Studio 66 on Freeview

I never thought I'd say this, but (the lack of DOG infested screen, incessant advertising etc. notwithstanding) I think its even worse than TS!

(08-05-2011 11:40 )TheWatcher Wrote:  Its still better than Babestation with all its OSGs, adverts, interuptions and oversized tits.

Don't really agree with the oversized tits remark , BS gives plenty of air time to the not so oversized tit girls , not sure if you mean fake boobs or just girls with naturally large boobs , from off the top of my head BS have these natural girls working for them .
Amanda
Ella
Georgie
Geri (still does the occasional phone session)
Kandi
Jada
Honey Scott
Michelle Moist
Paige
Stevie
Tammy

Elite have a few oversize tit girls as well , although some are yet to appear on freeview , here they are .

Alice Goodwin
Danica
Kelly Bell (soon to be starting)
Fernanda
Sophia Lares
Ashley Emma

Elite also have some fake big boobed girls that only appear on days so will probably never be seen on freeview nights .
Elite do have a fair few natural girs working for them but without counting them all up BS probably have just has many but of course they have more girls to choose from .

In regards to what "Censorship:-( asked about if Elite is tamed down for freeview i would say no , it's about the same as what is shown on the Sky only channels .
I agree that Elite is visually better than BS but only because of the irritating adverts and OSG's used on BS , some of the BS girls solo sections when you can see them that is are IMO better than what is shown on Elite .

(08-05-2011 12:49 )mr mystery Wrote:  Elite have a few oversize tit girls as well , although some are yet to appear on freeview , here they are .

Alice Goodwin
Danica
Kelly Bell (soon to be starting)
Fernanda
Sophia Lares
Ashley Emma

I have no objection to big boobs provided they're natural but I have a real aversion to fakes.

You list just half a dozen fakes, compared with Boxstation, where these come to mind with very little thought:

Dani O'Neal
Tiffany Chambers
Ava Blue
Lolly Badcock
Louise Porter
Leah Jaye
Camilla Quance
Kerry Louise
Lilly Roma
Daryl Morgan
Lynsey Atkinson
Charlie C
Annie Bullah
Delta White
Ree Petra
Rio Lee
Megan Moore (she still does occasional phone stints)

Besides, perhaps the real point that Watcher was trying to make is the ratio of real to fake on BS any given night and the relative amounts of screen time they get. The fakes almost always outnumber the naturals. This is particularly crucial on Freeview as the really classy natural girls like Paige, Kandi, Tammy (especially Tammy!) and Stevie are often kept on Glamourcurse nearly all night, where Freeviewers can't see them. (Perversely, they're often only released from there at 3am, when Freeviewers would have been able to see them anyway if they'd stayed put.)

Elite seems to be making an effort to ensure a fair share out of FV screen time (although I did notice one exception the other night).

Edit: Also, for some obscure reason, BS 2-4-1s (or what laughably passes for such at the moment) almost always feature one natural and one fake, often one of the more grotesque ones. This might seem like fair shares but thoroughly ruins the spectacle for any lover of natural girls.

(08-05-2011 11:31 )Censorship :-( Wrote:  Has there always been such an apparent 'lack of available footwear' (in other words, is it a channel for foot fetishists ! )?

I'm nobody's foot fetishist, but I've always thought it bizarre that glamour models and porn girls take off everything except their shoes. Wtf?

It's like the reciprocal to the old joke about blokes keeping their socks on.

(08-05-2011 11:31 )Censorship :-( Wrote:  Does it always feature so much (mind-numbingly boring, IMO) 'technical nudity'?

Yes.

(08-05-2011 11:31 )Censorship :-( Wrote:  Has there always been such an apparent 'lack of available footwear' (in other words, is it a channel for foot fetishists ! )?

The girls are barefoot quite a lot, but I wouldn't say it's a channel for foot fetishists as Adele and Sophia are the only two girls that I've seen do any sort of foot play. And most of the girls need to give their feet a good wash before any such thoughts can be entertained

(08-05-2011 11:31 )Censorship :-( Wrote:  Is it always this poor, or has it been (seriously?) tamed down for FV?

It depends on whose on etc, but in general the Sky channels haven't been as good lately. Another problem with the Freeview channel is that it starts quite late, and the Elite channels always seem to go a bit quiet after 3am.

(09-05-2011 02:08 )vila Wrote:  

(08-05-2011 12:49 )mr mystery Wrote:  Elite have a few oversize tit girls as well , although some are yet to appear on freeview , here they are .

Alice Goodwin
Danica
Kelly Bell (soon to be starting)
Fernanda
Sophia Lares
Ashley Emma

I have no objection to big boobs provided they're natural but I have a real aversion to fakes.

