline rests also on the models currently at Elite aswell as the managment. Take a look at this list of previous models who in my opinion once made this channel great and must see TV at the time as it was the hottest show in town in it's heyday.

Anna Lovato
Ava Blue
Carmen Terrell
Danielle Maye
Hannah Prentice
Hazel Bond
Lori Buckby
Michelle Thorne
Sammie Pennington
Tommie Jo

And that's only a small selection of some of the past models. Now babestation has also lost models of similar quailty but have replaced them match for match with models just as good unlike Elite.

(09-02-2012 18:17 )mrmann Wrote:  When did I say they screw like rabbits every time they get an opportunity? My logo thread is just for fun because the logos only started to pop up in the last month or so, sometimes looking a bit suspicious and we never get an explanation for it. That makes it look a bit odd to me. They never used to do this, and it's obviously not just for tech reasons, as we can see from some of the sessions when it pops up after a woman makes a face or reacts to something. Why cut to it if there's nothing to hide? We've seen the crew and the women goof around all the time, and the logo never pops up, so why now if we can't actually see what the women are looking at?

Obviously they don't screw like rabbits every time they get a chance like you assume I think they do, but I'm not naive, and I think sexual activity likely goes on there at times. It's not disrespectful to suggest that some things take place there, because there's nothing wrong with hooking up with someone you are attracted to. I don't mean out in the open infront of the others, but in private (That place is like a big apartment) Be honest now Eagle, If you were a cameraman there, and Rachel or someone else wanted to take you to the bathroom during both of your breaks, you're telling me you'd say no? Please.

You really can't have much of a life if you spend so much of your time making up wild fantasies about the logo Especially after Sophia's little comment the other night.
If I was a cameraman and one of the girls took a fancy to me, I'd like to think that I have enough professionalism and self-control to resist while at work, though there would of course be nothing to stop me "hooking up" with them after hours if both parties wanted to do so.
So that place is like a big apartment is it? When did you get a guided tour of the studios?

(09-02-2012 18:44 )Scottishbloke Wrote:  A lot of responsibilty for the decline rests also on the models currently at Elite aswell as the managment. Take a look at this list of previous models who in my opinion once made this channel great and must see TV at the time as it was the hottest show in town in it's heyday.

Anna Lovato
Ava Blue
Carmen Terrell
Danielle Maye
Hannah Prentice
Hazel Bond
Lori Buckby
Michelle Thorne
Sammie Pennington
Tommie Jo

And that's only a small selection of some of the past models. Now babestation has also lost models of similar quailty but have replaced them match for match with models just as good unlike Elite.

Wrong to say elite have replaced the babes you've mentioned with poor ones. Elite have added several very good additions to the night roster capped off by this weeks addition of probably the current top uk pornstar Paige Turnah

Cellcast Channels/shows :
2 BS channels Sky
2 BS freeview channels
1 DirtyWives/ Masti Sky channel
1 Freeview Dirty Wives/Masti freeview channel
1 encrypted freeview channel featuring live girls
1 hard core live web show
1 German BS channel
Various websites

Elite Channels/shows :
4 Sky only channels
Website

If you compare the merits of the 2 company's then it's a non starter Cellcast wins hands down , they offer so much more than a few Sky only TV channels .
Elite has got some great girls , but at present that's about all it has got , Elite along with RLC is just about the tamest show going , it's started flooding the tv screen with ever growing OSG's and has recently lost it's freeview and freesat channels , that to me smells of channel going backwards
While i'm at it i may as well say the Cellcast channels are not not great either, yes they are pushing the boundaries with what they show compared to Elite and RLC , but then they spoil things by their adverts and OSG's and the lack of air time given to some girls compared to others .

(09-02-2012 19:06 )mr mystery Wrote:  Cellcast Channels/shows :
2 BS channels Sky
2 BS freeview channels
1 DirtyWives/ Masti Sky channel
1 Freeview Dirty Wives/Masti freeview channel
1 encrypted freeview channel featuring live girls
1 hard core live web show
1 German BS channel
Various websites

Elite Channels/shows :
4 Sky only channels
Website

If you compare the merits of the 2 company's then it's a non starter Cellcast wins hands down , they offer so much more than a few Sky only TV channels .

The only problem with putting it that way is, the 'other channel' is up there with bs.

Ah, the bigger company who's annual accounts make for some grim reading. Cellcast have it all, well, except for a nice profit at the end of the fiscal year.