Newcomer Of The Year Discussion Thread

Simple question to those that have voted do they want this contest stopping and restarting with a 13 month format,
I am only interested in those that have voted as it's who it would effect,
If most of you want to change I will start over later this week please let me know your thoughts

^^ Whatever you do, please keep my selections that I posted on page one Can't be fucked posting them again

(07-11-2022 11:33 )winsaw Wrote:  

(07-11-2022 00:51 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  

(06-11-2022 23:27 )winsaw Wrote:  Just wondering if you actually plan on posting a list of names in this thread,
As you seem to be very invested in this vote with out actually voting lol,

I haven't said it's an on going issues it's one that seamed to be sorted 4 years ago by the move of the date to November, and it clearly worked for 3 years

This is the part that you haven't fully grasped. The move you made 4 years ago sorted nothing. I can guarantee that in the following 3 years babes will have missed out. It wouldn't take me long to give examples. The fact that nothing was flagged-up has made it look like a solution. Pure luck.
For the LAST time I will explain, in a 365 day comp it's irrelevant what month you start, if you start in June & finish in June, then any babe who debuts on July 31st or before will never have a chance to compete as a Newcomer.

A 13 month comp would be progress, no doubt. Personally, I'd want longer, if you're going to make a change, then make the best chance possible, otherwise, further tweeks may be necessary.
If everyone agrees that one extra month is long enough to get noticed by the majority, then fine. What are we looking at, 2 or 3 shows a week on average so that's 8 - 12 shows, is that long enough. Consider that they will most likely be all webshows, as it's highly unlikely that a new babe would be thrown onto tv, it usually takes months, at BS, maybe XP is different.

Sorry to crash an award thread, but if you make the award over 13 months and longer, it would then become possible for a girl to win the newcomer award twice, which isn't what your aiming for.

Winsaw could concider making the eligablity from the start of October to the start of October the following year, and anyone starting on the shows (when they become better known) after that time is eligable the following year.

(07-11-2022 11:33 )winsaw Wrote:  That a pretty big thing to say it's not a fair competition ,

Well in 2019 Maria Smith was a truly outstanding newcomer, proven by the fact that she featured in the UK Babe Channels Babe Of The Year vote and was also the winner of the Empress of Xpanded award that year. However in the newcomer of the year vote she was mysteriously nowhere to be seen, so how is it a fair competition?

(07-11-2022 11:33 )winsaw Wrote:  That a pretty big thing to say it's not a fair competition ,
I haven't said it's an on going issues it's one that seamed to be sorted 4 years ago by the move of the date to November, and it clearly worked for 3 years,
I said I like the idea of the 13 months didn't you read my earlier post, I am always trying to make these better why would you think I wouldn't change it,
To me if you don't vote them you really haven't got anything to say about the vote

Rubbish. It just seemed that way because a potential winner like Zoe didn't get caught up in it.

Moving the dates about changes nothing. Babes can, and do, start on the shows at any month of the year. And you don't need to have a 13 month qualifying period either.
You can stick with 12 months if you use a qualifying period each year of 1st Oct to 30th Sept for the vote held in Nov.
This will achieve the same thing as a 13 month period but still means no babe ever gets two cracks at the title.

(07-11-2022 11:33 )winsaw Wrote:  To me if you don't vote them you really haven't got anything to say about the vote

Sorry, I thought this was an open forum. I thought we were past the stage of trying to censor people.

(07-11-2022 12:28 )Charlemagne Wrote:  Winsaw could concider making the eligablity from the start of October to the start of October the following year, and anyone starting on the shows (when they become better known) after that time is eligable the following year.

Yes, I already said that about 2 pages ago, but it seems to have been conveniently overlooked

(07-11-2022 12:28 )Charlemagne Wrote:  Sorry to crash an award thread, but if you make the award over 13 months and longer, it would then become possible for a girl to win the newcomer award twice, which isn't what your aiming for.

How? Surely at the start of a competition you would say who won last time and then perhaps add a disclaimer like DON'T VOTE FOR THIS PERSON EVEN IF THEY ARE ELIGIBLE AGAIN ARE YOU SOME SORT OF MORON OR WHAT and if they still do, just don't add in the votes for that girl.

I mean, some problems are pretty soluble

(07-11-2022 12:35 )barracuda Wrote:  

(07-11-2022 11:33 )winsaw Wrote:  That a pretty big thing to say it's not a fair competition ,

Well in 2019 Maria Smith was a truly outstanding newcomer, proven by the fact that she featured in the UK Babe Channels Babe Of The Year vote and was also the winner of the Empress of Xpanded award that year. However in the newcomer of the year vote she was mysteriously nowhere to be seen, so how is it a fair competition?

You never voted for her that year so it can't have bothered you that much,
She debut in Jan 19 so had over 10 months to impress people and get a vote in this an advantage over many girls who debut later, people simply choose like yourself not to vote for her,