Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

(22-09-2011 08:13 )HannahsPet Wrote:  last week just been watching the tease hour then switching off or over to other channels

That sums up BS at the moment. They are putting on the most dreadfully, repetitive shows, and for my money, are the single worst channel around now. We all know which performers BS value and rate (Lolly, Camilla, Amanda, the twins); Everyone else is merely window dressing. They've even overtaken Elite in the repetitive stakes- almost impossible I had previously thought.

There was a point last night were both Ella and Lilly were on different channels and both were doing the "calling all slaves" domination stuff at the same time , on the other channel the girl (can't remember who it was) was talking according to the OSG's a girl caller , so for a time last night there was no way if you wanted a normal sexy chat with a BS girl that you could get to do so on any BS channel , you either had to be belittled and dominated by Ella and Lilly or want to listen in to a girl caller , i wonder just how many regular callers of the BS girls now call other channels instead because of this scenario ? .

(21-09-2011 17:10 )Broncobilly Wrote:  Funny how most of the babes who left bs over the years are on other shows yet doing better shows than the girls on bs. Part of the problem with bs is there idea of getting in porn stars it suggests the show would be more sexual than the babes who used to do it who based the show on the viewer using there imagination as well as an interssting presenting style.

Bs has failed to move on and up scale the show they have the same no effort sets they always had and have basically no interaction between the babes. It is interesting that the longer bs has been around the less sexual it has become. They are not monitored by ofcom so they are free to be more interesting yet have failed IMO.

Charlie o'neal on elite is a good example of this. When she was on bs she was invisible and her shows were ok, but since she has been on elite she is vastly better

(22-09-2011 12:07 )The Robot Devil Wrote:  

(22-09-2011 08:13 )HannahsPet Wrote:  last week just been watching the tease hour then switching off or over to other channels

That sums up BS at the moment. They are putting on the most dreadfully, repetitive shows, and for my money, are the single worst channel around now. We all know which performers BS value and rate (Lolly, Camilla, Amanda, the twins); Everyone else is merely window dressing. They've even overtaken Elite in the repetitive stakes- almost impossible I had previously thought.

Describes them perfectly therobotdevil. bs's shows these days are dreadfully repetitive as you say, an example was at the start of this week on monday and Tuesday when it was pretty much the same babes on each night and yes the have taken over elite in terms of this I agree. This and the constant plugging and interruptions does as you say make bs the worst channel

(22-09-2011 14:49 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  

(22-09-2011 12:07 )The Robot Devil Wrote:  

(22-09-2011 08:13 )HannahsPet Wrote:  last week just been watching the tease hour then switching off or over to other channels

That sums up BS at the moment. They are putting on the most dreadfully, repetitive shows, and for my money, are the single worst channel around now. We all know which performers BS value and rate (Lolly, Camilla, Amanda, the twins); Everyone else is merely window dressing. They've even overtaken Elite in the repetitive stakes- almost impossible I had previously thought.

Describes them perfectly therobotdevil. bs's shows these days are dreadfully repetitive as you say, an example was at the start of this week on monday and Tuesday when it was pretty much the same babes on each night and yes the have taken over elite in terms of this I agree. This and the constant plugging and interruptions does as you say make bs the worst channel

And why are the shows so repetitiive, dull, and boring? Because all BS give a shit about is making money...so of course all of their energies are devoted towards Xtame, and to hell with us. Judging by what I have been reading on here, their obsession with plugging Xtame has had/is having a seriously detrimental effect on the main channels of theirs.

All I'll say to conclude is thank god I dont waste my time and money on that shite of a channel. To those that put themselves through the nightly torment of watching in the futile hope that things will change, I'll say this...there are plenty of alternatives to BS, and far superior ones at that. Don't inflict this joke of a station on yourself...things will NOT change. BS don't care what you or I think...they only care about making as much ££££ as they can. Give that station the flick.

If I ran BS and read just half the comments on here I would know something was wrong and needed fixing. I would look at the complaints to see what areas were letting the company down. I would then take steps to address all valid complaints. Of course this is because I would want a successful,long term business that respected it's loyal customers in the belief that loyalty would keep a healthy profit.
Obviously BS seem to have the business acumen of the Captain of the Titanic who,upon hearing of icebergs ordered full speed ahead.

What pisses me off the most about the constant plugging of BSX, is that I have Sky! I have no way of even getting it (even though I never would want it)! I know there's the website, but fuck that shit

Like what's previously been posted Cellcast only care about £££'s , so as long as revenues continue in a upwards fashion they won't change anything , apparently revenue for the first part of this year was acctually up , so they ain't going to change anything that's resulted in increased revenue thats for sure .

Doesn't look like there'll be a tease show tonight, Amber James & Hannah Claydon on the afternoon show, although Amber did dabble presenting on a couple of BS Nightshows, don't think either are up for the nightshow phonework.

(22-09-2011 14:32 )10ofclubs Wrote:  I fully understand why babestation do what they do i.e with OSG and constant interruptions picture video scams etc etc it's a tactical approach because they notice they continue to be funded and make alot of money out of the people who dislike they station this thread is evidence of that!!!

How in hell do you figure that??? This thread is full of posts by viewers saying how they've STOPPED paying for BS's services!

Ffs, people are saying they no longer even watch, let alone buy any of the services.

(22-09-2011 18:38 )mr mystery Wrote:  Like what's previously been posted Cellcast only care about £££'s , so as long as revenues continue in a upwards fashion they won't change anything , apparently revenue for the first part of this year was acctually up , so they ain't going to change anything that's resulted in increased revenue thats for sure .

Always assuming that the increased revenue is in fact the result of the advertising, but they have no way of knowing that. Just because one followed the other doesn't prove it resulted from it.

Example:

On a warm sunny afternoon a while back I went to my corner shop to buy some milk, but when I got there I found they didn't have any. During the night it started to rain and it was still raining the next morning when I went back to the shop to try again. This time I found they had plenty of milk available.

So there was milk on the second day because it was raining? I think not.

As I've said many times before, there's a far more obvious reason for their increased revenue.