Ofcom Discussion

Unfortunatley I think there is more chance in me becoming the next king of England than Ofcom being abolished. I just wish the babechannels would get a backbone and challenge Ofcom.

(04-12-2010 22:36 )SYBORG666 Wrote:  Unfortunatley I think there is more chance in me becoming the next king of England than Ofcom being abolished. I just wish the babechannels would get a backbone and challenge Ofcom.

Um, Bang Babes did just that, and now their best channel has been removed.

I'm all for the other channels challenging Ofcom, but I worry that Ofcom will just go after all of them as well.

(04-12-2010 22:36 )SYBORG666 Wrote:  Unfortunatley I think there is more chance in me becoming the next king of England than Ofcom being abolished. I just wish the babechannels would get a backbone and challenge Ofcom.

It suits some of the channels to be limited to tame content. Their owners sell R18 by other means and want to protect their sales. Cross-media conflict of interest rules should ban sex shop owners and magazine publishers from operating adult channels.

i was just wondering what ofcoms view of pre watershed nudity was as during an episode of miranda on bbc2 last night we saw a woman strip naked with her back to the camera surely this could based on their clamp down on bang media recently be in breach of regulations or is it one law for the bbc and another for an independent channel
p.s sorry if ive put this into the wrong thread

(08-12-2010 00:13 )jimmyt73 Wrote:  i was just wondering what ofcoms view of pre watershed nudity was as during an episode of miranda on bbc2 last night we saw a woman strip naked with her back to the camera...

The attitude to daytime nudity is probably a lot more liberal than you imagine... just so long as it doesn't happen bewtween channels 901 and 967, apparantley

(08-12-2010 02:00 )StanTheMan Wrote:  

(08-12-2010 00:13 )jimmyt73 Wrote:  i was just wondering what ofcoms view of pre watershed nudity was as during an episode of miranda on bbc2 last night we saw a woman strip naked with her back to the camera...

The attitude to daytime nudity is probably a lot more liberal than you imagine... just so long as it doesn't happen bewtween channels 901 and 967, apparantley

From the back is probably OK. The BBFC is quite OK with nudity at cert 12 provided it is non sexual. Please tell me it was not Miranda.

I seem to remember that one of the original 1970s Pink Panther films had a topless back scene, where a woman undresses to go into a sauna. And thats a kids film from an era when pubes were not even permitted in adult porn.

Please tell me it was not Miranda. I wont sleep n

^ No it wasnt..you can sleep soundly

(08-12-2010 00:13 )jimmyt73 Wrote:  i was just wondering what ofcoms view of pre watershed nudity was as during an episode of miranda on bbc2 last night we saw a woman strip naked with her back to the camera surely this could based on their clamp down on bang media recently be in breach of regulations or is it one law for the bbc and another for an independent channel
p.s sorry if ive put this into the wrong thread

Or Sexcetera that LivinGit seem to be showing most nights from 11-12 and 12-1am on Sky 114, BELOW 2 BBC channels. Actual glimpses of pussy and cock (rhymes with "rock" in case the censor has been at it) and clear descriptions of fetish sex (a No-No according to Ofcom) such as women dressed head to toe in rubber, gas masks included, and a partial female-to-male transexual getting it from behind from his/her strap on wearing girlfriend.

Its a mainstream channel in the main area that appeals to varied audiences, not a clearly marked sex channel that can be locked out en block, and the only context is that the show is about sex.

(08-12-2010 03:20 )eccles Wrote:  

(08-12-2010 00:13 )jimmyt73 Wrote:  i was just wondering what ofcoms view of pre watershed nudity was as during an episode of miranda on bbc2 last night we saw a woman strip naked with her back to the camera surely this could based on their clamp down on bang media recently be in breach of regulations or is it one law for the bbc and another for an independent channel
p.s sorry if ive put this into the wrong thread

Or Sexcetera that LivinGit seem to be showing most nights from 11-12 and 12-1am on Sky 114, BELOW 2 BBC channels. Actual glimpses of pussy and cock (rhymes with "rock" in case the censor has been at it) and clear descriptions of fetish sex (a No-No according to Ofcom) such as women dressed head to toe in rubber, gas masks included, and a partial female-to-male transexual getting it from behind from his/her strap on wearing girlfriend.

Its a mainstream channel in the main area that appeals to varied audiences, not a clearly marked sex channel that can be locked out en block, and the only context is that the show is about sex.

Last night (Tuesday), Film4 showed "In The Cut", starring Meg Ryan and Mark Ruffalo. The film started at 11:45 and within 20 mins we saw a graphic scene where a woman was giving a blow job to a guy in the toilet. More sex, nudity and strong language was included throughout the film.
If anything even close to this was shown on one of the babe channels OFCOM would be down on them like the proverbial ton of bricks.
What irks me most is the amazing double standards shown by OFCOM. Maybe they believe that Film4 viewers are sophisticated movie buffs and are responsible persons while Babe Cahnnel fans aren't and need protecting from themselves.
Good enough for Film4 - Good enough for Bang Babes.

She was 'mimicking' a blow job and other sex acts, that happens on the babeshows all the time.


This thread is starting to make me laugh, most of you all claim to hate ofcom but you now want them to investigate and take action against every other channel, Where's your logic in that?