Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion

3-4-1 now Caty,Mica an Gemma.

Well I can say that was an awesome session.

Caty starts off on her own, and then Mica runs in like she can't get at Caty quick enough, and then to top it all, 15 minutes later Gemma turns up and says "I'm feeling horny watching these two" and joins in as well.

Absolutely brilliant.

hope someone capped the 3 4 1 as id gone to bed by then

elite blew the other babechannels right out of the water. started with a sensational show from danica, her best nightshow yet and then at midnight 2 simultaneous 2 4 1's started with sopha and gemma and caty and mica. probably the moment of the night even outdoing danica was when caty and mica said "cock" live on air. they are great entertainment together

Don't worry Rammy, I got all three sections of the 3-4-1, Caty on her own, Caty & Mica's 2-4-1 that followed, and the 3-4-1 with Gemma.

And as for them saying cock, there's nothing wrong with that, they could have been referring to a male chicken.

Well this is turning into a nice 2-4-1 by Ashley and Caty.

Talk about dancing cheek to cheek, now I don't think I'd get away with that on the dance floor, but it brings a whole new meaning to "Strictly CUM Dancing"

Well I see the webstream quality has been turned back down to normal, So I guess complaining is back on the schedule.

Not that I can blame them for turning it down again, as bandwidth costs are not cheap. But with a 24 hour streaming TV station I though they would have negotiated a fixed term contract, rather than paying for bandwidth used.

But what the hell, I've never run a channel, so what do I know.

Still it was nice while it lasted.

sure was a nice 2 4 1 with ashley and caty also a decent 2 4 1 with daniella and sophia. as for ashley and caty id give them a TEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!

(04-04-2010 00:35 )aceman65 Wrote:  Well I see the webstream quality has been turned back down to normal, So I guess complaining is back on the schedule.

Not that I can blame them for turning it down again, as bandwidth costs are not cheap. But with a 24 hour streaming TV station I though they would have negotiated a fixed term contract, rather than paying for bandwidth used.

But what the hell, I've never run a channel, so what do I know.

Still it was nice while it lasted.

i thought that would of been a fundemental part of saving costs would be a fixed term contract.

Well Chris, I just assumed that because they turned the quality back down, that they must be paying for bandwidth used.

Because if they do have a fixed term contract then there would be no point in turning it down again, because they would still pay the same amount regardless of the bandwidth used.

But like I said, I don't run a TV station. I can only comment on what I see.

(04-04-2010 12:53 )aceman65 Wrote:  Well Chris, I just assumed that because they turned the quality back down, that they must be paying for bandwidth used.

Because if they do have a fixed term contract then there would be no point in turning it down again, because they would still pay the same amount regardless of the bandwidth used.

But like I said, I don't run a TV station. I can only comment on what I see.

i know am agreeing with you aceman, i would of thought they would of got a fixed term deal, as its a lot cheaper then going by bandwidth used.