You list just half a dozen fakes, compared with Boxstation, where these come to mind with very little thought:

Dani O'Neal
Tiffany Chambers
Ava Blue
Lolly Badcock
Louise Porter
Leah Jaye
Camilla Quance
Kerry Louise
Lilly Roma
Daryl Morgan
Lynsey Atkinson
Charlie C
Annie Bullah
Delta White
Ree Petra
Rio Lee
Megan Moore (she still does occasional phone stints)

Besides, perhaps the real point that Watcher was trying to make is the ratio of real to fake on BS any given night and the relative amounts of screen time they get. The fakes almost always outnumber the naturals. This is particularly crucial on Freeview as the really classy natural girls like Paige, Kandi, Tammy (especially Tammy!) and Stevie are often kept on Glamourcurse nearly all night, where Freeviewers can't see them. (Perversely, they're often only released from there at 3am, when Freeviewers would have been able to see them anyway if they'd stayed put.)

I know this is a Freeview thread and what appears on freeview but my comments are from a Sky viewers point of view so my perseption of the channels is probably different from freeview only viewers , i get to see a lot more of the natural girls you mention and others as well when on Sky only , i don't think that during Sky only hours that the natural girls get any less screen time than girls that have fake boobs ie BS don't give the preference to the fake boobs girls in terms of how long they are on screen , although like you say they have loads of fake boob girls on BS so you get to see more of the fake girls than natural , but on Sky there is always plenty of air time given to the natural girls but they do have a greater ratio of fake boob girls working for BS than Elite at the moment , but Elite also goes through stages when they have loads of fake boob girls working for them as well , i don't think Jamie runs a policy were he just goes looking for natural girls or BS look to employ fake boob girls , they just employ girls that are available and who they think will bring in the calls whether they are fake or natural , Elite have had loads of fake boob girls working for them in the past such as Michelle thorn , Emily Dean , Delta White , Tiffany Chambers , Dionne Mendez , Carmen Terrel , Anastasia Stevens , Ava Blue , Gemma Massey , Tommy Jo etc and probably others , but it just so happens that at present they have a bigger ratio of natural girls compared to BS of natural compared to fake boob girls working for them i think , this could change at any time due to who Jamie hires or fires . Personally it doesn't bother me one bit if the girls are natural or fake , it's all about how good the girls is on the phone and what type of performance she put on that attracts me to the girls .

due to the bad weather at the weekend i had to watch freeview as sky was not working, and all i can say is OMG that was bad, i can't see how having Charlie on for more than 1 hour at the start of the show is a good thing, if this is how freeview is every night it is such a wasted opportunity,
i can't see why elite can not change the feed to freeview every 30 mins to a different one of it's sky channel which would give a nice bit of variety,
also after a quick read of the thread i see that some of elites girls have not been on yet, this is very strange as i would have thought they would have wanted to see who the freeview audience take to the most

Some fair points winsaw, though there has been some very good stuff on Elite's freeview in the last week, (I'm thinking of a specific Mica session, a specific Lori session, two Rachel sessions and a brief chunk of Sophia.)

The thing about the Freeview coverage of Charlie which has been odd is not that it has broadcast her so much (she is a truly beautiful girl after all), but that she has been broadcast in exactly the same outfit (solo black holdups) for about 4-5 nights in a row, largely in the exact same position on the exact same white couch!

The biggest puzzle though was why the Freeview coverage completely ignored the Alexis / Sophia night (a one off event) in favour of cutting between two other regular nightgirls neither of whom was doing anything particularly eyecatching.

(09-05-2011 12:44 )Rise Wrote:  The biggest puzzle though was why the Freeview coverage completely ignored the Alexis / Sophia night (a one off event) in favour of cutting between two other regular nightgirls neither of whom was doing anything particularly eyecatching.

well you did not miss that much lol, all i can think is they are trying to build a fan base for the regulars, but in doing so are missing the point that it is the special event's that will get new people watching elite
when/if Danica gets on TV again i would put her on freeview as that is going to bring in new people to elite

Just thought i would mention something that i have noticed about there being a difference to what is shown on the Sky 920 "filth" channel and the Freeview 192 "filth" channel , i was comparing picture quality of the two channels last week (of witch my freeview is slightly better) when i noticed that although the same girl and set were on both channels the Sky channel had the extra square box OSG in the top right hand corner of the screen and it was partially obscuring Dionne Daniels , so i instantly switched to freeview were to my surprise there was no square box OSG's and all of Dionne could be seen , i have since checked this out a few times and freeview is largely apart from the odd occasion free from the annoying square box OSG's that Sky viewers have to contend with .
Also on one occasion i checked out the differences between Sky and freeview i noticed that a different camera angle was also being shown on freeview to what was shown on sky , i have only seen this once but don't check out the difference's every night and all night long so don't know how often this happens .
So i thought i would just point out Elite's Sky viewers have to put up with their favorite girls being partially obscured at times by square box OSG'S much more than freeviewers do although nowhere near as much as on BS , so the freeview only people may be unaware that Elite also use the extra square box OSG quite a lot when they mention things about being able to see the Elite girls without them being covered in square box's .